Alison McEwen, Kelly E. Ormond, Yasmin Cathcart-King, HUGO Genetic Counselling Education Sub-Committee, Milena Paneque
{"title":"就遗传咨询师教育的核心知识和技能形成全球共识。","authors":"Alison McEwen, Kelly E. Ormond, Yasmin Cathcart-King, HUGO Genetic Counselling Education Sub-Committee, Milena Paneque","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There are over 130 genetic counselor (GC) training programs documented in more than 30 countries. Some regions also have developed practice-based competencies and guidelines for accrediting GC training, often including lists of required curriculum items (for example: ACGC, CAGC, EBMG, HGSA). However, areas where genetic counseling is emerging or desired may struggle to create training approaches from these often-aspirational knowledge and skill development lists. In a collaborative effort between the Human Genome Organization (HUGO) Education Workgroup and the Transnational Alliance for Genetic Counseling (TAGC), we conducted a global consensus process to assess and deliberate over which knowledge and skills were broadly considered ‘core’ to the GC educational process. We utilized an online-modified Delphi process to survey a purposive global sample of GC education providers and members of credentialing boards from countries with established GC and medical genetics providers in areas where GC education is newly emerging. We identified a list of 64 potential topics through a literature review and review of relevant curriculum guidelines and professional competencies. We then assessed relevance in a 2-round survey process using the criteria of >80% agreement. Topics that met these criteria, including those that were borderline, were discussed in two online consensus meetings. We present the consensus list of 25 content topics across four major areas of knowledge and skills: counseling and communication, genetics and genomics, medical knowledge, and genetic counseling healthcare professional skills and knowledge that we propose should be included in the GC curriculum for countries where GCs are new or emerging. We also propose 11 additional “Tier 2” topics that could be considered depending on regional needs or as countries evolve the profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing global consensus about core knowledge and skills for genetic counselor education\",\"authors\":\"Alison McEwen, Kelly E. Ormond, Yasmin Cathcart-King, HUGO Genetic Counselling Education Sub-Committee, Milena Paneque\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgc4.70116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There are over 130 genetic counselor (GC) training programs documented in more than 30 countries. Some regions also have developed practice-based competencies and guidelines for accrediting GC training, often including lists of required curriculum items (for example: ACGC, CAGC, EBMG, HGSA). However, areas where genetic counseling is emerging or desired may struggle to create training approaches from these often-aspirational knowledge and skill development lists. In a collaborative effort between the Human Genome Organization (HUGO) Education Workgroup and the Transnational Alliance for Genetic Counseling (TAGC), we conducted a global consensus process to assess and deliberate over which knowledge and skills were broadly considered ‘core’ to the GC educational process. We utilized an online-modified Delphi process to survey a purposive global sample of GC education providers and members of credentialing boards from countries with established GC and medical genetics providers in areas where GC education is newly emerging. We identified a list of 64 potential topics through a literature review and review of relevant curriculum guidelines and professional competencies. We then assessed relevance in a 2-round survey process using the criteria of >80% agreement. Topics that met these criteria, including those that were borderline, were discussed in two online consensus meetings. We present the consensus list of 25 content topics across four major areas of knowledge and skills: counseling and communication, genetics and genomics, medical knowledge, and genetic counseling healthcare professional skills and knowledge that we propose should be included in the GC curriculum for countries where GCs are new or emerging. We also propose 11 additional “Tier 2” topics that could be considered depending on regional needs or as countries evolve the profession.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445634/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70116\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Developing global consensus about core knowledge and skills for genetic counselor education
There are over 130 genetic counselor (GC) training programs documented in more than 30 countries. Some regions also have developed practice-based competencies and guidelines for accrediting GC training, often including lists of required curriculum items (for example: ACGC, CAGC, EBMG, HGSA). However, areas where genetic counseling is emerging or desired may struggle to create training approaches from these often-aspirational knowledge and skill development lists. In a collaborative effort between the Human Genome Organization (HUGO) Education Workgroup and the Transnational Alliance for Genetic Counseling (TAGC), we conducted a global consensus process to assess and deliberate over which knowledge and skills were broadly considered ‘core’ to the GC educational process. We utilized an online-modified Delphi process to survey a purposive global sample of GC education providers and members of credentialing boards from countries with established GC and medical genetics providers in areas where GC education is newly emerging. We identified a list of 64 potential topics through a literature review and review of relevant curriculum guidelines and professional competencies. We then assessed relevance in a 2-round survey process using the criteria of >80% agreement. Topics that met these criteria, including those that were borderline, were discussed in two online consensus meetings. We present the consensus list of 25 content topics across four major areas of knowledge and skills: counseling and communication, genetics and genomics, medical knowledge, and genetic counseling healthcare professional skills and knowledge that we propose should be included in the GC curriculum for countries where GCs are new or emerging. We also propose 11 additional “Tier 2” topics that could be considered depending on regional needs or as countries evolve the profession.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.