心衰在指南指导下的药物治疗与恶性肿瘤的死亡率比较:一份来自全球联邦研究网络的报告

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-10-07 Epub Date: 2025-09-19 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.125.044046
Luca Monzo, Guillaume Baudry, Kevin Duarte, Gema Hernandez, Olivier Denquin, Gianluigi Savarese, Nicolas Girerd
{"title":"心衰在指南指导下的药物治疗与恶性肿瘤的死亡率比较:一份来自全球联邦研究网络的报告","authors":"Luca Monzo, Guillaume Baudry, Kevin Duarte, Gema Hernandez, Olivier Denquin, Gianluigi Savarese, Nicolas Girerd","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.125.044046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), including angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, has significantly improved outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We examined whether modern GDMT alters the historically observed parity in mortality between HF and cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the TriNetX Global Collaborative Research Network (2015-2024), we identified 32 125 patients with HFrEF on GDMT (angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, beta blockers, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors), 403 389 not on full GDMT (not receiving all 4 drugs concurrently), and 2 481 106 with malignant cancers. All-cause mortality was compared between HFrEF and cancer overall and across the most common cancers in men (prostate, colorectal, lung) and women (breast, lung, colorectal) using propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with HFrEF on GDMT with angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors had significantly better survival than patients with cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44 [95% CI, 0.41-0.47]; <i>P</i><0.001). A survival benefit, though less pronounced, was also seen for GDMT with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors instead of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.57-0.69]; <i>P</i><0.001). Patients not on GDMT had higher mortality than patients with cancer (HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.13-1.17]; <i>P</i><0.001). Among the most common sex-specific cancers, only patients with prostate and breast cancer had better survival than those with HFrEF on GDMT, whereas patients not on GDMT showed worse outcomes across most cancers, except lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large real-world analysis, patients with HFrEF on GDMT showed better survival than those with cancer overall and across most sex-specific cancers. Patients not on GDMT experienced worse outcomes, emphasizing the need to optimize treatment in HFrEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e044046"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Mortality in Heart Failure on Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Versus Malignant Cancer: A Report From a Global Federated Research Network.\",\"authors\":\"Luca Monzo, Guillaume Baudry, Kevin Duarte, Gema Hernandez, Olivier Denquin, Gianluigi Savarese, Nicolas Girerd\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/JAHA.125.044046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), including angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, has significantly improved outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We examined whether modern GDMT alters the historically observed parity in mortality between HF and cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the TriNetX Global Collaborative Research Network (2015-2024), we identified 32 125 patients with HFrEF on GDMT (angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, beta blockers, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors), 403 389 not on full GDMT (not receiving all 4 drugs concurrently), and 2 481 106 with malignant cancers. All-cause mortality was compared between HFrEF and cancer overall and across the most common cancers in men (prostate, colorectal, lung) and women (breast, lung, colorectal) using propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with HFrEF on GDMT with angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors had significantly better survival than patients with cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44 [95% CI, 0.41-0.47]; <i>P</i><0.001). A survival benefit, though less pronounced, was also seen for GDMT with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors instead of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.57-0.69]; <i>P</i><0.001). Patients not on GDMT had higher mortality than patients with cancer (HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.13-1.17]; <i>P</i><0.001). Among the most common sex-specific cancers, only patients with prostate and breast cancer had better survival than those with HFrEF on GDMT, whereas patients not on GDMT showed worse outcomes across most cancers, except lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large real-world analysis, patients with HFrEF on GDMT showed better survival than those with cancer overall and across most sex-specific cancers. Patients not on GDMT experienced worse outcomes, emphasizing the need to optimize treatment in HFrEF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e044046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.125.044046\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.125.044046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:指南导向的药物治疗(GDMT),包括血管紧张素受体-neprilysin抑制剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、受体阻滞剂、矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂,可显著改善心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者的预后。我们研究了现代GDMT是否改变了历史上观察到的心衰和癌症之间的死亡率平价。方法:从TriNetX全球合作研究网络(2015-2024)中,我们确定了32125例接受GDMT(血管紧张素受体-neprilysin抑制剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂、受体阻滞剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂)治疗的HFrEF患者,40389例未完全接受GDMT治疗(未同时接受所有4种药物),248106例恶性肿瘤患者。使用倾向评分匹配法比较了HFrEF和癌症的全因死亡率,以及男性(前列腺癌、结直肠癌、肺癌)和女性(乳腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌)中最常见的癌症。结论:在这项大型现实世界分析中,接受GDMT治疗的HFrEF患者总体上和大多数性别特异性癌症患者的生存率都高于接受GDMT治疗的癌症患者(风险比[HR], 0.44 [95% CI, 0.41-0.47])。未接受GDMT治疗的患者预后更差,这强调了优化HFrEF治疗的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Mortality in Heart Failure on Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Versus Malignant Cancer: A Report From a Global Federated Research Network.

Background: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), including angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, has significantly improved outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We examined whether modern GDMT alters the historically observed parity in mortality between HF and cancer.

Methods: From the TriNetX Global Collaborative Research Network (2015-2024), we identified 32 125 patients with HFrEF on GDMT (angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, beta blockers, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors), 403 389 not on full GDMT (not receiving all 4 drugs concurrently), and 2 481 106 with malignant cancers. All-cause mortality was compared between HFrEF and cancer overall and across the most common cancers in men (prostate, colorectal, lung) and women (breast, lung, colorectal) using propensity score matching.

Results: Patients with HFrEF on GDMT with angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors had significantly better survival than patients with cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44 [95% CI, 0.41-0.47]; P<0.001). A survival benefit, though less pronounced, was also seen for GDMT with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors instead of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.57-0.69]; P<0.001). Patients not on GDMT had higher mortality than patients with cancer (HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.13-1.17]; P<0.001). Among the most common sex-specific cancers, only patients with prostate and breast cancer had better survival than those with HFrEF on GDMT, whereas patients not on GDMT showed worse outcomes across most cancers, except lung cancer.

Conclusions: In this large real-world analysis, patients with HFrEF on GDMT showed better survival than those with cancer overall and across most sex-specific cancers. Patients not on GDMT experienced worse outcomes, emphasizing the need to optimize treatment in HFrEF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信