从评估到行动:一项整体诊断提高工作能力有效性的随机对照试验。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-09-18 DOI:10.1055/a-2663-0460
David Fauser, Saskia Dötsch, Jessica Roder, Vera Kleineke, Dagmar Feddersen, Gregor Usdrowski, Matthias Bethge
{"title":"从评估到行动:一项整体诊断提高工作能力有效性的随机对照试验。","authors":"David Fauser, Saskia Dötsch, Jessica Roder, Vera Kleineke, Dagmar Feddersen, Gregor Usdrowski, Matthias Bethge","doi":"10.1055/a-2663-0460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Employees can benefit from multimodal work-related intervention strategies. This randomised controlled trial tested the effectiveness of an integrative diagnostic service used to clarify intervention needs of employees with endangered work participation (German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00027577).Employees with health restrictions and limited work ability were included and received an initial consultation with their occupational health physician. With computer-generated allocation lists, they were randomised to the treatment arms. The intervention group (IG) immediately attended a two-day assessment in a rehabilitation centre and then received follow-up consultations at the workplace. The control group (CG) started the two-day assessment six months after randomisation. Questionnaire data were collected from participants at their initial consultation and after six months. The primary outcome was the subjective work ability of the participants (Work Ability Score; 0-10 points). Secondary outcome measures included working conditions and sick leave duration.Data from 61 participants (IG: n=32) were analysed. A clinically important but statistically nonsignificant difference was found between IG and CG, including a moderate effect size for work ability (difference=1.15: 95% CI: -0.05 to 2.35; p=0.061). Clinically relevant differences were observed for sick leave duration in weeks (difference=-4.00: 95% CI: -7.49 to -0.51; p=0.025) and job insecurity (difference: -16.40; 95% CI: -29.82 to -2.99; p=0.017).Our results suggest that the intervention led to a reduction in sick leave and improvements in job security and work ability. The effectiveness of the intervention depends largely upon whether the needs of individuals and the requirements of workplaces are taken into consideration. Participants could be selected by occupational physicians on the basis of the occupational skill level. Further research should consider the long-term effects and health economic analyses and structural requirements for a nationwide implementation, as well as employers' perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From assessment to action: A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of a holistic diagnostic to enhance work ability.\",\"authors\":\"David Fauser, Saskia Dötsch, Jessica Roder, Vera Kleineke, Dagmar Feddersen, Gregor Usdrowski, Matthias Bethge\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2663-0460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Employees can benefit from multimodal work-related intervention strategies. This randomised controlled trial tested the effectiveness of an integrative diagnostic service used to clarify intervention needs of employees with endangered work participation (German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00027577).Employees with health restrictions and limited work ability were included and received an initial consultation with their occupational health physician. With computer-generated allocation lists, they were randomised to the treatment arms. The intervention group (IG) immediately attended a two-day assessment in a rehabilitation centre and then received follow-up consultations at the workplace. The control group (CG) started the two-day assessment six months after randomisation. Questionnaire data were collected from participants at their initial consultation and after six months. The primary outcome was the subjective work ability of the participants (Work Ability Score; 0-10 points). Secondary outcome measures included working conditions and sick leave duration.Data from 61 participants (IG: n=32) were analysed. A clinically important but statistically nonsignificant difference was found between IG and CG, including a moderate effect size for work ability (difference=1.15: 95% CI: -0.05 to 2.35; p=0.061). Clinically relevant differences were observed for sick leave duration in weeks (difference=-4.00: 95% CI: -7.49 to -0.51; p=0.025) and job insecurity (difference: -16.40; 95% CI: -29.82 to -2.99; p=0.017).Our results