Jacob Duncan, Andrew V Tran, Ryan Witt, Annes Elfar, Matthew Rashid, Matt Vassar
{"title":"扰乱药物成本:成本加成定价在减少高血压治疗医疗保险支出中的作用。","authors":"Jacob Duncan, Andrew V Tran, Ryan Witt, Annes Elfar, Matthew Rashid, Matt Vassar","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess potential Medicare cost savings if Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company (MCCPDC) pricing were applied to antihypertensive medications.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis comparing Medicare Part D spending with MCCPDC pricing for selected antihypertensive drugs.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>Eighty-seven antihypertensive medications were compared between Medicare Part D and MCCPDC. Volume-adjusted expenditure estimates were calculated under three scenarios: (1) applying MCCPDC prices to all medications, (2) applying MCCPDC prices only to drugs priced lower than Medicare, and (3) applying MCCPDC prices to guideline-recommended first-line therapies.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>In 2022, Medicare spent $4.9 billion on the included medications. Of these, 39 of the 30-count and 58 of the 90-count medications showed cost savings under MCCPDC pricing. Estimated savings totaled $670.1 million (30-count) and $1.4 billion (90-count). Among 47 first-line agents, MCCPDC pricing produced estimated savings of $222.6 million (30-count) and $584.1 million (90-count). The average 90-count price reduction was 23.2% overall and 21.1% among first-line therapies, with several agents showing substantial price advantages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adopting MCCPDC pricing could reduce Medicare costs for antihypertensive drugs, especially through 90-count supplies and first-line therapies. Targeted implementation-focusing on medications with clear cost and clinical advantages-may yield meaningful savings. These results support broader policy efforts to incorporate transparent, value-based drug pricing models into Medicare.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70045"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disrupting Drug Costs: The Role of Cost-Plus Pricing in Reducing Medicare Spending on Hypertension Treatments.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Duncan, Andrew V Tran, Ryan Witt, Annes Elfar, Matthew Rashid, Matt Vassar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6773.70045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess potential Medicare cost savings if Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company (MCCPDC) pricing were applied to antihypertensive medications.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis comparing Medicare Part D spending with MCCPDC pricing for selected antihypertensive drugs.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>Eighty-seven antihypertensive medications were compared between Medicare Part D and MCCPDC. Volume-adjusted expenditure estimates were calculated under three scenarios: (1) applying MCCPDC prices to all medications, (2) applying MCCPDC prices only to drugs priced lower than Medicare, and (3) applying MCCPDC prices to guideline-recommended first-line therapies.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>In 2022, Medicare spent $4.9 billion on the included medications. Of these, 39 of the 30-count and 58 of the 90-count medications showed cost savings under MCCPDC pricing. Estimated savings totaled $670.1 million (30-count) and $1.4 billion (90-count). Among 47 first-line agents, MCCPDC pricing produced estimated savings of $222.6 million (30-count) and $584.1 million (90-count). The average 90-count price reduction was 23.2% overall and 21.1% among first-line therapies, with several agents showing substantial price advantages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adopting MCCPDC pricing could reduce Medicare costs for antihypertensive drugs, especially through 90-count supplies and first-line therapies. Targeted implementation-focusing on medications with clear cost and clinical advantages-may yield meaningful savings. These results support broader policy efforts to incorporate transparent, value-based drug pricing models into Medicare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70045\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70045\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disrupting Drug Costs: The Role of Cost-Plus Pricing in Reducing Medicare Spending on Hypertension Treatments.
Objective: To assess potential Medicare cost savings if Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company (MCCPDC) pricing were applied to antihypertensive medications.
Study setting and design: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis comparing Medicare Part D spending with MCCPDC pricing for selected antihypertensive drugs.
Data sources and analytic sample: Eighty-seven antihypertensive medications were compared between Medicare Part D and MCCPDC. Volume-adjusted expenditure estimates were calculated under three scenarios: (1) applying MCCPDC prices to all medications, (2) applying MCCPDC prices only to drugs priced lower than Medicare, and (3) applying MCCPDC prices to guideline-recommended first-line therapies.
Principal findings: In 2022, Medicare spent $4.9 billion on the included medications. Of these, 39 of the 30-count and 58 of the 90-count medications showed cost savings under MCCPDC pricing. Estimated savings totaled $670.1 million (30-count) and $1.4 billion (90-count). Among 47 first-line agents, MCCPDC pricing produced estimated savings of $222.6 million (30-count) and $584.1 million (90-count). The average 90-count price reduction was 23.2% overall and 21.1% among first-line therapies, with several agents showing substantial price advantages.
Conclusion: Adopting MCCPDC pricing could reduce Medicare costs for antihypertensive drugs, especially through 90-count supplies and first-line therapies. Targeted implementation-focusing on medications with clear cost and clinical advantages-may yield meaningful savings. These results support broader policy efforts to incorporate transparent, value-based drug pricing models into Medicare.
期刊介绍:
Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.