某教学妇产医院疑似或确诊COVID-19医护人员的应对策略

Q4 Medicine
Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho Pub Date : 2025-07-13 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.47626/1679-4435-2025-1386
Romanniny Hévillyn Silva Costa Almino, Juliana Dantas de Araújo Santos Camargo, Paula Laís Padilha Martinho, Cybelle Dutra da Silva, Rebecca Stefany da Costa Santos, Janice França de Queiroz, Sávio Ferreira Camargo, Richardson Augusto Rosendo da Silva
{"title":"某教学妇产医院疑似或确诊COVID-19医护人员的应对策略","authors":"Romanniny Hévillyn Silva Costa Almino, Juliana Dantas de Araújo Santos Camargo, Paula Laís Padilha Martinho, Cybelle Dutra da Silva, Rebecca Stefany da Costa Santos, Janice França de Queiroz, Sávio Ferreira Camargo, Richardson Augusto Rosendo da Silva","doi":"10.47626/1679-4435-2025-1386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the physical and mental health of health professionals.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the coping strategies employed by health professionals in response to the suspicion or confirmation of infection with the novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) according to their sociodemographic, clinical-epidemiological, and occupational profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2020 to January 2021 at a teaching maternity hospital located in the Northeast region of Brazil and included 188 health professionals. The Coping Strategies Inventory was used to assess confrontation, problem-solving, distancing, self-care, acceptance of responsibility, positive reappraisal, escape-avoidance, and social support. Cronbach's alpha, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and post-hoc tests were applied (α = 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Social support (1.28 ± 0.70) and problem-solving (1.25 ± 0.68) were the most frequently adopted coping strategies. Women scored significantly higher than men in social support (1.33 vs. 0.83; p = 0.046), escape-avoidance (1.00 vs. 0.50; p = 0.036), and positive reappraisal (1.22 vs. 0.95; p = 0.009). Professionals who reported adopting preventive measures in the workplace had higher scores in social support (p = 0.016) and positive reappraisal (p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social support and problem-solving were the main coping strategies used in the face of suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Understanding the needs and experiences of health professionals during crises is essential for developing targeted interventions that respect the specific characteristics of each group.</p>","PeriodicalId":38694,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho","volume":"23 2","pages":"e20251386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coping strategies of health professionals suspected or confirmed to have COVID-19 in a teaching maternity hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Romanniny Hévillyn Silva Costa Almino, Juliana Dantas de Araújo Santos Camargo, Paula Laís Padilha Martinho, Cybelle Dutra da Silva, Rebecca Stefany da Costa Santos, Janice França de Queiroz, Sávio Ferreira Camargo, Richardson Augusto Rosendo da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.47626/1679-4435-2025-1386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the physical and mental health of health professionals.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the coping strategies employed by health professionals in response to the suspicion or confirmation of infection with the novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) according to their sociodemographic, clinical-epidemiological, and occupational profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2020 to January 2021 at a teaching maternity hospital located in the Northeast region of Brazil and included 188 health professionals. The Coping Strategies Inventory was used to assess confrontation, problem-solving, distancing, self-care, acceptance of responsibility, positive reappraisal, escape-avoidance, and social support. Cronbach's alpha, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and post-hoc tests were applied (α = 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Social support (1.28 ± 0.70) and problem-solving (1.25 ± 0.68) were the most frequently adopted coping strategies. Women scored significantly higher than men in social support (1.33 vs. 0.83; p = 0.046), escape-avoidance (1.00 vs. 0.50; p = 0.036), and positive reappraisal (1.22 vs. 0.95; p = 0.009). Professionals who reported adopting preventive measures in the workplace had higher scores in social support (p = 0.016) and positive reappraisal (p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social support and problem-solving were the main coping strategies used in the face of suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Understanding the needs and experiences of health professionals during crises is essential for developing targeted interventions that respect the specific characteristics of each group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"e20251386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443400/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2025-1386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2025-1386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行影响了卫生专业人员的身心健康。目的:根据卫生专业人员的社会人口学、临床流行病学和职业特征,评估其在疑似或确诊新型冠状病毒(严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型)感染时的应对策略。方法:本横断面研究于2020年3月至2021年1月在巴西东北部地区的一家教学妇产医院进行,包括188名卫生专业人员。应对策略量表用于评估对抗、解决问题、疏远、自我照顾、责任接受、积极重新评价、逃避-回避和社会支持。采用Cronbach’s alpha、Mann-Whitney、Kruskal-Wallis和事后检验(α = 5%)。结果:社会支持(1.28±0.70)和解决问题(1.25±0.68)是最常见的应对策略。女性在社会支持(1.33比0.83,p = 0.046)、逃避-回避(1.00比0.50,p = 0.036)和积极重新评价(1.22比0.95,p = 0.009)方面得分显著高于男性。在工作场所采取预防措施的专业人员在社会支持(p = 0.016)和积极的重新评价(p = 0.016)方面得分较高。结论:社会支持和解决问题是应对新型冠状病毒肺炎的主要策略。了解危机期间卫生专业人员的需求和经验,对于制定尊重每个群体具体特征的有针对性的干预措施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coping strategies of health professionals suspected or confirmed to have COVID-19 in a teaching maternity hospital.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the physical and mental health of health professionals.

Objectives: To assess the coping strategies employed by health professionals in response to the suspicion or confirmation of infection with the novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) according to their sociodemographic, clinical-epidemiological, and occupational profiles.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2020 to January 2021 at a teaching maternity hospital located in the Northeast region of Brazil and included 188 health professionals. The Coping Strategies Inventory was used to assess confrontation, problem-solving, distancing, self-care, acceptance of responsibility, positive reappraisal, escape-avoidance, and social support. Cronbach's alpha, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and post-hoc tests were applied (α = 5%).

Results: Social support (1.28 ± 0.70) and problem-solving (1.25 ± 0.68) were the most frequently adopted coping strategies. Women scored significantly higher than men in social support (1.33 vs. 0.83; p = 0.046), escape-avoidance (1.00 vs. 0.50; p = 0.036), and positive reappraisal (1.22 vs. 0.95; p = 0.009). Professionals who reported adopting preventive measures in the workplace had higher scores in social support (p = 0.016) and positive reappraisal (p = 0.016).

Conclusions: Social support and problem-solving were the main coping strategies used in the face of suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Understanding the needs and experiences of health professionals during crises is essential for developing targeted interventions that respect the specific characteristics of each group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho
Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信