侧柱调整联合前纵韧带松解与三柱截骨治疗七十岁老人胸腰椎后凸:回顾性比较队列研究。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Xue-Peng Wei, Hung-Lun Hsieh, Qing-De Wang, Yi-Hsun Huang, Erh-Ti Ernest Lin, Chen-Wei Yeh, Yuan-Shun Lo
{"title":"侧柱调整联合前纵韧带松解与三柱截骨治疗七十岁老人胸腰椎后凸:回顾性比较队列研究。","authors":"Xue-Peng Wei, Hung-Lun Hsieh, Qing-De Wang, Yi-Hsun Huang, Erh-Ti Ernest Lin, Chen-Wei Yeh, Yuan-Shun Lo","doi":"10.1111/os.70176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adult thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) impairs the quality of life. Traditional 3CO provides correction but carries a high risk of complications, especially in the elderly. Minimally invasive anterior approaches may be safer. This study aims to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of septuagenarians with thoracolumbar kyphosis treated with single-position navigated lateral column realignment with anterior longitudinal ligament release (LCR-A) plus posterior column osteotomy (PCO) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF), or percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) versus three-column osteotomy (3CO).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 21 patients with LCR-A and 54 with 3CO prospectively treated between March 2020 and April 2024. Radiographic parameters, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SRS-22 scores, complications, and perioperative data were analyzed over a 2-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although LCR-A patients were older, they had significantly reduced blood loss, shorter operative times, and fewer fused levels than 3CO patients. LCR-A achieved comparable deformity correction, with fewer complications, lower postoperative ODI, and better SRS-22 scores. The LCR-A group maintained radiographic correction, with fewer new neurological deficits and lower rates of infection, ileus, and delirium.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single-position navigated LCR-A is a safer and less invasive alternative to 3CO in elderly patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis, offering effective deformity correction, fewer complications, improved functional outcomes, and enhanced recovery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lateral Column Realignment Combined With Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Release Versus Three-Column Osteotomy in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Kyphosis in Septuagenarians: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Xue-Peng Wei, Hung-Lun Hsieh, Qing-De Wang, Yi-Hsun Huang, Erh-Ti Ernest Lin, Chen-Wei Yeh, Yuan-Shun Lo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/os.70176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adult thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) impairs the quality of life. Traditional 3CO provides correction but carries a high risk of complications, especially in the elderly. Minimally invasive anterior approaches may be safer. This study aims to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of septuagenarians with thoracolumbar kyphosis treated with single-position navigated lateral column realignment with anterior longitudinal ligament release (LCR-A) plus posterior column osteotomy (PCO) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF), or percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) versus three-column osteotomy (3CO).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 21 patients with LCR-A and 54 with 3CO prospectively treated between March 2020 and April 2024. Radiographic parameters, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SRS-22 scores, complications, and perioperative data were analyzed over a 2-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although LCR-A patients were older, they had significantly reduced blood loss, shorter operative times, and fewer fused levels than 3CO patients. LCR-A achieved comparable deformity correction, with fewer complications, lower postoperative ODI, and better SRS-22 scores. The LCR-A group maintained radiographic correction, with fewer new neurological deficits and lower rates of infection, ileus, and delirium.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single-position navigated LCR-A is a safer and less invasive alternative to 3CO in elderly patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis, offering effective deformity correction, fewer complications, improved functional outcomes, and enhanced recovery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70176\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70176","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:成人胸腰椎后凸继发于骨质疏松性椎体骨折(OVF)影响生活质量。传统的3CO提供矫正,但有很高的并发症风险,特别是在老年人中。微创前路可能更安全。本研究的目的是比较七十多岁的胸腰椎后凸患者采用单位导航侧柱复位联合前纵韧带松解(LCR-A) +后路柱截骨术(PCO) +后路脊柱融合术(PSF),或经皮椎弓根螺钉(PPS)与三柱截骨术(3CO)治疗的影像学和临床结果。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2020年3月至2024年4月期间前瞻性治疗的21例LCR-A患者和54例3CO患者。随访2年,分析影像学参数、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、SRS-22评分、并发症和围手术期数据。结果:尽管LCR-A患者年龄较大,但与3CO患者相比,LCR-A患者的出血量明显减少,手术时间更短,融合水平更低。LCR-A实现了类似的畸形矫正,并发症更少,术后ODI更低,SRS-22评分更高。LCR-A组维持影像学矫正,新发神经功能缺损较少,感染、肠梗阻和谵妄的发生率较低。结论:对于老年胸腰椎后凸患者,单位导航LCR-A是一种更安全、侵入性更小的替代方案,可提供有效的畸形矫正、更少的并发症、改善的功能结果和增强的恢复。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lateral Column Realignment Combined With Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Release Versus Three-Column Osteotomy in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Kyphosis in Septuagenarians: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.

Objective: Adult thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) impairs the quality of life. Traditional 3CO provides correction but carries a high risk of complications, especially in the elderly. Minimally invasive anterior approaches may be safer. This study aims to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of septuagenarians with thoracolumbar kyphosis treated with single-position navigated lateral column realignment with anterior longitudinal ligament release (LCR-A) plus posterior column osteotomy (PCO) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF), or percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) versus three-column osteotomy (3CO).

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 21 patients with LCR-A and 54 with 3CO prospectively treated between March 2020 and April 2024. Radiographic parameters, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SRS-22 scores, complications, and perioperative data were analyzed over a 2-year follow-up period.

Results: Although LCR-A patients were older, they had significantly reduced blood loss, shorter operative times, and fewer fused levels than 3CO patients. LCR-A achieved comparable deformity correction, with fewer complications, lower postoperative ODI, and better SRS-22 scores. The LCR-A group maintained radiographic correction, with fewer new neurological deficits and lower rates of infection, ileus, and delirium.

Conclusions: Single-position navigated LCR-A is a safer and less invasive alternative to 3CO in elderly patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis, offering effective deformity correction, fewer complications, improved functional outcomes, and enhanced recovery.

Level of evidence: IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信