成人1型糖尿病患者的压力与健康相关生活质量:感知支持和治疗依从性的中介作用

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Rafael Salas-Muriel, Francisco Javier De Santiago-Herrero, María Montfragüe García-Mateos, María Del Sol Fortea Sevilla, Cristina Jenaro, Juan-José Igartua
{"title":"成人1型糖尿病患者的压力与健康相关生活质量:感知支持和治疗依从性的中介作用","authors":"Rafael Salas-Muriel, Francisco Javier De Santiago-Herrero, María Montfragüe García-Mateos, María Del Sol Fortea Sevilla, Cristina Jenaro, Juan-José Igartua","doi":"10.1111/jocn.70114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the associations among diabetes-related stress, treatment adherence, perceived social support, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1), and to explore the mediating roles of support and adherence in this relationship.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study using self-report standardised measures and mediation analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 772 Spanish adults with DM1 completed validated instruments measuring diabetes-related distress, perceived social support, treatment adherence, and HRQoL. Hierarchical multiple regression and serial mediation analysis (PROCESS Model 6, 10,000 bootstraps) were conducted, controlling for age, sex, and time since diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Not applicable (primary data collection, not a review).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diabetes-related stress was the strongest predictor of lower HRQoL. Perceived social support and treatment adherence also contributed significantly. Mediation analyses indicated that the impact of stress on HRQoL was partially mediated by perceived social support and, in sequence, by treatment adherence. The indirect path through social support alone and the sequential path involving both mediators were significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stress and social support are critical in understanding and improving HRQoL in adults with DM1. Treatment adherence appears to be influenced by perceived support, highlighting an indirect mechanism linking stress to quality of life.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>Healthcare professionals should integrate psychosocial assessments and interventions into routine diabetes care. Targeting stress reduction and enhancing social support may improve adherence and overall well-being in adults with DM1.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>What problem did the study address? The study addressed the need to understand how psychosocial factors-specifically stress, perceived social support, and treatment adherence-contribute to HRQoL in adults with DM1. While prior research often focused on paediatric or clinical populations and rarely explored mediation models, this study sought to fill those gaps with data from a large community sample of adults. What were the main findings? The main findings indicate that diabetes-related stress is the most significant predictor of reduced HRQoL. This relationship is partially mediated by perceived social support and, sequentially, by treatment adherence. While stress directly affects HRQoL, its negative impact is also channelled through diminished social support and decreased adherence. The indirect effect through treatment adherence alone was not significant. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The research has implications for adults living with DM1, particularly those in community settings outside of clinical supervision. It informs healthcare providers, diabetes educators, and policymakers on the importance of addressing emotional distress and strengthening support networks to improve both treatment adherence and overall quality of life.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study adhered to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines for cross-sectional studies. All methods and results are reported in alignment with EQUATOR Network recommendations for transparent and rigorous research reporting.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>The study was conducted in collaboration with the Spanish Diabetes Federation (FEDE), which supported participant recruitment and dissemination through its affiliated associations. Patient input was incorporated throughout the study. A person with lived experience of type 1 diabetes contributed to the conceptual development of the research questions and the interpretation of findings. Their perspective helped ensure that the study design, choice of measures, and implications were relevant and meaningful to people living with the condition. This involvement supported a patient-centred approach to both the research and the manuscript preparation. Patients' participation as voluntary contributors was essential to the data collection process.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: The Mediating Role of Perceived Support and Treatment Adherence.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Salas-Muriel, Francisco Javier De Santiago-Herrero, María Montfragüe García-Mateos, María Del Sol Fortea Sevilla, Cristina Jenaro, Juan-José Igartua\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.70114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the associations among diabetes-related stress, treatment adherence, perceived social support, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1), and to explore the mediating roles of support and adherence in this relationship.