医疗保险参保人员兴奋剂过量预测模型。

IF 11.3 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tuhina Srivastava, Rebecca Arden Harris, Cheryl Bettigole, Hanxi Zhang, Colleen M Brensinger, Kacie Bogar, Fengge Wang, Elizabeth D Nesoff, Warren B Bilker, Sean Hennessy
{"title":"医疗保险参保人员兴奋剂过量预测模型。","authors":"Tuhina Srivastava, Rebecca Arden Harris, Cheryl Bettigole, Hanxi Zhang, Colleen M Brensinger, Kacie Bogar, Fengge Wang, Elizabeth D Nesoff, Warren B Bilker, Sean Hennessy","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Overdoses involving methamphetamines and cocaine have increased in recent years. Identification of individuals at highest risk could facilitate the implementation of evidence-based interventions to reduce overdose risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and internally validate a model that predicts hospitalization or emergency department (ED) treatment for stimulant-involved overdose among the Medicaid-insured population.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a retrospective case-cohort study using Medicaid claims data from 2016 to 2019 (development) and 2020 (validation) for all Medicaid enrollees age 15 years or older with a cocaine- or other stimulant-involved overdose. A subcohort was created using a simple random sample of the full cohort of all cases. Within the full cohort, cases were identified as those having any inpatient or ED encounter for stimulant-involved overdose during the following year. A case-cohort sample was obtained for each calendar year from 2016 to 2020, each with a subcohort size of 100 000. Each individual contributed only 1 case event (for an individual with multiple overdoses, only the first eligible was selected). For each of the 4 overdose outcomes, a predictive weighted Cox model was first developed among enrollees of sampling years 2016 to 2019 (development set), and its performance was evaluated in our test set of 2020. The prediction models were first developed in November 2023, and the model fairness assessment was performed in April to May 2025.</p><p><strong>Interventions or exposures: </strong>Individual-level candidate predictors were demographic characteristics, enrollment, health care utilization, and other clinical variables. Area-level variables included social, economic, housing, and demographic characteristics data from the American Community Survey, rural-urban classification, Social Deprivation Index, retail opioid dispensing rates, and health resources.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Four types of stimulant-involved overdose associated with hospitalization or ED treatment: cocaine-involved overdose, (1) involving an opioid or (2) not involving an opioid; or methamphetamine-, ecstasy-, or other psychostimulant-involved overdose (hereafter, other stimulant), (3) involving an opioid or (4) not involving an opioid.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 78 795 enrollees with cocaine- and other stimulant-involved overdose (mean [SD] age, 42.2 [13.7] years; 33 304 [42%] female and 45 491 [58%] male individuals). Weighted Cox regression prediction models showed good calibration and high discriminatory performance (Harrell C statistic): cocaine-involved overdose, with (0.923) or without (0.902) an opioid; other stimulant-involved overdose, with (0.909) or without (0.868) an opioid. For cocaine-involved overdose with opioids, previous individual opioid use disorder diagnosis or cocaine use disorder diagnosis played the largest role in overdose risk prediction. For cocaine-involved overdose without opioids, previous cocaine use disorder diagnosis and area-level income inequality and housing variables contributed most to prediction. For other stimulant-involved overdose with opioids, previous opioid use disorder diagnosis and area-level percentage of those living with a disability contributed most to prediction. For other stimulant-involved overdoses without opioids, previous stimulant-related disorder and area-level proportion of individuals receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program contributed most to prediction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This case-cohort study found that readily available data can be used to identify those at high risk of hospitalization or ED visit for cocaine- or stimulant-involved overdose. These individuals would likely benefit most from evidence-based interventions and awareness of risk factors for overdose.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 9","pages":"e253489"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stimulant Overdose Prediction Model for Medicaid-Insured Persons.\",\"authors\":\"Tuhina Srivastava, Rebecca Arden Harris, Cheryl Bettigole, Hanxi Zhang, Colleen M Brensinger, Kacie Bogar, Fengge Wang, Elizabeth D Nesoff, Warren B Bilker, Sean Hennessy\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Overdoses involving methamphetamines and cocaine have increased in recent years. Identification of individuals at highest risk could facilitate the implementation of evidence-based interventions to reduce overdose risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and internally validate a model that predicts hospitalization or emergency department (ED) treatment for stimulant-involved overdose among the Medicaid-insured population.