[促进肌肉骨骼疾病患者门诊与住院工作相关医疗康复(WMR)的工作参与:使用管理数据的分析]。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-09-18 DOI:10.1055/a-2679-7982
David Bühne, Christian Hetzel, Mathis Elling, Torsten Alles
{"title":"[促进肌肉骨骼疾病患者门诊与住院工作相关医疗康复(WMR)的工作参与:使用管理数据的分析]。","authors":"David Bühne, Christian Hetzel, Mathis Elling, Torsten Alles","doi":"10.1055/a-2679-7982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the present study was to compare outpatient vs. inpatient work-related medical rehabilitation (WMR) with regard to treatment dose of work-related interventions and promotion of work participation.The rehabilitation statistics database of the German Pension Insurance was used. Patients were included if they had completed WMR for musculoskeletal disorders in 2018 or 2019 and were aged up to 63 years. The implementation of WMR was measured based on work-related interventions documented in the discharge report.The sample consisted of 46,276 rehabilitants. Work-related interventions were documented with an average total duration of 8.2 (outpatient WMR) and 9.3 (inpatient WMR) hours. In 25.7% of the outpatient and 37.1% of the inpatient rehabilitants, the minimum total duration of 11 hours was met. With regard to the promotion of occupational participation, no significant difference was observed between inpatient and outpatient WMR (OR=0.96, 95% CI [0.90, 1.03], reference: inpatient WMR), suggesting a potentially comparable benefit.The need for WMR measures was not consistently met in either outpatient or inpatient rehabilitation. In both settings, people assigned to WMR predominantly received less work-related interventions than intended. The promotion of return to work was achieved with comparable effectiveness in both outpatient and inpatient WMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Promotion of Work Participation in Outpatient vs. Inpatient Work-Related Medical Rehabilitation (WMR) in Patients with Musculoskeletal Disorders: Analyses Using Administrative Data].\",\"authors\":\"David Bühne, Christian Hetzel, Mathis Elling, Torsten Alles\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2679-7982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of the present study was to compare outpatient vs. inpatient work-related medical rehabilitation (WMR) with regard to treatment dose of work-related interventions and promotion of work participation.The rehabilitation statistics database of the German Pension Insurance was used. Patients were included if they had completed WMR for musculoskeletal disorders in 2018 or 2019 and were aged up to 63 years. The implementation of WMR was measured based on work-related interventions documented in the discharge report.The sample consisted of 46,276 rehabilitants. Work-related interventions were documented with an average total duration of 8.2 (outpatient WMR) and 9.3 (inpatient WMR) hours. In 25.7% of the outpatient and 37.1% of the inpatient rehabilitants, the minimum total duration of 11 hours was met. With regard to the promotion of occupational participation, no significant difference was observed between inpatient and outpatient WMR (OR=0.96, 95% CI [0.90, 1.03], reference: inpatient WMR), suggesting a potentially comparable benefit.The need for WMR measures was not consistently met in either outpatient or inpatient rehabilitation. In both settings, people assigned to WMR predominantly received less work-related interventions than intended. The promotion of return to work was achieved with comparable effectiveness in both outpatient and inpatient WMR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2679-7982\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2679-7982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较门诊与住院与工作相关的医疗康复(WMR)在与工作相关的干预治疗剂量和促进工作参与方面的差异。使用德国养恤金保险的康复统计数据库。如果患者在2018年或2019年完成了肌肉骨骼疾病的WMR,并且年龄不超过63岁,则纳入研究。根据出院报告中记录的与工作相关的干预措施来衡量WMR的实施情况。样本包括46,276名康复者。与工作相关的干预措施记录的平均总持续时间为8.2(门诊WMR)和9.3(住院WMR)小时。在25.7%的门诊患者和37.1%的住院康复患者中,最低总时间为11小时。在促进职业参与方面,住院患者和门诊患者的WMR之间没有显著差异(OR=0.96, 95% CI[0.90, 1.03],参考文献:住院患者的WMR),表明潜在的可比获益。无论是门诊还是住院康复,对WMR测量的需求都没有得到一致的满足。在这两种情况下,分配到WMR的人主要接受的与工作相关的干预少于预期。在门诊和住院WMR中,促进重返工作岗位的效果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Promotion of Work Participation in Outpatient vs. Inpatient Work-Related Medical Rehabilitation (WMR) in Patients with Musculoskeletal Disorders: Analyses Using Administrative Data].

The aim of the present study was to compare outpatient vs. inpatient work-related medical rehabilitation (WMR) with regard to treatment dose of work-related interventions and promotion of work participation.The rehabilitation statistics database of the German Pension Insurance was used. Patients were included if they had completed WMR for musculoskeletal disorders in 2018 or 2019 and were aged up to 63 years. The implementation of WMR was measured based on work-related interventions documented in the discharge report.The sample consisted of 46,276 rehabilitants. Work-related interventions were documented with an average total duration of 8.2 (outpatient WMR) and 9.3 (inpatient WMR) hours. In 25.7% of the outpatient and 37.1% of the inpatient rehabilitants, the minimum total duration of 11 hours was met. With regard to the promotion of occupational participation, no significant difference was observed between inpatient and outpatient WMR (OR=0.96, 95% CI [0.90, 1.03], reference: inpatient WMR), suggesting a potentially comparable benefit.The need for WMR measures was not consistently met in either outpatient or inpatient rehabilitation. In both settings, people assigned to WMR predominantly received less work-related interventions than intended. The promotion of return to work was achieved with comparable effectiveness in both outpatient and inpatient WMR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift Die Rehabilitation richtet sich an Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter in Einrichtungen, Forschungsinstitutionen und Trägern der Rehabilitation. Sie berichtet über die medizinischen, gesetzlichen, politischen und gesellschaftlichen Grundlagen und Rahmenbedingungen der Rehabilitation und über internationale Entwicklungen auf diesem Gebiet. Schwerpunkte sind dabei Beiträge zu Rehabilitationspraxis (medizinische, berufliche und soziale Rehabilitation, Qualitätsmanagement, neue Konzepte und Versorgungsmodelle zur Anwendung der ICF, Bewegungstherapie etc.), Rehabilitationsforschung (praxisrelevante Ergebnisse, Methoden und Assessments, Leitlinienentwicklung, sozialmedizinische Fragen), Public Health, Sozialmedizin Gesundheits-System-Forschung sowie die daraus resultierenden Probleme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信