英联邦和部分非洲国家卫生部门对基于性别的暴力和性生殖健康项目的反应:混合方法系统评价和荟萃分析的议定书。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Refilwe Nancy Phaswana-Mafuya, Edith Phalane, Nompumelelo Zungu, Alfred Musekiwa, Lebogang Ramalepe, Kayla Bagg, Peter Nyasulu, Olive Shisana
{"title":"英联邦和部分非洲国家卫生部门对基于性别的暴力和性生殖健康项目的反应:混合方法系统评价和荟萃分析的议定书。","authors":"Refilwe Nancy Phaswana-Mafuya, Edith Phalane, Nompumelelo Zungu, Alfred Musekiwa, Lebogang Ramalepe, Kayla Bagg, Peter Nyasulu, Olive Shisana","doi":"10.2196/67571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intertwining nature of gender-based violence (GBV) and violence perpetrated against women and girls (VAWG), as well as sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR), underlines the urgent need for the health sector to enhance the coordination of services to improve health outcomes. Importantly, GBV and VAWG are intricately linked to a spectrum of SRHR challenges, ranging from unintended pregnancies to severe maternal, gynecological, and mental health outcomes. Cumulative GBV had a more significant effect on abortion risk than associated variables. Recognizing the interplay between GBV, VAWG, and SRHR highlights the necessity for a comprehensive health sector response. A systematic review of the health sector response to GBV, VAWG, and SRHR will be conducted to understand the extent and array of health facility-based coordinated responses to GBV, VAWG, and SRHR; lessons learned; and successes and challenges in the Commonwealth and selected African countries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to understand the context of GBV, VAWG, and SRHR by conducting a comprehensive review of health sector responses in different national, cultural, and socioeconomic contexts, and we aim to share best practices, experiences, and lessons learned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods systematic review will be conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines. The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome framework will be applied to screen and select relevant sources guided by the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review will include relevant research papers published in the last 15 years and conducted in the 24 Commonwealth and 7 selected African countries. Electronic databases to be searched will include PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, EBSCOhost, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane, CINAHL, Index Medicus for the Eastern Mediterranean Region, and POPline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ethics approval will be waived as the study will use data in the public domain. The project has been commissioned by the Commonwealth Secretariat (2022-2025). The database search, data screening, and data extraction process for the review will be completed by September 2025. A manuscript will be submitted to a peer-reviewed international journal by November 2025. The initial online database searches, citations of eligible studies, and Microsoft Copilot identified 38,200 studies focusing on GBV, VAWG, and SRHR interventions. To date, 60 studies have been found eligible for inclusion in the review. The majority of these studies were conducted in eastern Africa (n=34), South Africa (n=14), and Asia (n=13). Evidence generated from this review will be made available through journal publications, seminars and workshops with key stakeholders, ministries of health, and local and international conferences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study will generate evidence to inform recommendations on addressing and mitigating the effects of GBV and VAWG on SRHR outcomes and coordinated services in the health sectors of Commonwealth and selected African countries.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024520594; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024520594.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>PRR1-10.2196/67571.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":"14 ","pages":"e67571"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Health Sector Response to Gender-Based Violence and Sexual Reproductive Health Programs in the Commonwealth and Selected African Countries: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Refilwe Nancy Phaswana-Mafuya, Edith Phalane, Nompumelelo Zungu, Alfred Musekiwa, Lebogang Ramalepe, Kayla Bagg, Peter Nyasulu, Olive Shisana\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/67571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intertwining nature of gender-based violence (GBV) and violence perpetrated against women and girls (VAWG), as well as sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR), underlines the urgent need for the health sector to enhance the coordination of services to improve health outcomes. Importantly, GBV and VAWG are intricately linked to a spectrum of SRHR challenges, ranging from unintended pregnancies to severe maternal, gynecological, and mental health outcomes. Cumulative GBV had a more significant effect on abortion risk than associated variables. Recognizing the interplay between GBV, VAWG, and SRHR highlights the necessity for a comprehensive health sector response. A systematic review of the health sector response to GBV, VAWG, and SRHR will be conducted to understand the extent and array of health facility-based coordinated responses to GBV, VAWG, and SRHR; lessons learned; and successes and challenges in the Commonwealth and selected African countries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to understand the context of GBV, VAWG, and SRHR by conducting a comprehensive review of health sector responses in different national, cultural, and socioeconomic contexts, and we aim to share best practices, experiences, and lessons learned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods systematic review will be conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines. The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome framework will be applied to screen and select relevant sources guided by the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review will include relevant research papers published in the last 15 years and conducted in the 24 Commonwealth and 7 selected African countries. Electronic databases to be searched will include PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, EBSCOhost, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane, CINAHL, Index Medicus for the Eastern Mediterranean Region, and POPline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ethics approval will be waived as the study will use data in the public domain. The project has been commissioned by the Commonwealth Secretariat (2022-2025). The database search, data screening, and data extraction process for the review will be completed by September 2025. A manuscript will be submitted to a peer-reviewed international journal by November 2025. The initial online database searches, citations of eligible studies, and Microsoft Copilot identified 38,200 studies focusing on GBV, VAWG, and SRHR interventions. To date, 60 studies have been found eligible for inclusion in the review. The majority of these studies were conducted in eastern Africa (n=34), South Africa (n=14), and Asia (n=13). Evidence generated from this review will be made available through journal publications, seminars and workshops with key stakeholders, ministries of health, and local and international conferences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study will generate evidence to inform recommendations on addressing and mitigating the effects of GBV and VAWG on SRHR outcomes and coordinated services in the health sectors of Commonwealth and selected African countries.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024520594; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024520594.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>PRR1-10.2196/67571.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"e67571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491884/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/67571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/67571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于性别的暴力(GBV)和对妇女和女孩的暴力(VAWG)以及性健康和生殖健康权利(SRHR)交织在一起,突出表明卫生部门迫切需要加强服务协调,以改善健康结果。重要的是,性别暴力和女性暴力与一系列性暴力和性别风险挑战有着复杂的联系,从意外怀孕到严重的孕产妇、妇科和精神健康后果。与相关变量相比,累计GBV对流产风险的影响更为显著。认识到基于性别的暴力、妇女暴力和性别暴力之间的相互作用,突出了卫生部门采取全面应对措施的必要性。将对卫生部门应对基于性别的暴力、妇女暴力和性别暴力的行为进行系统审查,以了解基于卫生设施的针对基于性别的暴力、妇女暴力和性别暴力的协调应对的程度和范围;经验教训;以及英联邦和某些非洲国家的成功和挑战。目标:我们的目标是通过对不同国家、文化和社会经济背景下卫生部门的应对措施进行全面审查,了解性别暴力、妇女暴力和性别暴力的背景,我们的目标是分享最佳做法、经验和教训。方法:按照系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)指南进行混合方法系统评价。在纳入和排除标准的指导下,应用人群、干预、比较和结果框架筛选和选择相关来源。审查将包括过去15年在24个英联邦国家和7个选定的非洲国家发表的相关研究论文。搜索的电子数据库包括PubMed、谷歌Scholar、Science Direct、EBSCOhost、Web of Science、Embase、PsycINFO、Cochrane、CINAHL、Index Medicus for Eastern Mediterranean Region和POPline。结果:伦理审批将被豁免,因为该研究将使用公共领域的数据。该项目由英联邦秘书处(2022-2025)委托。评审的数据库检索、数据筛选和数据提取过程将于2025年9月前完成。论文将于2025年11月前提交给同行评议的国际期刊。最初的在线数据库搜索、合格研究的引用和Microsoft Copilot确定了38,200项研究,重点关注GBV、VAWG和SRHR干预。迄今为止,已发现60项研究符合纳入该综述的条件。这些研究大多在东非(n=34)、南非(n=14)和亚洲(n=13)进行。本次审查产生的证据将通过期刊出版物、与主要利益攸关方、卫生部以及地方和国际会议举行的研讨会和讲习班提供。结论:该研究将产生证据,为解决和减轻基于性别的暴力和妇女暴力对英联邦和部分非洲国家卫生部门的SRHR结果和协调服务的影响提供建议。试验注册:PROSPERO CRD42024520594;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024520594.International注册报告标识符(irrid): PRR1-10.2196/67571。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Health Sector Response to Gender-Based Violence and Sexual Reproductive Health Programs in the Commonwealth and Selected African Countries: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Health Sector Response to Gender-Based Violence and Sexual Reproductive Health Programs in the Commonwealth and Selected African Countries: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The intertwining nature of gender-based violence (GBV) and violence perpetrated against women and girls (VAWG), as well as sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR), underlines the urgent need for the health sector to enhance the coordination of services to improve health outcomes. Importantly, GBV and VAWG are intricately linked to a spectrum of SRHR challenges, ranging from unintended pregnancies to severe maternal, gynecological, and mental health outcomes. Cumulative GBV had a more significant effect on abortion risk than associated variables. Recognizing the interplay between GBV, VAWG, and SRHR highlights the necessity for a comprehensive health sector response. A systematic review of the health sector response to GBV, VAWG, and SRHR will be conducted to understand the extent and array of health facility-based coordinated responses to GBV, VAWG, and SRHR; lessons learned; and successes and challenges in the Commonwealth and selected African countries.

