重病教育中的精神性:2000 - 2024年医学院课程的叙事回顾。

Q2 Social Sciences
Luke Okamuro, Meachelle Lum, January Turner, Christine Liu, Janet Ma, Christopher Ahn, Bethia Kwok, David Larson, Andre Cipta
{"title":"重病教育中的精神性:2000 - 2024年医学院课程的叙事回顾。","authors":"Luke Okamuro, Meachelle Lum, January Turner, Christine Liu, Janet Ma, Christopher Ahn, Bethia Kwok, David Larson, Andre Cipta","doi":"10.7812/TPP/25.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spirituality is increasingly recognized as an integral component of patient-centered care in serious illness. Despite substantial evidence supporting its benefits, the integration of spiritual care into medical education remains inconsistent. This narrative review examines how spiritual care is incorporated into serious illness curricula in medical schools and evaluates its impact on student learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles published between 2000 and 2024 describing medical school curricula addressing spiritual care in palliative care, serious illness, hospice, or end-of-life care were reviewed. Studies were categorized using the Kirkpatrick 4-tier framework to evaluate educational outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1974 studies screened, 85 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 31 (36.5%) explicitly mentioned spirituality as part of the curricula. Only 16 studies (18.8%) assessed student growth in spiritual care competencies, focusing primarily on student reactions (n = 9), followed by changes in self-reported efficacy (n = 5), knowledge gains (n = 2), and skill gains (n = 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite evidence linking spirituality to improved health outcomes in serious illness, spiritual care remains underrepresented in medical school curricula. Substantial variability in teaching methods and assessment strategies highlights the need for structured, evidence-informed frameworks to better prepare future physicians to address the spiritual needs of patients facing serious illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spirituality in Serious Illness Education: A Narrative Review of Medical School Curricula From 2000 to 2024.\",\"authors\":\"Luke Okamuro, Meachelle Lum, January Turner, Christine Liu, Janet Ma, Christopher Ahn, Bethia Kwok, David Larson, Andre Cipta\",\"doi\":\"10.7812/TPP/25.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spirituality is increasingly recognized as an integral component of patient-centered care in serious illness. Despite substantial evidence supporting its benefits, the integration of spiritual care into medical education remains inconsistent. This narrative review examines how spiritual care is incorporated into serious illness curricula in medical schools and evaluates its impact on student learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles published between 2000 and 2024 describing medical school curricula addressing spiritual care in palliative care, serious illness, hospice, or end-of-life care were reviewed. Studies were categorized using the Kirkpatrick 4-tier framework to evaluate educational outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1974 studies screened, 85 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 31 (36.5%) explicitly mentioned spirituality as part of the curricula. Only 16 studies (18.8%) assessed student growth in spiritual care competencies, focusing primarily on student reactions (n = 9), followed by changes in self-reported efficacy (n = 5), knowledge gains (n = 2), and skill gains (n = 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite evidence linking spirituality to improved health outcomes in serious illness, spiritual care remains underrepresented in medical school curricula. Substantial variability in teaching methods and assessment strategies highlights the need for structured, evidence-informed frameworks to better prepare future physicians to address the spiritual needs of patients facing serious illness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Permanente journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Permanente journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/25.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/25.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:灵性越来越被认为是在严重疾病中以病人为中心的护理的一个组成部分。尽管有大量证据支持其益处,但将精神关怀纳入医学教育仍然不一致。这篇叙述性的评论探讨了精神关怀是如何被纳入医学院校的严重疾病课程,并评估其对学生学习的影响。方法:回顾2000年至2024年间发表的描述医学院课程中关于姑息治疗、严重疾病、临终关怀或临终关怀的精神护理的文章。研究使用Kirkpatrick 4层框架进行分类,以评估教育成果。结果:在筛选的1974项研究中,有85项符合纳入标准。其中,31所(36.5%)明确提到灵性是课程的一部分。只有16项研究(18.8%)评估了学生在精神关怀能力方面的成长,主要关注学生的反应(n = 9),其次是自我报告效能(n = 5)、知识收获(n = 2)和技能收获(n = 1)的变化。结论:尽管有证据表明精神与改善严重疾病的健康结果有关,但精神护理在医学院课程中的代表性仍然不足。教学方法和评估策略的巨大差异突出了对结构化、循证框架的需求,以更好地为未来的医生做好准备,以解决面临严重疾病的患者的精神需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spirituality in Serious Illness Education: A Narrative Review of Medical School Curricula From 2000 to 2024.

Introduction: Spirituality is increasingly recognized as an integral component of patient-centered care in serious illness. Despite substantial evidence supporting its benefits, the integration of spiritual care into medical education remains inconsistent. This narrative review examines how spiritual care is incorporated into serious illness curricula in medical schools and evaluates its impact on student learning.

Methods: Articles published between 2000 and 2024 describing medical school curricula addressing spiritual care in palliative care, serious illness, hospice, or end-of-life care were reviewed. Studies were categorized using the Kirkpatrick 4-tier framework to evaluate educational outcomes.

Results: Among the 1974 studies screened, 85 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 31 (36.5%) explicitly mentioned spirituality as part of the curricula. Only 16 studies (18.8%) assessed student growth in spiritual care competencies, focusing primarily on student reactions (n = 9), followed by changes in self-reported efficacy (n = 5), knowledge gains (n = 2), and skill gains (n = 1).

Conclusion: Despite evidence linking spirituality to improved health outcomes in serious illness, spiritual care remains underrepresented in medical school curricula. Substantial variability in teaching methods and assessment strategies highlights the need for structured, evidence-informed frameworks to better prepare future physicians to address the spiritual needs of patients facing serious illness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Permanente journal
The Permanente journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信