{"title":"从承诺到实践:人工智能在重症监护中的路线图。","authors":"Geoffray Agard , Sami Hraiech , Tobias Gauss","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) has regained strong momentum in medicine, driven by unprecedented computing power and the availability of massive clinical datasets. Intensive care units (ICUs) are at the forefront of this movement, given their unique combination of high data density, decision-making under uncertainty, and the vulnerability of critically ill patients. Yet despite the abundance of proof-of-concept studies, the clinical translation of AI tools remains strikingly limited, with fewer than 2 % of published algorithms prospectively evaluated in real-world ICU settings.</div><div>In this editorial, we discuss the roadmap proposed by Workum et al., which outlines a progressive, risk-aligned framework for the integration of AI in critical care. Beyond model performance, the authors emphasize fundamental values such as fairness, explainability, and accountability, while highlighting the practical challenges of data interoperability, infrastructure, governance, and liability. Their work reminds us that AI adoption is not primarily hindered by algorithms themselves but by the surrounding ecosystem of data quality, regulatory clarity, and clinician trust.</div><div>We argue that the true promise of AI in the ICU lies not in rapid technological breakthroughs but in careful, evidence-based, and human-centered implementation. Whether these systems will ultimately improve patient-centered outcomes remains uncertain. The roadmap by Workum et al. should therefore be read as a call for cautious progress: to begin with low-risk applications, to invest in infrastructure and interdisciplinary collaboration, and to rigorously evaluate clinical benefit before moving toward high-stakes medical decision support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 155263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From promise to practice: A roadmap for artificial intelligence in critical care\",\"authors\":\"Geoffray Agard , Sami Hraiech , Tobias Gauss\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) has regained strong momentum in medicine, driven by unprecedented computing power and the availability of massive clinical datasets. Intensive care units (ICUs) are at the forefront of this movement, given their unique combination of high data density, decision-making under uncertainty, and the vulnerability of critically ill patients. Yet despite the abundance of proof-of-concept studies, the clinical translation of AI tools remains strikingly limited, with fewer than 2 % of published algorithms prospectively evaluated in real-world ICU settings.</div><div>In this editorial, we discuss the roadmap proposed by Workum et al., which outlines a progressive, risk-aligned framework for the integration of AI in critical care. Beyond model performance, the authors emphasize fundamental values such as fairness, explainability, and accountability, while highlighting the practical challenges of data interoperability, infrastructure, governance, and liability. Their work reminds us that AI adoption is not primarily hindered by algorithms themselves but by the surrounding ecosystem of data quality, regulatory clarity, and clinician trust.</div><div>We argue that the true promise of AI in the ICU lies not in rapid technological breakthroughs but in careful, evidence-based, and human-centered implementation. Whether these systems will ultimately improve patient-centered outcomes remains uncertain. The roadmap by Workum et al. should therefore be read as a call for cautious progress: to begin with low-risk applications, to invest in infrastructure and interdisciplinary collaboration, and to rigorously evaluate clinical benefit before moving toward high-stakes medical decision support.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"volume\":\"91 \",\"pages\":\"Article 155263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125002503\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125002503","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
From promise to practice: A roadmap for artificial intelligence in critical care
Artificial intelligence (AI) has regained strong momentum in medicine, driven by unprecedented computing power and the availability of massive clinical datasets. Intensive care units (ICUs) are at the forefront of this movement, given their unique combination of high data density, decision-making under uncertainty, and the vulnerability of critically ill patients. Yet despite the abundance of proof-of-concept studies, the clinical translation of AI tools remains strikingly limited, with fewer than 2 % of published algorithms prospectively evaluated in real-world ICU settings.
In this editorial, we discuss the roadmap proposed by Workum et al., which outlines a progressive, risk-aligned framework for the integration of AI in critical care. Beyond model performance, the authors emphasize fundamental values such as fairness, explainability, and accountability, while highlighting the practical challenges of data interoperability, infrastructure, governance, and liability. Their work reminds us that AI adoption is not primarily hindered by algorithms themselves but by the surrounding ecosystem of data quality, regulatory clarity, and clinician trust.
We argue that the true promise of AI in the ICU lies not in rapid technological breakthroughs but in careful, evidence-based, and human-centered implementation. Whether these systems will ultimately improve patient-centered outcomes remains uncertain. The roadmap by Workum et al. should therefore be read as a call for cautious progress: to begin with low-risk applications, to invest in infrastructure and interdisciplinary collaboration, and to rigorously evaluate clinical benefit before moving toward high-stakes medical decision support.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice.
The Journal will include articles which discuss:
All aspects of health services research in critical care
System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine
The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain
Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery
Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients
The team approach in the OR and ICU
System-based research
Medical ethics
Technology in medicine
Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education
Residency Education.