脑血管卒中成像和颈动脉血运重建术的差异:一项人群研究。

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-10-07 Epub Date: 2025-09-19 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.125.043715
Harshil Shah, Tina He, Naomi Dyck, Jillian Stang, Dana Nicol, Christiane J McIntosh, Stephen B Wilton, Shelagh B Coutts, Nishita Singh, Michael D Hill, Aravind Ganesh
{"title":"脑血管卒中成像和颈动脉血运重建术的差异:一项人群研究。","authors":"Harshil Shah, Tina He, Naomi Dyck, Jillian Stang, Dana Nicol, Christiane J McIntosh, Stephen B Wilton, Shelagh B Coutts, Nishita Singh, Michael D Hill, Aravind Ganesh","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.125.043715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decisions on imaging with computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, and ultrasound in stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) may be influenced by factors ranging from location-based resource considerations to patient characteristics. We investigated disparities in vascular imaging utilization and carotid revascularization over 7 years in a Canadian province (Alberta, population: 4.4 million).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used provincial administrative data encompassing patients presenting to hospital or emergency/urgent-care facilities with TIA or ischemic stroke from April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2023. We related the vascular imaging received to year, age, sex, event diagnosis, comorbidities, distance to a comprehensive stroke center, region, and stroke center type using mixed-effects logistic regressions. We similarly examined disparities in imaging for recurrent events and in receipt of carotid endarterectomy/stenting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 47 963 patients (median age, 72, interquartile range, 61-82, 47.6% female) with stroke/TIA, patients who were female, older, and experienced minor stroke/TIA (versus major stroke) had lower odds of receiving computed tomography angiography or any neurovascular imaging, as did those presenting to nonstroke centers or rural sites (eg, 35.8% rural versus 75.3% urban, adjusted odds ratio [any imaging]:0.56, 95% CI, 0.34-0.94). Odds of receiving vascular imaging increased over time, including computed tomography angiography (2016:49.1% versus 2023:79.9%, adjusted odds ratio per-year since 2015 [computed tomography angiography], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.16-1.19]). Female sex and absent neurovascular imaging carried lower odds of carotid revascularization (2.4% female versus 4.4% male, adjusted odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.52-0.63]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite increasing utilization of neurovascular imaging, patients who are female, older, rural, or with minor stroke/TIA remain less likely to receive neurovascular imaging, with expected implications for receiving carotid revascularization. Female patients are less likely to undergo carotid revascularization even after accounting for receipt of imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"eJAHA2025043715T"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study.\",\"authors\":\"Harshil Shah, Tina He, Naomi Dyck, Jillian Stang, Dana Nicol, Christiane J McIntosh, Stephen B Wilton, Shelagh B Coutts, Nishita Singh, Michael D Hill, Aravind Ganesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/JAHA.125.043715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decisions on imaging with computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, and ultrasound in stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) may be influenced by factors ranging from location-based resource considerations to patient characteristics. We investigated disparities in vascular imaging utilization and carotid revascularization over 7 years in a Canadian province (Alberta, population: 4.4 million).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used provincial administrative data encompassing patients presenting to hospital or emergency/urgent-care facilities with TIA or ischemic stroke from April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2023. We related the vascular imaging received to year, age, sex, event diagnosis, comorbidities, distance to a comprehensive stroke center, region, and stroke center type using mixed-effects logistic regressions. We similarly examined disparities in imaging for recurrent events and in receipt of carotid endarterectomy/stenting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 47 963 patients (median age, 72, interquartile range, 61-82, 47.6% female) with stroke/TIA, patients who were female, older, and experienced minor stroke/TIA (versus major stroke) had lower odds of receiving computed tomography angiography or any neurovascular imaging, as did those presenting to nonstroke centers or rural sites (eg, 35.8% rural versus 75.3% urban, adjusted odds ratio [any imaging]:0.56, 95% CI, 0.34-0.94). Odds of receiving vascular imaging increased over time, including computed tomography angiography (2016:49.1% versus 2023:79.9%, adjusted odds ratio per-year since 2015 [computed tomography angiography], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.16-1.19]). Female sex and absent neurovascular imaging carried lower odds of carotid revascularization (2.4% female versus 4.4% male, adjusted odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.52-0.63]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite increasing utilization of neurovascular imaging, patients who are female, older, rural, or with minor stroke/TIA remain less likely to receive neurovascular imaging, with expected implications for receiving carotid revascularization. Female patients are less likely to undergo carotid revascularization even after accounting for receipt of imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"eJAHA2025043715T\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.125.043715\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.125.043715","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在脑卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)中使用计算机断层血管造影、磁共振血管造影和超声成像的决定可能受到从基于位置的资源考虑到患者特征等因素的影响。我们调查了加拿大一个省(阿尔伯塔省,人口:440万)7年来血管成像利用和颈动脉重建术的差异。方法:我们使用省级行政数据,包括2016年4月1日至2023年3月31日在医院或急诊/紧急护理机构就诊的TIA或缺血性卒中患者。我们使用混合效应logistic回归将接受血管成像与年龄、性别、事件诊断、合并症、到综合卒中中心的距离、地区和卒中中心类型联系起来。我们同样检查了复发事件和接受颈动脉内膜切除术/支架置入的影像学差异。结果:在47963例卒中/TIA患者(中位年龄72岁,四分位数范围61-82岁,47.6%为女性)中,女性、年龄较大、经历过轻微卒中/TIA(与严重卒中相比)的患者接受计算机断层血管造影或任何神经血管成像的几率较低,在非卒中中心或农村地区就诊的患者也是如此(例如,农村地区为35.8%,城市为75.3%,调整后的优势比[任何成像]:0.56,95% CI, 0.34-0.94)。接受血管成像的几率随着时间的推移而增加,包括计算机断层扫描血管造影(2016:49.1% vs . 2013:79.9%,自2015年以来每年的校正优势比[计算机断层扫描血管造影]为1.18 [95% CI, 1.16-1.19])。女性和没有神经血管成像的患者颈动脉血运重建的几率较低(女性2.4%对男性4.4%,校正优势比为0.57 [95% CI, 0.52-0.63])。结论:尽管神经血管成像的应用越来越多,但女性、老年、农村或轻度卒中/TIA患者接受神经血管成像的可能性仍然较小,这对接受颈动脉血运重建术有预期意义。女性患者不太可能接受颈动脉血运重建术,即使在接受影像学检查后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study.

