医学影像和放射治疗临床教师的职业倦怠。

IF 0.5 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiologic Technology Pub Date : 2025-07-01
Amanda Paige Hanstein, Jennifer Daniels, Jenny Gilmore, Jonathan D Baldwin, Linda Ma
{"title":"医学影像和放射治疗临床教师的职业倦怠。","authors":"Amanda Paige Hanstein, Jennifer Daniels, Jenny Gilmore, Jonathan D Baldwin, Linda Ma","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess workplace burnout among medical imaging and radiation therapy clinical faculty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic nonprobability-based survey was sent to clinical faculty in the Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center. The survey included demographic questions and Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) questions, which survey symptoms of burnout. Responses were scored, and the OLBI scores were compared among clinical faculty specializing in 4 disciplines (radiography, nuclear medicine technology, radiation therapy, and sonography) and with varying years of experience in their field. Exploratory linear regression models were constructed to examine associations between demographic variables and OLBI scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of variance results found no differences between OLBI scores of faculty specializing in various disciplines or with differing years of experience. However, the linear regression models indicated associations with age, length of time participants planned to work in the field, discipline (when defined as sonography vs other disciplines), supervisory status, and sex.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Mean OLBI scores for the clinical faculty were: 38.6 for nuclear medicine technologists, 38.9 for radiation therapists, 41.3 for radiographers, and 42.0 for sonographers. Participants younger than 40 years reported higher burnout levels compared with those aged 40 years or older. In addition, sonographers reported higher burnout levels compared with all other disciplines combined.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study are exploratory but can inform future studies. Future research should investigate whether age affects burnout among medical imaging and radiation therapy professionals and how burnout can be mitigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":51772,"journal":{"name":"Radiologic Technology","volume":"96 6","pages":"415-427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Burnout in Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy Clinical Faculty.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Paige Hanstein, Jennifer Daniels, Jenny Gilmore, Jonathan D Baldwin, Linda Ma\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess workplace burnout among medical imaging and radiation therapy clinical faculty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic nonprobability-based survey was sent to clinical faculty in the Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center. The survey included demographic questions and Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) questions, which survey symptoms of burnout. Responses were scored, and the OLBI scores were compared among clinical faculty specializing in 4 disciplines (radiography, nuclear medicine technology, radiation therapy, and sonography) and with varying years of experience in their field. Exploratory linear regression models were constructed to examine associations between demographic variables and OLBI scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of variance results found no differences between OLBI scores of faculty specializing in various disciplines or with differing years of experience. However, the linear regression models indicated associations with age, length of time participants planned to work in the field, discipline (when defined as sonography vs other disciplines), supervisory status, and sex.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Mean OLBI scores for the clinical faculty were: 38.6 for nuclear medicine technologists, 38.9 for radiation therapists, 41.3 for radiographers, and 42.0 for sonographers. Participants younger than 40 years reported higher burnout levels compared with those aged 40 years or older. In addition, sonographers reported higher burnout levels compared with all other disciplines combined.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study are exploratory but can inform future studies. Future research should investigate whether age affects burnout among medical imaging and radiation therapy professionals and how burnout can be mitigated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologic Technology\",\"volume\":\"96 6\",\"pages\":\"415-427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologic Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解医学影像与放射治疗临床医师的工作倦怠状况。方法:向俄克拉何马大学健康科学中心医学成像与辐射科学系的临床教师发送电子非概率调查。调查包括人口统计问题和奥尔登堡倦怠量表(OLBI)问题,调查倦怠症状。对回答进行评分,并比较4个学科(放射照相、核医学技术、放射治疗和超声)的临床教师的OLBI评分,这些教师在各自领域的经验年限不同。建立探索性线性回归模型来检验人口统计变量与OLBI评分之间的关系。结果:方差分析结果发现,不同学科专业或不同经验年限的教师的OLBI分数没有差异。然而,线性回归模型显示与年龄、参与者计划在该领域工作的时间长度、学科(当定义为超声与其他学科时)、监督地位和性别有关。讨论:临床教师的平均OLBI评分为:核医学技师38.6分,放射治疗师38.9分,放射技师41.3分,超声技师42.0分。与40岁或以上的参与者相比,40岁以下的参与者报告的倦怠程度更高。此外,与所有其他学科的总和相比,超声医师报告的倦怠程度更高。结论:本研究的结果是探索性的,但可以为未来的研究提供信息。未来的研究应该调查年龄是否会影响医学成像和放射治疗专业人员的职业倦怠,以及如何减轻职业倦怠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Burnout in Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy Clinical Faculty.

Purpose: To assess workplace burnout among medical imaging and radiation therapy clinical faculty.

Methods: An electronic nonprobability-based survey was sent to clinical faculty in the Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center. The survey included demographic questions and Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) questions, which survey symptoms of burnout. Responses were scored, and the OLBI scores were compared among clinical faculty specializing in 4 disciplines (radiography, nuclear medicine technology, radiation therapy, and sonography) and with varying years of experience in their field. Exploratory linear regression models were constructed to examine associations between demographic variables and OLBI scores.

Results: Analysis of variance results found no differences between OLBI scores of faculty specializing in various disciplines or with differing years of experience. However, the linear regression models indicated associations with age, length of time participants planned to work in the field, discipline (when defined as sonography vs other disciplines), supervisory status, and sex.

Discussion: Mean OLBI scores for the clinical faculty were: 38.6 for nuclear medicine technologists, 38.9 for radiation therapists, 41.3 for radiographers, and 42.0 for sonographers. Participants younger than 40 years reported higher burnout levels compared with those aged 40 years or older. In addition, sonographers reported higher burnout levels compared with all other disciplines combined.

Conclusion: The results of this study are exploratory but can inform future studies. Future research should investigate whether age affects burnout among medical imaging and radiation therapy professionals and how burnout can be mitigated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologic Technology
Radiologic Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Radiologic Technology is an official scholarly journal of the American Society of Radiologic Technologists. Published continuously since 1929, it circulates to more than 145,000 readers worldwide. This award-winning bimonthly Journal covers all disciplines and specialties within medical imaging, including radiography, mammography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine imaging, sonography and cardiovascular-interventional radiography. In addition to peer-reviewed research articles, Radi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信