Objective: We aim to understand the context of GBV, VAWG, and SRHR by conducting a comprehensive review of health sector responses in different national, cultural, and socioeconomic contexts, and we aim to share best practices, experiences, and lessons learned.

Methods: A mixed methods systematic review will be conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines. The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome framework will be applied to screen and select relevant sources guided by the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review will include relevant research papers published in the last 15 years and conducted in the 24 Commonwealth and 7 selected African countries. Electronic databases to be searched will include PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, EBSCOhost, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane, CINAHL, Index Medicus for the Eastern Mediterranean Region, and POPline.

Results: Ethics approval will be waived as the study will use data in the public domain. The project has been commissioned by the Commonwealth Secretariat (2022-2025). The database search, data screening, and data extraction process for the review will be completed by September 2025. A manuscript will be submitted to a peer-reviewed international journal by November 2025. The initial online database searches, citations of eligible studies, and Microsoft Copilot identified 38,200 studies focusing on GBV, VAWG, and SRHR interventions. To date, 60 studies have been found eligible for inclusion in the review. The majority of these studies were conducted in eastern Africa (n=34), South Africa (n=14), and Asia (n=13). Evidence generated from this review will be made available through journal publications, seminars and workshops with key stakeholders, ministries of health, and local and international conferences.

Conclusions: The study will generate evidence to inform recommendations on addressing and mitigating the effects of GBV and VAWG on SRHR outcomes and coordinated services in the health sectors of Commonwealth and selected African countries.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42024520594; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024520594.

International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/67571.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信