{"title":"希望行走:内翻足治疗对埃塞俄比亚人类繁荣的影响。","authors":"Bruce Wydick, Gianna Camacho, Patrizio Piraino","doi":"10.1002/hec.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children born with severe congenital conditions in low-income countries rank among the most disadvantaged among the global ultra-poor. We study the impact of clubfoot and its treatment across multiple dimensions of human flourishing on data collected from 564 children in Ethiopia. Working with Hope Walks, an organization that funds clubfoot interventions in numerous countries, we use a quasi difference-in-differences approach that generates counterfactual outcomes from the nearest-age siblings of children born with clubfoot, nested within a family-level fixed effect. We find that clubfoot status (early treatment) results in an impairment (restoration) of -1.44 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> (0.91 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> ) in physical mobility, -1.17 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> (0.79 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> ) in mental health, -1.07 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> (0.64 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> ) in social inclusion, -0.48 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> (0.98 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> ) in an education index, -0.76 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> (0.42 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> ) in religious faith, and -1.32 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> (0.94 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> ) in an aggregate index of human flourishing (all <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.05</mn></mrow> <annotation>$p< 0.05$</annotation></semantics> </math> ). We attribute the large, broad, and significant impacts from clubfoot treatment to (i) a highly effective medical intervention that is (ii) carried out in an impoverished setting with scarce existing support for children born with disabilities, which (iii) broadly generates spillover effects across key development outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hope Walks: The Impact of Clubfoot Treatment on Human Flourishing in Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Bruce Wydick, Gianna Camacho, Patrizio Piraino\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hec.70040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Children born with severe congenital conditions in low-income countries rank among the most disadvantaged among the global ultra-poor. We study the impact of clubfoot and its treatment across multiple dimensions of human flourishing on data collected from 564 children in Ethiopia. Working with Hope Walks, an organization that funds clubfoot interventions in numerous countries, we use a quasi difference-in-differences approach that generates counterfactual outcomes from the nearest-age siblings of children born with clubfoot, nested within a family-level fixed effect. We find that clubfoot status (early treatment) results in an impairment (restoration) of -1.44 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> (0.91 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> ) in physical mobility, -1.17 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> (0.79 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> ) in mental health, -1.07 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> (0.64 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> ) in social inclusion, -0.48 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> (0.98 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> ) in an education index, -0.76 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> (0.42 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> ) in religious faith, and -1.32 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> (0.94 <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\\\sigma $</annotation></semantics> </math> ) in an aggregate index of human flourishing (all <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.05</mn></mrow> <annotation>$p< 0.05$</annotation></semantics> </math> ). We attribute the large, broad, and significant impacts from clubfoot treatment to (i) a highly effective medical intervention that is (ii) carried out in an impoverished setting with scarce existing support for children born with disabilities, which (iii) broadly generates spillover effects across key development outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70040\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hope Walks: The Impact of Clubfoot Treatment on Human Flourishing in Ethiopia.
Children born with severe congenital conditions in low-income countries rank among the most disadvantaged among the global ultra-poor. We study the impact of clubfoot and its treatment across multiple dimensions of human flourishing on data collected from 564 children in Ethiopia. Working with Hope Walks, an organization that funds clubfoot interventions in numerous countries, we use a quasi difference-in-differences approach that generates counterfactual outcomes from the nearest-age siblings of children born with clubfoot, nested within a family-level fixed effect. We find that clubfoot status (early treatment) results in an impairment (restoration) of -1.44 (0.91 ) in physical mobility, -1.17 (0.79 ) in mental health, -1.07 (0.64 ) in social inclusion, -0.48 (0.98 ) in an education index, -0.76 (0.42 ) in religious faith, and -1.32 (0.94 ) in an aggregate index of human flourishing (all ). We attribute the large, broad, and significant impacts from clubfoot treatment to (i) a highly effective medical intervention that is (ii) carried out in an impoverished setting with scarce existing support for children born with disabilities, which (iii) broadly generates spillover effects across key development outcomes.
期刊介绍:
This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems.
Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses.
Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.