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a retrospective case-cohort study using Medicaid claims data from 2016 to 2019 (development) and 2020 (validation) for all Medicaid enrollees age 15 years or older with a cocaine- or other stimulant-involved overdose. A subcohort was created using a simple random sample of the full cohort of all cases. Within the full cohort, cases were identified as those having any inpatient or ED encounter for stimulant-involved overdose during the following year. A case-cohort sample was obtained for each calendar year from 2016 to 2020, each with a subcohort size of 100 000. Each individual contributed only 1 case event (for an individual with multiple overdoses, only the first eligible was selected). For each of the 4 overdose outcomes, a predictive weighted Cox model was first developed among enrollees of sampling years 2016 to 2019 (development set), and its performance was evaluated in our test set of 2020. The prediction models were first developed in November 2023, and the model fairness assessment was performed in April to May 2025.</p><p><strong>Interventions or exposures: </strong>Individual-level candidate predictors were demographic characteristics, enrollment, health care utilization, and other clinical variables. Area-level variables included social, economic, housing, and demographic characteristics data from the American Community Survey, rural-urban classification, Social Deprivation Index, retail opioid dispensing rates, and health resources.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Four types of stimulant-involved overdose associated with hospitalization or ED treatment: cocaine-involved overdose, (1) involving an opioid or (2) not involving an opioid; or methamphetamine-, ecstasy-, or other psychostimulant-involved overdose (hereafter, other stimulant), (3) involving an opioid or (4) not involving an opioid.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 78 795 enrollees with cocaine- and other stimulant-involved overdose (mean [SD] age, 42.2 [13.7] years; 33 304 [42%] female and 45 491 [58%] male individuals). Weighted Cox regression prediction models showed good calibration and high discriminatory performance (Harrell C statistic): cocaine-involved overdose, with (0.923) or without (0.902) an opioid; other stimulant-involved overdose, with (0.909) or without (0.868) an opioid. For cocaine-involved overdose with opioids, previous individual opioid use disorder diagnosis or cocaine use disorder diagnosis played the largest role in overdose risk prediction. For cocaine-involved overdose without opioids, previous cocaine use disorder diagnosis and area-level income inequality and housing variables contributed most to prediction. For other stimulant-involved overdose with opioids, previous opioid use disorder diagnosis and area-level percentage of those living with a disability contributed most to prediction. For other stimulant-involved overdoses without opioids, previous stimulant-related disorder and area-level proportion of individuals receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program contributed most to prediction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This case-cohort study found that readily available data can be used to identify those at high risk of hospitalization or ED visit for cocaine- or stimulant-involved overdose. These individuals would likely benefit most from evidence-based interventions and awareness of risk factors for overdose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"6 9\",\"pages\":\"e253489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449722/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:近年来,过量使用甲基苯丙胺和可卡因的情况有所增加。确定风险最高的个人可以促进实施循证干预措施,以减少过量风险。目的:开发和内部验证一个模型,预测住院或急诊部(ED)治疗过量的兴奋剂涉及医疗保险人群。设计、环境和参与者:这是一项回顾性病例队列研究,使用2016年至2019年(开发)和2020年(验证)的医疗补助索赔数据,研究对象是所有年龄在15岁或以上、过量服用可卡因或其他兴奋剂的医疗补助参保者。使用所有病例的完整队列的简单随机样本创建了一个亚队列。在整个队列中,病例被确定为在接下来的一年中因兴奋剂过量而住院或急诊的病例。从2016年到2020年,每个日历年获得一个病例队列样本,每个亚队列规模为100,000 000。每个个体仅贡献1例事件(对于多次过量用药的个体,仅选择第一个符合条件的病例)。对于4种药物过量结局,首先在2016年至2019年(开发集)的入组者中建立预测加权Cox模型,并在2020年的测试集中评估其性能。2023年11月首次建立预测模型,2025年4 - 5月进行模型公平性评估。干预或暴露:个人水平的候选预测因子是人口统计学特征、登记、医疗保健利用和其他临床变量。区域层面的变量包括来自美国社区调查的社会、经济、住房和人口特征数据、城乡分类、社会剥夺指数、零售阿片类药物配药率和卫生资源。主要结局和措施:与住院或ED治疗相关的四种兴奋剂过量:可卡因过量,(1)涉及阿片类药物或(2)不涉及阿片类药物;或甲基苯丙胺,摇头丸,或其他精神兴奋剂过量(以下简称其他兴奋剂),(3)涉及阿片类药物或(4)不涉及阿片类药物。结果:分析包括78 795名可卡因和其他兴奋剂过量的入组者(平均[SD]年龄42.2[13.7]岁;33 304[42%]名女性和45 491[58%]名男性)。加权Cox回归预测模型具有良好的校准性和高判别性能(Harrell C统计量):可卡因过量,含(0.923)或不含(0.902)阿片类药物;其他兴奋剂过量,含(0.909)或不含(0.868)阿片类药物。对于可卡因相关阿片类药物过量,既往个体阿片类药物使用障碍诊断或可卡因使用障碍诊断对过量风险预测作用最大。对于无阿片类药物的可卡因过量,以前的可卡因使用障碍诊断、地区收入不平等和住房变量对预测贡献最大。对于其他涉及阿片类药物过量的兴奋剂,以前的阿片类药物使用障碍诊断和残疾人的区域水平百分比对预测贡献最大。对于非阿片类药物的其他兴奋剂过量,既往兴奋剂相关障碍和接受补充营养援助计划的个体的区域水平比例对预测贡献最大。结论和相关性:本病例队列研究发现,可利用的数据可用于识别因可卡因或兴奋剂过量而住院或急诊的高危人群。这些人可能会从基于证据的干预措施和对过量风险因素的认识中获益最多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Stimulant Overdose Prediction Model for Medicaid-Insured Persons.

