人类单个神经元的活动是由基底外侧杏仁核的颅内θ波爆发刺激调节的。

IF 6.4 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
eLife Pub Date : 2025-09-19 DOI:10.7554/eLife.106481
Justin M Campbell, Rhiannon L Cowan, Krista L Wahlstrom, Martina K Hollearn, Dylan Jensen, Tyler Davis, Shervin Rahimpour, Ben Shofty, Amir Arain, John D Rolston, Stephan Hamann, Shuo Wang, Lawrence N Eisenman, James Swift, Tao Xie, Peter Brunner, Joseph Manns, Cory Inman, Elliot H Smith, Jon Timothy Willie
{"title":"人类单个神经元的活动是由基底外侧杏仁核的颅内θ波爆发刺激调节的。","authors":"Justin M Campbell, Rhiannon L Cowan, Krista L Wahlstrom, Martina K Hollearn, Dylan Jensen, Tyler Davis, Shervin Rahimpour, Ben Shofty, Amir Arain, John D Rolston, Stephan Hamann, Shuo Wang, Lawrence N Eisenman, James Swift, Tao Xie, Peter Brunner, Joseph Manns, Cory Inman, Elliot H Smith, Jon Timothy Willie","doi":"10.7554/eLife.106481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Direct electrical stimulation of the human brain has been used for numerous clinical and scientific applications. At present, however, little is known about how intracranial stimulation affects activity at the microscale. In this study, we recorded intracranial EEG data from a cohort of patients with medically refractory epilepsy as they completed a visual recognition memory task. During the memory task, brief trains of intracranial theta burst stimulation (TBS) were delivered to the basolateral amygdala (BLA). Using simultaneous microelectrode recordings, we isolated neurons in the hippocampus, amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex and tested whether stimulation enhanced or suppressed firing rates. Additionally, we characterized the properties of modulated neurons, clustered presumed excitatory and inhibitory neurons by waveform morphology, and examined the extent to which modulation affected memory task performance. We observed a subset of neurons (~30%) whose firing rate was modulated by TBS, exhibiting highly heterogeneous responses with respect to onset latency, duration, and direction of effect. Notably, location and baseline activity predicted which neurons were most susceptible to modulation, although the impact of this neuronal modulation on memory remains unclear. These findings advance our limited understanding of how focal electrical fields influence neuronal firing at the single-cell level.</p>","PeriodicalId":11640,"journal":{"name":"eLife","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human single-neuron activity is modulated by intracranial theta burst stimulation of the basolateral amygdala.\",\"authors\":\"Justin M Campbell, Rhiannon L Cowan, Krista L Wahlstrom, Martina K Hollearn, Dylan Jensen, Tyler Davis, Shervin Rahimpour, Ben Shofty, Amir Arain, John D Rolston, Stephan Hamann, Shuo Wang, Lawrence N Eisenman, James Swift, Tao Xie, Peter Brunner, Joseph Manns, Cory Inman, Elliot H Smith, Jon Timothy Willie\",\"doi\":\"10.7554/eLife.106481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Direct electrical stimulation of the human brain has been used for numerous clinical and scientific applications. At present, however, little is known about how intracranial stimulation affects activity at the microscale. In this study, we recorded intracranial EEG data from a cohort of patients with medically refractory epilepsy as they completed a visual recognition memory task. During the memory task, brief trains of intracranial theta burst stimulation (TBS) were delivered to the basolateral amygdala (BLA). Using simultaneous microelectrode recordings, we isolated neurons in the hippocampus, amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex and tested whether stimulation enhanced or suppressed firing rates. Additionally, we characterized the properties of modulated neurons, clustered presumed excitatory and inhibitory neurons by waveform morphology, and examined the extent to which modulation affected memory task performance. We observed a subset of neurons (~30%) whose firing rate was modulated by TBS, exhibiting highly heterogeneous responses with respect to onset latency, duration, and direction of effect. Notably, location and baseline activity predicted which neurons were most susceptible to modulation, although the impact of this neuronal modulation on memory remains unclear. These findings advance our limited understanding of how focal electrical fields influence neuronal firing at the single-cell level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eLife\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448748/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eLife\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.106481\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eLife","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.106481","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直接电刺激人脑已被用于许多临床和科学应用。然而,目前对颅内刺激如何在微观尺度上影响脑活动知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们记录了一组医学难治性癫痫患者在完成视觉识别记忆任务时的颅内脑电图数据。在记忆任务中,向基底外侧杏仁核(BLA)传递短暂的颅内θ波爆发刺激(TBS)。通过同步微电极记录,我们分离了海马、杏仁核、眼窝额叶皮层和前扣带皮层的神经元,并测试了刺激是否增强或抑制了放电率。此外,我们表征了调制神经元的特性,通过波形形态聚类了假定的兴奋性和抑制性神经元,并检查了调制对记忆任务表现的影响程度。我们观察到一个神经元子集(约30%)的放电速率被TBS调节,在发作潜伏期、持续时间和作用方向方面表现出高度异质性的反应。值得注意的是,位置和基线活动预测了哪些神经元最容易受到调节,尽管这种神经元调节对记忆的影响尚不清楚。这些发现促进了我们对聚焦电场如何在单细胞水平上影响神经元放电的有限理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Human single-neuron activity is modulated by intracranial theta burst stimulation of the basolateral amygdala.

Human single-neuron activity is modulated by intracranial theta burst stimulation of the basolateral amygdala.

Human single-neuron activity is modulated by intracranial theta burst stimulation of the basolateral amygdala.

Human single-neuron activity is modulated by intracranial theta burst stimulation of the basolateral amygdala.

Direct electrical stimulation of the human brain has been used for numerous clinical and scientific applications. At present, however, little is known about how intracranial stimulation affects activity at the microscale. In this study, we recorded intracranial EEG data from a cohort of patients with medically refractory epilepsy as they completed a visual recognition memory task. During the memory task, brief trains of intracranial theta burst stimulation (TBS) were delivered to the basolateral amygdala (BLA). Using simultaneous microelectrode recordings, we isolated neurons in the hippocampus, amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex and tested whether stimulation enhanced or suppressed firing rates. Additionally, we characterized the properties of modulated neurons, clustered presumed excitatory and inhibitory neurons by waveform morphology, and examined the extent to which modulation affected memory task performance. We observed a subset of neurons (~30%) whose firing rate was modulated by TBS, exhibiting highly heterogeneous responses with respect to onset latency, duration, and direction of effect. Notably, location and baseline activity predicted which neurons were most susceptible to modulation, although the impact of this neuronal modulation on memory remains unclear. These findings advance our limited understanding of how focal electrical fields influence neuronal firing at the single-cell level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
eLife
eLife BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.90%
发文量
3122
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: eLife is a distinguished, not-for-profit, peer-reviewed open access scientific journal that specializes in the fields of biomedical and life sciences. eLife is known for its selective publication process, which includes a variety of article types such as: Research Articles: Detailed reports of original research findings. Short Reports: Concise presentations of significant findings that do not warrant a full-length research article. Tools and Resources: Descriptions of new tools, technologies, or resources that facilitate scientific research. Research Advances: Brief reports on significant scientific advancements that have immediate implications for the field. Scientific Correspondence: Short communications that comment on or provide additional information related to published articles. Review Articles: Comprehensive overviews of a specific topic or field within the life sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信