suggest that the intervention led to a reduction in sick leave and improvements in job security and work ability. The effectiveness of the intervention depends largely upon whether the needs of individuals and the requirements of workplaces are taken into consideration. Participants could be selected by occupational physicians on the basis of the occupational skill level. Further research should consider the long-term effects and health economic analyses and structural requirements for a nationwide implementation, as well as employers' perspectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2663-0460\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2663-0460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

员工可以从多模式工作相关干预策略中受益。这项随机对照试验测试了一种综合诊断服务的有效性,该服务用于澄清工作参与受到威胁的员工的干预需求(德国临床试验注册:DRKS00027577)。有健康问题和工作能力有限的雇员也包括在内,并接受了职业健康医生的初步咨询。根据计算机生成的分配列表,他们被随机分配到治疗组。干预组(IG)立即在康复中心参加了为期两天的评估,然后在工作场所接受了后续咨询。对照组(CG)在随机分组后6个月开始为期两天的评估。调查问卷收集了参与者最初咨询时和六个月后的数据。主要结果是参与者的主观工作能力(工作能力得分;0-10分)。次要结果测量包括工作条件和病假时间。分析了61名参与者(IG: n=32)的数据。IG和CG之间存在临床重要但统计学上不显著的差异,包括对工作能力的中等效应大小(差异=1.15;95% CI: -0.05至2.35;p=0.061)。以周为单位的病假时间(差异=-4.00:95% CI: -7.49至-0.51;p=0.025)和工作不安全感(差异:-16.40;95% CI: -29.82至-2.99;p=0.017)存在临床相关差异。我们的研究结果表明,干预导致病假减少,工作保障和工作能力的提高。干预的有效性在很大程度上取决于是否考虑到个人的需要和工作场所的要求。参加者可由职业医师根据其职业技能水平选择。进一步的研究应考虑到长期影响、卫生经济分析和全国实施的结构要求以及雇主的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From assessment to action: A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of a holistic diagnostic to enhance work ability.

Employees can benefit from multimodal work-related intervention strategies. This randomised controlled trial tested the effectiveness of an integrative diagnostic service used to clarify intervention needs of employees with endangered work participation (German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00027577).Employees with health restrictions and limited work ability were included and received an initial consultation with their occupational health physician. With computer-generated allocation lists, they were randomised to the treatment arms. The intervention group (IG) immediately attended a two-day assessment in a rehabilitation centre and then received follow-up consultations at the workplace. The control group (CG) started the two-day assessment six months after randomisation. Questionnaire data were collected from participants at their initial consultation and after six months. The primary outcome was the subjective work ability of the participants (Work Ability Score; 0-10 points). Secondary outcome measures included working conditions and sick leave duration.Data from 61 participants (IG: n=32) were analysed. A clinically important but statistically nonsignificant difference was found between IG and CG, including a moderate effect size for work ability (difference=1.15: 95% CI: -0.05 to 2.35; p=0.061). Clinically relevant differences were observed for sick leave duration in weeks (difference=-4.00: 95% CI: -7.49 to -0.51; p=0.025) and job insecurity (difference: -16.40; 95% CI: -29.82 to -2.99; p=0.017).Our results suggest that the intervention led to a reduction in sick leave and improvements in job security and work ability. The effectiveness of the intervention depends largely upon whether the needs of individuals and the requirements of workplaces are taken into consideration. Participants could be selected by occupational physicians on the basis of the occupational skill level. Further research should consider the long-term effects and health economic analyses and structural requirements for a nationwide implementation, as well as employers' perspectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift Die Rehabilitation richtet sich an Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter in Einrichtungen, Forschungsinstitutionen und Trägern der Rehabilitation. Sie berichtet über die medizinischen, gesetzlichen, politischen und gesellschaftlichen Grundlagen und Rahmenbedingungen der Rehabilitation und über internationale Entwicklungen auf diesem Gebiet. Schwerpunkte sind dabei Beiträge zu Rehabilitationspraxis (medizinische, berufliche und soziale Rehabilitation, Qualitätsmanagement, neue Konzepte und Versorgungsmodelle zur Anwendung der ICF, Bewegungstherapie etc.), Rehabilitationsforschung (praxisrelevante Ergebnisse, Methoden und Assessments, Leitlinienentwicklung, sozialmedizinische Fragen), Public Health, Sozialmedizin Gesundheits-System-Forschung sowie die daraus resultierenden Probleme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信