Stimulant Overdose Prediction Model for Medicaid-Insured Persons.

Importance: Overdoses involving methamphetamines and cocaine have increased in recent years. Identification of individuals at highest risk could facilitate the implementation of evidence-based interventions to reduce overdose risk.

Objective: To develop and internally validate a model that predicts hospitalization or emergency department (ED) treatment for stimulant-involved overdose among the Medicaid-insured population.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a retrospective case-cohort study using Medicaid claims data from 2016 to 2019 (development) and 2020 (validation) for all Medicaid enrollees age 15 years or older with a cocaine- or other stimulant-involved overdose. A subcohort was created using a simple random sample of the full cohort of all cases. Within the full cohort, cases were identified as those having any inpatient or ED encounter for stimulant-involved overdose during the following year. A case-cohort sample was obtained for each calendar year from 2016 to 2020, each with a subcohort size of 100 000. Each individual contributed only 1 case event (for an individual with multiple overdoses, only the first eligible was selected). For each of the 4 overdose outcomes, a predictive weighted Cox model was first developed among enrollees of sampling years 2016 to 2019 (development set), and its performance was evaluated in our test set of 2020. The prediction models were first developed in November 2023, and the model fairness assessment was performed in April to May 2025.

Interventions or exposures: Individual-level candidate predictors were demographic characteristics, enrollment, health care utilization, and other clinical variables. Area-level variables included social, economic, housing, and demographic characteristics data from the American Community Survey, rural-urban classification, Social Deprivation Index, retail opioid dispensing rates, and health resources.

Main outcomes and measures: Four types of stimulant-involved overdose associated with hospitalization or ED treatment: cocaine-involved overdose, (1) involving an opioid or (2) not involving an opioid; or methamphetamine-, ecstasy-, or other psychostimulant-involved overdose (hereafter, other stimulant), (3) involving an opioid or (4) not involving an opioid.

Results: The analysis included 78 795 enrollees with cocaine- and other stimulant-involved overdose (mean [SD] age, 42.2 [13.7] years; 33 304 [42%] female and 45 491 [58%] male individuals). Weighted Cox regression prediction models showed good calibration and high discriminatory performance (Harrell C statistic): cocaine-involved overdose, with (0.923) or without (0.902) an opioid; other stimulant-involved overdose, with (0.909) or without (0.868) an opioid. For cocaine-involved overdose with opioids, previous individual opioid use disorder diagnosis or cocaine use disorder diagnosis played the largest role in overdose risk prediction. For cocaine-involved overdose without opioids, previous cocaine use disorder diagnosis and area-level income inequality and housing variables contributed most to prediction. For other stimulant-involved overdose with opioids, previous opioid use disorder diagnosis and area-level percentage of those living with a disability contributed most to prediction. For other stimulant-involved overdoses without opioids, previous stimulant-related disorder and area-level proportion of individuals receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program contributed most to prediction.

Conclusions and relevance: This case-cohort study found that readily available data can be used to identify those at high risk of hospitalization or ED visit for cocaine- or stimulant-involved overdose. These individuals would likely benefit most from evidence-based interventions and awareness of risk factors for overdose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信