Tomer Bashi, Adi Kidron, Ziv Savin, Amihay Nevo, Sophie Barnes, Ofer Yossepowitch, Roy Mano, Snir Dekalo
{"title":"男性留置导尿的磁共振成像和靶向活检结果的诊断性能:一项倾向评分匹配的研究。","authors":"Tomer Bashi, Adi Kidron, Ziv Savin, Amihay Nevo, Sophie Barnes, Ofer Yossepowitch, Roy Mano, Snir Dekalo","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We sought to evaluate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) findings and biopsy results in men with an indwelling catheter undergoing prostate cancer screening. mpMRI is central to the evaluation of prostate cancer. Little is known as to the effect of an indwelling urinary catheter on prostate mpMRI findings and the results of subsequent biopsies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 5820 mpMRI exams performed from 2017-2023. Forty-eight patients underwent mpMRI with indwelling urinary catheter. Using propensity score matching, patients were matched 1:1 for age, pre-biopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and prostate volume. Clinical characteristics, mpMRI findings, and targeted biopsy results were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, clinical characteristics of the study groups did not differ significantly. Prostate Imaging-Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) distribution did not show a significant difference (p=0.51); PI-RADS ≥3 lesions were identified in 20/48 patients with indwelling catheters (42%) and in 18/50 patients without catheters (36%). Among patients with a PI-RADS score ≥3, clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC) was identified in 5/20 patients carrying catheters and 6/18 patients without catheters (p=0.152). A higher rate of any cancer was identified in patients without a catheter (67% vs. 35%, p=0.049). PSA >9.79 ng/ml predicted the finding of CSPC in patients carrying urinary catheters with PI-RADS ≥3 lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest no significant difference in mpMRI findings and CSPC rates for patients with and without indwelling urinary catheters. Patients carrying urinary catheters suspected to harbor CSPC based on an elevated PSA level should undergo further evaluation, including mpMRI and biopsies when necessary before benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy results in men with indwelling urinary catheters: A propensity score matched study.\",\"authors\":\"Tomer Bashi, Adi Kidron, Ziv Savin, Amihay Nevo, Sophie Barnes, Ofer Yossepowitch, Roy Mano, Snir Dekalo\",\"doi\":\"10.5489/cuaj.9194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We sought to evaluate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) findings and biopsy results in men with an indwelling catheter undergoing prostate cancer screening. mpMRI is central to the evaluation of prostate cancer. Little is known as to the effect of an indwelling urinary catheter on prostate mpMRI findings and the results of subsequent biopsies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 5820 mpMRI exams performed from 2017-2023. Forty-eight patients underwent mpMRI with indwelling urinary catheter. Using propensity score matching, patients were matched 1:1 for age, pre-biopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and prostate volume. Clinical characteristics, mpMRI findings, and targeted biopsy results were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, clinical characteristics of the study groups did not differ significantly. Prostate Imaging-Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) distribution did not show a significant difference (p=0.51); PI-RADS ≥3 lesions were identified in 20/48 patients with indwelling catheters (42%) and in 18/50 patients without catheters (36%). Among patients with a PI-RADS score ≥3, clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC) was identified in 5/20 patients carrying catheters and 6/18 patients without catheters (p=0.152). A higher rate of any cancer was identified in patients without a catheter (67% vs. 35%, p=0.049). PSA >9.79 ng/ml predicted the finding of CSPC in patients carrying urinary catheters with PI-RADS ≥3 lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest no significant difference in mpMRI findings and CSPC rates for patients with and without indwelling urinary catheters. Patients carrying urinary catheters suspected to harbor CSPC based on an elevated PSA level should undergo further evaluation, including mpMRI and biopsies when necessary before benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9194\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy results in men with indwelling urinary catheters: A propensity score matched study.
Introduction: We sought to evaluate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) findings and biopsy results in men with an indwelling catheter undergoing prostate cancer screening. mpMRI is central to the evaluation of prostate cancer. Little is known as to the effect of an indwelling urinary catheter on prostate mpMRI findings and the results of subsequent biopsies.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 5820 mpMRI exams performed from 2017-2023. Forty-eight patients underwent mpMRI with indwelling urinary catheter. Using propensity score matching, patients were matched 1:1 for age, pre-biopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and prostate volume. Clinical characteristics, mpMRI findings, and targeted biopsy results were compared between the groups.
Results: After propensity score matching, clinical characteristics of the study groups did not differ significantly. Prostate Imaging-Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) distribution did not show a significant difference (p=0.51); PI-RADS ≥3 lesions were identified in 20/48 patients with indwelling catheters (42%) and in 18/50 patients without catheters (36%). Among patients with a PI-RADS score ≥3, clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC) was identified in 5/20 patients carrying catheters and 6/18 patients without catheters (p=0.152). A higher rate of any cancer was identified in patients without a catheter (67% vs. 35%, p=0.049). PSA >9.79 ng/ml predicted the finding of CSPC in patients carrying urinary catheters with PI-RADS ≥3 lesions.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest no significant difference in mpMRI findings and CSPC rates for patients with and without indwelling urinary catheters. Patients carrying urinary catheters suspected to harbor CSPC based on an elevated PSA level should undergo further evaluation, including mpMRI and biopsies when necessary before benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment.
期刊介绍:
CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.