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study using self-report standardised measures and mediation analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 772 Spanish adults with DM1 completed validated instruments measuring diabetes-related distress, perceived social support, treatment adherence, and HRQoL. Hierarchical multiple regression and serial mediation analysis (PROCESS Model 6, 10,000 bootstraps) were conducted, controlling for age, sex, and time since diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Not applicable (primary data collection, not a review).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diabetes-related stress was the strongest predictor of lower HRQoL. Perceived social support and treatment adherence also contributed significantly. Mediation analyses indicated that the impact of stress on HRQoL was partially mediated by perceived social support and, in sequence, by treatment adherence. The indirect path through social support alone and the sequential path involving both mediators were significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stress and social support are critical in understanding and improving HRQoL in adults with DM1. Treatment adherence appears to be influenced by perceived support, highlighting an indirect mechanism linking stress to quality of life.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>Healthcare professionals should integrate psychosocial assessments and interventions into routine diabetes care. Targeting stress reduction and enhancing social support may improve adherence and overall well-being in adults with DM1.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>What problem did the study address? The study addressed the need to understand how psychosocial factors-specifically stress, perceived social support, and treatment adherence-contribute to HRQoL in adults with DM1. While prior research often focused on paediatric or clinical populations and rarely explored mediation models, this study sought to fill those gaps with data from a large community sample of adults. What were the main findings? The main findings indicate that diabetes-related stress is the most significant predictor of reduced HRQoL. This relationship is partially mediated by perceived social support and, sequentially, by treatment adherence. While stress directly affects HRQoL, its negative impact is also channelled through diminished social support and decreased adherence. The indirect effect through treatment adherence alone was not significant. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The research has implications for adults living with DM1, particularly those in community settings outside of clinical supervision. It informs healthcare providers, diabetes educators, and policymakers on the importance of addressing emotional distress and strengthening support networks to improve both treatment adherence and overall quality of life.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study adhered to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines for cross-sectional studies. All methods and results are reported in alignment with EQUATOR Network recommendations for transparent and rigorous research reporting.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>The study was conducted in collaboration with the Spanish Diabetes Federation (FEDE), which supported participant recruitment and dissemination through its affiliated associations. Patient input was incorporated throughout the study. A person with lived experience of type 1 diabetes contributed to the conceptual development of the research questions and the interpretation of findings. Their perspective helped ensure that the study design, choice of measures, and implications were relevant and meaningful to people living with the condition. This involvement supported a patient-centred approach to both the research and the manuscript preparation. Patients' participation as voluntary contributors was essential to the data collection process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70114\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨成人1型糖尿病(DM1)患者糖尿病相关应激、治疗依从性、感知社会支持和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)之间的关系,并探讨支持和依从性在这种关系中的中介作用。设计:采用自我报告标准化测量和中介分析的横断面观察性研究。方法:共有772名患有DM1的西班牙成年人完成了有效的测量糖尿病相关痛苦、感知社会支持、治疗依从性和HRQoL的仪器。在控制年龄、性别和诊断后时间的条件下,进行了层次多元回归和序列中介分析(PROCESS Model 6, 10,000个bootstrap)。数据来源:不适用(主要数据收集,而不是回顾)。结果:糖尿病相关应激是较低HRQoL的最强预测因子。感知社会支持和治疗依从性也有显著影响。中介分析表明,应激对HRQoL的影响部分由感知到的社会支持介导,依次由治疗依从性介导。仅通过社会支持的间接路径和涉及两种中介的顺序路径显著。结论:应激和社会支持是理解和改善成人DM1患者HRQoL的关键因素。治疗依从性似乎受到感知支持的影响,强调了将压力与生活质量联系起来的间接机制。对专业和/或患者护理的启示:医疗保健专业人员应将心理社会评估和干预纳入常规糖尿病护理。以减压和增强社会支持为目标,可能会改善成年DM1患者的依从性和整体幸福感。影响:研究解决了什么问题?该研究旨在了解心理社会因素——特别是压力、感知到的社会支持和治疗依从性——如何影响成年DM1患者的HRQoL。虽然之前的研究通常集中在儿科或临床人群,很少探索中介模型,但本研究试图用来自大型社区成人样本的数据来填补这些空白。主要发现是什么?主要研究结果表明,糖尿病相关应激是HRQoL降低的最显著预测因子。这种关系部分由感知到的社会支持介导,继而由治疗依从性介导。虽然压力直接影响HRQoL,但其负面影响也通过减少社会支持和降低依从性来传达。治疗依从性的间接影响不显著。这项研究将对谁和在哪里产生影响?这项研究对患有DM1的成年人有启示,特别是那些在临床监督之外的社区环境中的成年人。它告知医疗保健提供者、糖尿病教育工作者和政策制定者解决情绪困扰和加强支持网络的重要性,以提高治疗依从性和整体生活质量。报告方法:本研究遵循STROBE(加强流行病学观察性研究报告)横断面研究指南。所有方法和结果的报告都符合赤道网络关于透明和严格的研究报告的建议。患者或公众贡献:该研究是与西班牙糖尿病联合会(FEDE)合作进行的,该联合会通过其附属协会支持参与者招募和传播。在整个研究过程中纳入了患者的意见。一位有1型糖尿病生活经验的人对研究问题的概念发展和研究结果的解释做出了贡献。他们的观点有助于确保研究设计、测量方法的选择和影响对患有这种疾病的人是相关的和有意义的。这种参与支持了以患者为中心的研究和手稿准备方法。患者作为自愿贡献者的参与对数据收集过程至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stress and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: The Mediating Role of Perceived Support and Treatment Adherence.

