超越危险因素:重新思考乙肝和丙肝筛查在初级保健。

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Elena Vargas-Accarino, Ariadna Rando-Segura, María Asunción Úbeda, Imma Valls, Carla Ventosa, Núria García, Ingrid Arcusa, Elena Monserrate, Eva de Diego, Marta Selvi, Adriana Palom, Marina Llorens, Maria Santos, Judit Romero-Vico, Artur Dalfo, Juan Carlos Ruiz-Cobo, Ester Pallares, María Buti
{"title":"超越危险因素:重新思考乙肝和丙肝筛查在初级保健。","authors":"Elena Vargas-Accarino,&nbsp;Ariadna Rando-Segura,&nbsp;María Asunción Úbeda,&nbsp;Imma Valls,&nbsp;Carla Ventosa,&nbsp;Núria García,&nbsp;Ingrid Arcusa,&nbsp;Elena Monserrate,&nbsp;Eva de Diego,&nbsp;Marta Selvi,&nbsp;Adriana Palom,&nbsp;Marina Llorens,&nbsp;Maria Santos,&nbsp;Judit Romero-Vico,&nbsp;Artur Dalfo,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Ruiz-Cobo,&nbsp;Ester Pallares,&nbsp;María Buti","doi":"10.1111/liv.70330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Most international guidelines recommend screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) only for individuals with risk factors or elevated ALT levels. However, this approach may not suffice to eradicate viral hepatitis. This study evaluates the application of EASL HBV and HCV screening guidelines in primary care centres (PCCs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study included two components: (1) A retrospective review (January 2021–March 2023) of microbiology data to determine testing rates, analyse clinical characteristics, and assess management; and (2) A prospective intervention (March–April 2024) involving HBV and HCV screening and risk factor surveys for all adults attending two PCCs for blood collection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the retrospective analysis of 90 170 patients, HBV and HCV screening rates were 16% and 10%, respectively. Among HBsAg-positive patients (<i>n</i> = 84 (0.5%)), 67% lacked risk factors or elevated ALT. Among anti-HCV-positive (<i>n</i> = 277 (3%)) and HCV RNA-positive (<i>n</i> = 45 (0.5%)) patients, 54% and 46% respectively lacked these indicators.</p>\n \n <p>In the prospective study of 1030 patients (mean age 55, 39.6% men, 73% Spanish), anti-HCV was detected in 1.16% of cases (HCV RNA in 0.19%). Of these, 67% lacked risk factors or elevated ALT. No HBsAg-positive cases were identified, and hepatitis B vaccination status was uncertain for 50% of patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Risk factor-based screening for HBV and HCV in primary care is a suboptimal approach. More than half of the patients testing positive lacked identifiable risk factors or elevated ALT levels. Universal one-time screening for all adults could address these limitations and significantly advance viral hepatitis elimination efforts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18101,"journal":{"name":"Liver International","volume":"45 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/liv.70330","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Risk Factors: Rethinking Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Screening in Primary Care\",\"authors\":\"Elena Vargas-Accarino,&nbsp;Ariadna Rando-Segura,&nbsp;María Asunción Úbeda,&nbsp;Imma Valls,&nbsp;Carla Ventosa,&nbsp;Núria García,&nbsp;Ingrid Arcusa,&nbsp;Elena Monserrate,&nbsp;Eva de Diego,&nbsp;Marta Selvi,&nbsp;Adriana Palom,&nbsp;Marina Llorens,&nbsp;Maria Santos,&nbsp;Judit Romero-Vico,&nbsp;Artur Dalfo,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Ruiz-Cobo,&nbsp;Ester Pallares,&nbsp;María Buti\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/liv.70330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Most international guidelines recommend screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) only for individuals with risk factors or elevated ALT levels. However, this approach may not suffice to eradicate viral hepatitis. This study evaluates the application of EASL HBV and HCV screening guidelines in primary care centres (PCCs).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study included two components: (1) A retrospective review (January 2021–March 2023) of microbiology data to determine testing rates, analyse clinical characteristics, and assess management; and (2) A prospective intervention (March–April 2024) involving HBV and HCV screening and risk factor surveys for all adults attending two PCCs for blood collection.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the retrospective analysis of 90 170 patients, HBV and HCV screening rates were 16% and 10%, respectively. Among HBsAg-positive patients (<i>n</i> = 84 (0.5%)), 67% lacked risk factors or elevated ALT. Among anti-HCV-positive (<i>n</i> = 277 (3%)) and HCV RNA-positive (<i>n</i> = 45 (0.5%)) patients, 54% and 46% respectively lacked these indicators.</p>\\n \\n <p>In the prospective study of 1030 patients (mean age 55, 39.6% men, 73% Spanish), anti-HCV was detected in 1.16% of cases (HCV RNA in 0.19%). Of these, 67% lacked risk factors or elevated ALT. No HBsAg-positive cases were identified, and hepatitis B vaccination status was uncertain for 50% of patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Risk factor-based screening for HBV and HCV in primary care is a suboptimal approach. More than half of the patients testing positive lacked identifiable risk factors or elevated ALT levels. Universal one-time screening for all adults could address these limitations and significantly advance viral hepatitis elimination efforts.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liver International\",\"volume\":\"45 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/liv.70330\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liver International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/liv.70330\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/liv.70330","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数国际指南建议仅对具有危险因素或ALT水平升高的个体进行乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)和丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)筛查。然而,这种方法可能不足以根除病毒性肝炎。本研究评估EASL HBV和HCV筛查指南在初级保健中心(PCCs)的应用。方法:本研究包括两个组成部分:(1)回顾性分析微生物学数据(2021年1月- 2023年3月),确定检测率、分析临床特征并评估管理;(2)一项前瞻性干预(2024年3月至4月),涉及HBV和HCV筛查和风险因素调查,对参加两次PCCs的所有成年人进行采血。结果:回顾性分析90170例患者,HBV和HCV筛查率分别为16%和10%。在hbsag阳性患者(n = 84(0.5%))中,67%的患者缺乏危险因素或ALT升高。在抗HCV阳性患者(n = 277(3%))和HCV rna阳性患者(n = 45(0.5%))中,分别有54%和46%的患者缺乏这些指标。在1030例患者(平均年龄55岁,39.6%为男性,73%为西班牙人)的前瞻性研究中,1.16%的病例检测到抗-HCV(0.19%为HCV RNA)。其中67%缺乏危险因素或ALT升高。未发现hbsag阳性病例,50%的患者乙肝疫苗接种情况不确定。结论:初级保健中基于危险因素的HBV和HCV筛查是一种次优方法。超过一半的检测呈阳性的患者缺乏可识别的危险因素或ALT水平升高。对所有成年人进行普遍的一次性筛查可以解决这些局限性,并显著推进消除病毒性肝炎的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Beyond Risk Factors: Rethinking Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Screening in Primary Care

