肌肉能量技术和关节手法在骶髂关节疼痛患者功能改善和疼痛减轻中的有效性:一个批判性评估的主题。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Zoe Laferriere, Nicole Mondelli, Matthew J Rivera
{"title":"肌肉能量技术和关节手法在骶髂关节疼痛患者功能改善和疼痛减轻中的有效性:一个批判性评估的主题。","authors":"Zoe Laferriere, Nicole Mondelli, Matthew J Rivera","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical scenario: </strong>Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is a type of low back pain, affecting roughly 15% to 30% of patient cases. Pain management is essential for improving function and quality of life in these patients. However, due to the complexity of the anatomy and the innervations surrounding the SIJ, there is limited consensus on the most effective treatment for SIJ pain, resulting in variable approaches to pain management. Common interventions for SIJ pain include muscle energy techniques (MET) and joint manipulations, both are known for their ability to improve function and reduce pain.</p><p><strong>Clinical question: </strong>In adults with SIJ pain, are joint manipulations or METs more effective in improving function AND reducing pain?</p><p><strong>Summary of key findings: </strong>Both MET and joint manipulations are effective in treating SIJ pain. The current literature revealed a lack of evidence regarding the sole utilization of MET or manipulation in being more effective in improving function and reducing pain in adults with SIJ pain.</p><p><strong>Clinical bottom line: </strong>The evidence indicates that both MET and joint manipulations effectively reduce pain and improve function in patients with SIJ pain. However, the literature does not consistently favor one method over the other. Using the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence 2 studies are level 2 and on study is level 3, suggesting that both treatments can be beneficial.</p><p><strong>Strength of recommendation: </strong>According to the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy, a grade of C is recommended, indicating that there is fair evidence that is inconclusive but suggests that both treatments can be beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Techniques and Joint Manipulations in Functional Improvements and Pain Reduction in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Critically Appraised Topic.\",\"authors\":\"Zoe Laferriere, Nicole Mondelli, Matthew J Rivera\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jsr.2024-0323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Clinical scenario: </strong>Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is a type of low back pain, affecting roughly 15% to 30% of patient cases. Pain management is essential for improving function and quality of life in these patients. However, due to the complexity of the anatomy and the innervations surrounding the SIJ, there is limited consensus on the most effective treatment for SIJ pain, resulting in variable approaches to pain management. Common interventions for SIJ pain include muscle energy techniques (MET) and joint manipulations, both are known for their ability to improve function and reduce pain.</p><p><strong>Clinical question: </strong>In adults with SIJ pain, are joint manipulations or METs more effective in improving function AND reducing pain?</p><p><strong>Summary of key findings: </strong>Both MET and joint manipulations are effective in treating SIJ pain. The current literature revealed a lack of evidence regarding the sole utilization of MET or manipulation in being more effective in improving function and reducing pain in adults with SIJ pain.</p><p><strong>Clinical bottom line: </strong>The evidence indicates that both MET and joint manipulations effectively reduce pain and improve function in patients with SIJ pain. However, the literature does not consistently favor one method over the other. Using the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence 2 studies are level 2 and on study is level 3, suggesting that both treatments can be beneficial.</p><p><strong>Strength of recommendation: </strong>According to the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy, a grade of C is recommended, indicating that there is fair evidence that is inconclusive but suggests that both treatments can be beneficial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0323\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床情况:骶髂关节(SIJ)疼痛是腰痛的一种,约占患者病例的15%至30%。疼痛管理对于改善这些患者的功能和生活质量至关重要。然而,由于SIJ周围的解剖结构和神经支配的复杂性,对于SIJ疼痛的最有效治疗方法的共识有限,导致疼痛管理的方法多种多样。SIJ疼痛的常见干预措施包括肌肉能量技术(MET)和关节操作,两者都以其改善功能和减轻疼痛的能力而闻名。临床问题:在患有SIJ疼痛的成人中,关节手法或METs在改善功能和减轻疼痛方面更有效吗?主要发现总结:MET和关节手法均可有效治疗SIJ疼痛。目前的文献显示,缺乏证据表明单纯使用MET或手法更有效地改善成人SIJ疼痛的功能和减轻疼痛。临床底线:有证据表明MET和关节手法都能有效减轻SIJ疼痛患者的疼痛和改善功能。然而,文献并没有一致地支持一种方法。根据牛津循证医学中心2011年的证据水平,2级研究是2级,1级研究是3级,这表明两种治疗方法都是有益的。推荐强度:根据推荐强度分类法(Strength of recommendation Taxonomy),建议给出C级,这表明有充分的证据表明两种治疗方法都是有益的,但不是决定性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Techniques and Joint Manipulations in Functional Improvements and Pain Reduction in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Critically Appraised Topic.

Clinical scenario: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is a type of low back pain, affecting roughly 15% to 30% of patient cases. Pain management is essential for improving function and quality of life in these patients. However, due to the complexity of the anatomy and the innervations surrounding the SIJ, there is limited consensus on the most effective treatment for SIJ pain, resulting in variable approaches to pain management. Common interventions for SIJ pain include muscle energy techniques (MET) and joint manipulations, both are known for their ability to improve function and reduce pain.

Clinical question: In adults with SIJ pain, are joint manipulations or METs more effective in improving function AND reducing pain?

Summary of key findings: Both MET and joint manipulations are effective in treating SIJ pain. The current literature revealed a lack of evidence regarding the sole utilization of MET or manipulation in being more effective in improving function and reducing pain in adults with SIJ pain.

Clinical bottom line: The evidence indicates that both MET and joint manipulations effectively reduce pain and improve function in patients with SIJ pain. However, the literature does not consistently favor one method over the other. Using the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence 2 studies are level 2 and on study is level 3, suggesting that both treatments can be beneficial.

Strength of recommendation: According to the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy, a grade of C is recommended, indicating that there is fair evidence that is inconclusive but suggests that both treatments can be beneficial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信