Aims: To examine the associations among diabetes-related stress, treatment adherence, perceived social support, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1), and to explore the mediating roles of support and adherence in this relationship.

Design: A cross-sectional observational study using self-report standardised measures and mediation analysis.

Methods: A total of 772 Spanish adults with DM1 completed validated instruments measuring diabetes-related distress, perceived social support, treatment adherence, and HRQoL. Hierarchical multiple regression and serial mediation analysis (PROCESS Model 6, 10,000 bootstraps) were conducted, controlling for age, sex, and time since diagnosis.

Data sources: Not applicable (primary data collection, not a review).

Results: Diabetes-related stress was the strongest predictor of lower HRQoL. Perceived social support and treatment adherence also contributed significantly. Mediation analyses indicated that the impact of stress on HRQoL was partially mediated by perceived social support and, in sequence, by treatment adherence. The indirect path through social support alone and the sequential path involving both mediators were significant.

Conclusion: Stress and social support are critical in understanding and improving HRQoL in adults with DM1. Treatment adherence appears to be influenced by perceived support, highlighting an indirect mechanism linking stress to quality of life.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care: Healthcare professionals should integrate psychosocial assessments and interventions into routine diabetes care. Targeting stress reduction and enhancing social support may improve adherence and overall well-being in adults with DM1.

Impact: What problem did the study address? The study addressed the need to understand how psychosocial factors-specifically stress, perceived social support, and treatment adherence-contribute to HRQoL in adults with DM1. While prior research often focused on paediatric or clinical populations and rarely explored mediation models, this study sought to fill those gaps with data from a large community sample of adults. What were the main findings? The main findings indicate that diabetes-related stress is the most significant predictor of reduced HRQoL. This relationship is partially mediated by perceived social support and, sequentially, by treatment adherence. While stress directly affects HRQoL, its negative impact is also channelled through diminished social support and decreased adherence. The indirect effect through treatment adherence alone was not significant. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The research has implications for adults living with DM1, particularly those in community settings outside of clinical supervision. It informs healthcare providers, diabetes educators, and policymakers on the importance of addressing emotional distress and strengthening support networks to improve both treatment adherence and overall quality of life.

Reporting method: This study adhered to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines for cross-sectional studies. All methods and results are reported in alignment with EQUATOR Network recommendations for transparent and rigorous research reporting.

Patient or public contribution: The study was conducted in collaboration with the Spanish Diabetes Federation (FEDE), which supported participant recruitment and dissemination through its affiliated associations. Patient input was incorporated throughout the study. A person with lived experience of type 1 diabetes contributed to the conceptual development of the research questions and the interpretation of findings. Their perspective helped ensure that the study design, choice of measures, and implications were relevant and meaningful to people living with the condition. This involvement supported a patient-centred approach to both the research and the manuscript preparation. Patients' participation as voluntary contributors was essential to the data collection process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信