Background: Decisions on imaging with computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, and ultrasound in stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) may be influenced by factors ranging from location-based resource considerations to patient characteristics. We investigated disparities in vascular imaging utilization and carotid revascularization over 7 years in a Canadian province (Alberta, population: 4.4 million).

Methods: We used provincial administrative data encompassing patients presenting to hospital or emergency/urgent-care facilities with TIA or ischemic stroke from April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2023. We related the vascular imaging received to year, age, sex, event diagnosis, comorbidities, distance to a comprehensive stroke center, region, and stroke center type using mixed-effects logistic regressions. We similarly examined disparities in imaging for recurrent events and in receipt of carotid endarterectomy/stenting.

Results: Among 47 963 patients (median age, 72, interquartile range, 61-82, 47.6% female) with stroke/TIA, patients who were female, older, and experienced minor stroke/TIA (versus major stroke) had lower odds of receiving computed tomography angiography or any neurovascular imaging, as did those presenting to nonstroke centers or rural sites (eg, 35.8% rural versus 75.3% urban, adjusted odds ratio [any imaging]:0.56, 95% CI, 0.34-0.94). Odds of receiving vascular imaging increased over time, including computed tomography angiography (2016:49.1% versus 2023:79.9%, adjusted odds ratio per-year since 2015 [computed tomography angiography], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.16-1.19]). Female sex and absent neurovascular imaging carried lower odds of carotid revascularization (2.4% female versus 4.4% male, adjusted odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.52-0.63]).

Conclusions: Despite increasing utilization of neurovascular imaging, patients who are female, older, rural, or with minor stroke/TIA remain less likely to receive neurovascular imaging, with expected implications for receiving carotid revascularization. Female patients are less likely to undergo carotid revascularization even after accounting for receipt of imaging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信