2023年澳大利亚农村住宅老年护理机构爆发侵袭性A群链球菌的管理

IF 1.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Pub Date : 2025-09-01 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.5365/wpsar.2025.16.3.1176
Hannah Woodall, Teresa McGorm, Rikki Graham, Amy Jennison, Priya Janagaraj
{"title":"2023年澳大利亚农村住宅老年护理机构爆发侵袭性A群链球菌的管理","authors":"Hannah Woodall, Teresa McGorm, Rikki Graham, Amy Jennison, Priya Janagaraj","doi":"10.5365/wpsar.2025.16.3.1176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To outline the management of an outbreak of invasive group A Streptococcus (iGAS) in a residential aged-care facility in rural Queensland, Australia, comparing outbreak management with the newly released Australian Series of National Guidelines (SoNG) for this disease and exploring unique aspects of rural iGAS outbreak management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An outbreak of iGAS was identified in a rural Queensland residential facility, where two cases occurred within 24 hours. A confirmed case was defined as any individual linked to the facility who had laboratory evidence of group A Streptococcus (GAS) in a sterile site. Whole genome sequencing was performed on all confirmed cases. The public health management of this outbreak was conducted according to the Queensland Communicable Disease Control guidelines and was compared with the new SoNG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A phylogenetic tree confirmed that the two samples clustered closely together with a single allele difference. Chemoprophylaxis was offered to all residents and staff in the affected part of the facility; 95% (42/44) of residents consented to chemoprophylaxis. Increased surveillance for GAS and increased facility cleaning were recommended by the public health unit. No additional cases were identified after 30 days of surveillance. Management of the outbreak largely aligned with the SoNG except for post-outbreak surveillance, which would have been extended under the new guidelines.<b>Discussion:</b> This paper highlights factors unique to managing iGAS outbreaks in rural areas. Rural workforce factors and access to pathology services impact rural outbreak management, and thus involving local services and considering the local context are vital. The use of chemoprophylaxis continues to be recommended by the SoNG, and in this case was considered to be an important adjunct to other management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":31512,"journal":{"name":"Western Pacific Surveillance and Response","volume":"16 3","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of an outbreak of invasive group A <i>Streptococcus</i> in a rural Australian residential aged-care facility, 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Woodall, Teresa McGorm, Rikki Graham, Amy Jennison, Priya Janagaraj\",\"doi\":\"10.5365/wpsar.2025.16.3.1176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To outline the management of an outbreak of invasive group A Streptococcus (iGAS) in a residential aged-care facility in rural Queensland, Australia, comparing outbreak management with the newly released Australian Series of National Guidelines (SoNG) for this disease and exploring unique aspects of rural iGAS outbreak management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An outbreak of iGAS was identified in a rural Queensland residential facility, where two cases occurred within 24 hours. A confirmed case was defined as any individual linked to the facility who had laboratory evidence of group A Streptococcus (GAS) in a sterile site. Whole genome sequencing was performed on all confirmed cases. The public health management of this outbreak was conducted according to the Queensland Communicable Disease Control guidelines and was compared with the new SoNG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A phylogenetic tree confirmed that the two samples clustered closely together with a single allele difference. Chemoprophylaxis was offered to all residents and staff in the affected part of the facility; 95% (42/44) of residents consented to chemoprophylaxis. Increased surveillance for GAS and increased facility cleaning were recommended by the public health unit. No additional cases were identified after 30 days of surveillance. Management of the outbreak largely aligned with the SoNG except for post-outbreak surveillance, which would have been extended under the new guidelines.<b>Discussion:</b> This paper highlights factors unique to managing iGAS outbreaks in rural areas. Rural workforce factors and access to pathology services impact rural outbreak management, and thus involving local services and considering the local context are vital. The use of chemoprophylaxis continues to be recommended by the SoNG, and in this case was considered to be an important adjunct to other management strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":31512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Pacific Surveillance and Response\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441184/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Pacific Surveillance and Response\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5365/wpsar.2025.16.3.1176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Pacific Surveillance and Response","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5365/wpsar.2025.16.3.1176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:概述澳大利亚昆士兰州农村住宅养老机构侵袭性A群链球菌(iGAS)暴发的管理,比较暴发管理与新发布的澳大利亚系列国家指南(SoNG),并探讨农村iGAS暴发管理的独特之处。方法:在昆士兰州的一个农村住宅设施中发现了iGAS的暴发,在24小时内发生了两例病例。确诊病例定义为与该设施有关的任何个人,并在无菌场所有A群链球菌(GAS)的实验室证据。对所有确诊病例进行全基因组测序。本次疫情的公共卫生管理是根据《昆士兰州传染病控制指南》进行的,并与新版《传染病控制指南》进行了比较。结果:系统发育树证实两个样本紧密聚集在一起,具有单个等位基因差异。向该设施受影响部分的所有居民和工作人员提供化学预防;95%(42/44)的居民同意化学预防。公共卫生单位建议加强对毒气的监测和加强设施清洁。经过30天的监测,没有发现新的病例。除了疫情后监测外,疫情的管理基本上与《战略指南》保持一致,根据新的指导方针,疫情后监测将得到延长。讨论:本文强调了管理农村地区iGAS暴发的独特因素。农村劳动力因素和获得病理服务影响农村疫情管理,因此让当地服务机构参与进来并考虑当地情况至关重要。化学预防的使用继续被推荐,在这种情况下,被认为是其他管理策略的重要辅助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Management of an outbreak of invasive group A <i>Streptococcus</i> in a rural Australian residential aged-care facility, 2023.

Management of an outbreak of invasive group A Streptococcus in a rural Australian residential aged-care facility, 2023.

Objective: To outline the management of an outbreak of invasive group A Streptococcus (iGAS) in a residential aged-care facility in rural Queensland, Australia, comparing outbreak management with the newly released Australian Series of National Guidelines (SoNG) for this disease and exploring unique aspects of rural iGAS outbreak management.

Methods: An outbreak of iGAS was identified in a rural Queensland residential facility, where two cases occurred within 24 hours. A confirmed case was defined as any individual linked to the facility who had laboratory evidence of group A Streptococcus (GAS) in a sterile site. Whole genome sequencing was performed on all confirmed cases. The public health management of this outbreak was conducted according to the Queensland Communicable Disease Control guidelines and was compared with the new SoNG.

Results: A phylogenetic tree confirmed that the two samples clustered closely together with a single allele difference. Chemoprophylaxis was offered to all residents and staff in the affected part of the facility; 95% (42/44) of residents consented to chemoprophylaxis. Increased surveillance for GAS and increased facility cleaning were recommended by the public health unit. No additional cases were identified after 30 days of surveillance. Management of the outbreak largely aligned with the SoNG except for post-outbreak surveillance, which would have been extended under the new guidelines.Discussion: This paper highlights factors unique to managing iGAS outbreaks in rural areas. Rural workforce factors and access to pathology services impact rural outbreak management, and thus involving local services and considering the local context are vital. The use of chemoprophylaxis continues to be recommended by the SoNG, and in this case was considered to be an important adjunct to other management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信