Beyond Risk Factors: Rethinking Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Screening in Primary Care

Introduction

Most international guidelines recommend screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) only for individuals with risk factors or elevated ALT levels. However, this approach may not suffice to eradicate viral hepatitis. This study evaluates the application of EASL HBV and HCV screening guidelines in primary care centres (PCCs).

Methods

The study included two components: (1) A retrospective review (January 2021–March 2023) of microbiology data to determine testing rates, analyse clinical characteristics, and assess management; and (2) A prospective intervention (March–April 2024) involving HBV and HCV screening and risk factor surveys for all adults attending two PCCs for blood collection.

Results

In the retrospective analysis of 90 170 patients, HBV and HCV screening rates were 16% and 10%, respectively. Among HBsAg-positive patients (n = 84 (0.5%)), 67% lacked risk factors or elevated ALT. Among anti-HCV-positive (n = 277 (3%)) and HCV RNA-positive (n = 45 (0.5%)) patients, 54% and 46% respectively lacked these indicators.

In the prospective study of 1030 patients (mean age 55, 39.6% men, 73% Spanish), anti-HCV was detected in 1.16% of cases (HCV RNA in 0.19%). Of these, 67% lacked risk factors or elevated ALT. No HBsAg-positive cases were identified, and hepatitis B vaccination status was uncertain for 50% of patients.

Conclusion

Risk factor-based screening for HBV and HCV in primary care is a suboptimal approach. More than half of the patients testing positive lacked identifiable risk factors or elevated ALT levels. Universal one-time screening for all adults could address these limitations and significantly advance viral hepatitis elimination efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Liver International
Liver International 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
348
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Liver International promotes all aspects of the science of hepatology from basic research to applied clinical studies. Providing an international forum for the publication of high-quality original research in hepatology, it is an essential resource for everyone working on normal and abnormal structure and function in the liver and its constituent cells, including clinicians and basic scientists involved in the multi-disciplinary field of hepatology. The journal welcomes articles from all fields of hepatology, which may be published as original articles, brief definitive reports, reviews, mini-reviews, images in hepatology and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信