弥合语言差距在医疗保健:在临床设置的神经机器翻译技术的实际实施的系统审查。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Ibrahim Serhat Karakus, Inna Strechen, Ankita Gupta, Keivan Nalaie, Christine L Chen, Leslie C Hassett, Amelia K Barwise
{"title":"弥合语言差距在医疗保健:在临床设置的神经机器翻译技术的实际实施的系统审查。","authors":"Ibrahim Serhat Karakus, Inna Strechen, Ankita Gupta, Keivan Nalaie, Christine L Chen, Leslie C Hassett, Amelia K Barwise","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Effective communication is crucial in healthcare, and for patients with a non-English language preference (NELP), professional interpreters are recognized as the gold standard in supporting bidirectional communication. However, interpreters are not always readily available, prompting the exploration of other options for translation and interpretation. The recent developments in artificial intelligence-based neural network translation tools, namely neural machine translation (NMT) may enable robust interpretation and translation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review (SR) to evaluate the literature on NMT for this purpose. We did a comprehensive search of several databases with guidance from a professional librarian. The search was limited to the year 2000 onwards and English language. Title and abstract screening and full-text review were independently conducted by two reviewers with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2867 studies were identified with 10 studies included in the final analysis. Among these, six evaluated interpretation in real or simulated clinical settings and four examined translation of discharge materials. Google Translate and ChatGPT were assessed in several studies. Accuracy differed by language, with low-resource languages performing worse.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>NMT technologies in healthcare have several advantages including broad language accessibility and potential cost savings for institutions. Despite improved accuracy of these novel tools, due to possible critical errors NMT tools are not yet ready for widespread clinical use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future studies should focus on optimizing evaluation methods as well as how best to integrate these technologies into real-time clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging language gaps in healthcare: a systematic review of the practical implementation of neural machine translation technologies in clinical settings.\",\"authors\":\"Ibrahim Serhat Karakus, Inna Strechen, Ankita Gupta, Keivan Nalaie, Christine L Chen, Leslie C Hassett, Amelia K Barwise\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocaf150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Effective communication is crucial in healthcare, and for patients with a non-English language preference (NELP), professional interpreters are recognized as the gold standard in supporting bidirectional communication. However, interpreters are not always readily available, prompting the exploration of other options for translation and interpretation. The recent developments in artificial intelligence-based neural network translation tools, namely neural machine translation (NMT) may enable robust interpretation and translation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review (SR) to evaluate the literature on NMT for this purpose. We did a comprehensive search of several databases with guidance from a professional librarian. The search was limited to the year 2000 onwards and English language. Title and abstract screening and full-text review were independently conducted by two reviewers with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2867 studies were identified with 10 studies included in the final analysis. Among these, six evaluated interpretation in real or simulated clinical settings and four examined translation of discharge materials. Google Translate and ChatGPT were assessed in several studies. Accuracy differed by language, with low-resource languages performing worse.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>NMT technologies in healthcare have several advantages including broad language accessibility and potential cost savings for institutions. Despite improved accuracy of these novel tools, due to possible critical errors NMT tools are not yet ready for widespread clinical use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future studies should focus on optimizing evaluation methods as well as how best to integrate these technologies into real-time clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf150\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:有效的沟通在医疗保健中至关重要,对于非英语语言偏好(NELP)的患者,专业口译员被认为是支持双向沟通的黄金标准。然而,口译员并不总是随时可用,这促使人们探索笔译和口译的其他选择。基于人工智能的神经网络翻译工具,即神经机器翻译(NMT)的最新发展可以实现鲁棒解释和翻译。材料和方法:我们进行了一项系统综述(SR)来评估关于NMT的文献。在一位专业图书管理员的指导下,我们对几个数据库进行了全面的搜索。搜索仅限于2000年以后的英语语言。题目、摘要筛选和全文评审由两名审稿人独立进行,冲突由第三名审稿人解决。结果:共纳入2867项研究,最终纳入10项研究。其中,六项评估了真实或模拟临床环境中的解释,四项检查了出院材料的翻译。谷歌翻译和ChatGPT在几项研究中进行了评估。准确率因语言而异,资源匮乏的语言表现更差。讨论:医疗保健中的NMT技术有几个优势,包括广泛的语言可访问性和机构的潜在成本节约。尽管这些新工具的准确性有所提高,但由于可能存在严重错误,NMT工具尚未准备好广泛应用于临床。结论:未来的研究应侧重于优化评估方法以及如何最好地将这些技术整合到实时临床环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging language gaps in healthcare: a systematic review of the practical implementation of neural machine translation technologies in clinical settings.

Objectives: Effective communication is crucial in healthcare, and for patients with a non-English language preference (NELP), professional interpreters are recognized as the gold standard in supporting bidirectional communication. However, interpreters are not always readily available, prompting the exploration of other options for translation and interpretation. The recent developments in artificial intelligence-based neural network translation tools, namely neural machine translation (NMT) may enable robust interpretation and translation.

Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic review (SR) to evaluate the literature on NMT for this purpose. We did a comprehensive search of several databases with guidance from a professional librarian. The search was limited to the year 2000 onwards and English language. Title and abstract screening and full-text review were independently conducted by two reviewers with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer.

Results: 2867 studies were identified with 10 studies included in the final analysis. Among these, six evaluated interpretation in real or simulated clinical settings and four examined translation of discharge materials. Google Translate and ChatGPT were assessed in several studies. Accuracy differed by language, with low-resource languages performing worse.

Discussion: NMT technologies in healthcare have several advantages including broad language accessibility and potential cost savings for institutions. Despite improved accuracy of these novel tools, due to possible critical errors NMT tools are not yet ready for widespread clinical use.

Conclusion: Future studies should focus on optimizing evaluation methods as well as how best to integrate these technologies into real-time clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信