卓越诊断:转向诊断性能的提高。

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-09-16 DOI:10.1515/dx-2025-0107
Andrew Auerbach, Katie Raffel, Irit R Rasooly, Jeffrey Schnipper
{"title":"卓越诊断:转向诊断性能的提高。","authors":"Andrew Auerbach, Katie Raffel, Irit R Rasooly, Jeffrey Schnipper","doi":"10.1515/dx-2025-0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The field of diagnostic excellence has advanced considerably in the past decade, reframing diagnosis as a patient safety priority and highlighting the prevalence and harms of diagnostic error. Foundational evidence now supports the development of Diagnostic Excellence Programs; organizational initiatives designed to reduce diagnostic errors and improve system-level and individual performance. While early studies established the epidemiology of diagnostic error across inpatient, emergency, and ambulatory care, newer approaches emphasize continuous, systematic surveillance to inform targeted improvements. Emerging frameworks, such as the DEER Taxonomy and root cause or success cause analyses, help classify drivers of both failures and successes in diagnostic processes. Effective programs must address system factors, including electronic health record design, workload, team structures, and communication, while also enhancing individual clinician performance through feedback, diagnostic reflection, cross-checks, and coaching. Patient engagement represents a critical but underdeveloped dimension; strategies such as structured communication frameworks, patient-family advisory councils, and electronic tools co-designed with patients aim to foster shared diagnostic decision-making and improve transparency. Artificial intelligence (AI) holds promise to accelerate measurement, streamline clinical workflows, reduce cognitive load, and support communication, though careful implementation and oversight are required to ensure safety. Ultimately, Diagnostic Excellence Programs will succeed by embedding diagnostic safety into institutional standards of care, providing clinicians with ongoing, psychologically safe opportunities for recalibration, and leveraging AI to scale surveillance and improvement activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic excellence: turning to diagnostic performance improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Auerbach, Katie Raffel, Irit R Rasooly, Jeffrey Schnipper\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/dx-2025-0107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The field of diagnostic excellence has advanced considerably in the past decade, reframing diagnosis as a patient safety priority and highlighting the prevalence and harms of diagnostic error. Foundational evidence now supports the development of Diagnostic Excellence Programs; organizational initiatives designed to reduce diagnostic errors and improve system-level and individual performance. While early studies established the epidemiology of diagnostic error across inpatient, emergency, and ambulatory care, newer approaches emphasize continuous, systematic surveillance to inform targeted improvements. Emerging frameworks, such as the DEER Taxonomy and root cause or success cause analyses, help classify drivers of both failures and successes in diagnostic processes. Effective programs must address system factors, including electronic health record design, workload, team structures, and communication, while also enhancing individual clinician performance through feedback, diagnostic reflection, cross-checks, and coaching. Patient engagement represents a critical but underdeveloped dimension; strategies such as structured communication frameworks, patient-family advisory councils, and electronic tools co-designed with patients aim to foster shared diagnostic decision-making and improve transparency. Artificial intelligence (AI) holds promise to accelerate measurement, streamline clinical workflows, reduce cognitive load, and support communication, though careful implementation and oversight are required to ensure safety. Ultimately, Diagnostic Excellence Programs will succeed by embedding diagnostic safety into institutional standards of care, providing clinicians with ongoing, psychologically safe opportunities for recalibration, and leveraging AI to scale surveillance and improvement activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卓越诊断领域在过去十年中取得了相当大的进步,将诊断重新定义为患者安全优先事项,并强调了诊断错误的普遍性和危害。基础证据现在支持卓越诊断计划的发展;旨在减少诊断错误和提高系统级和个人性能的组织活动。虽然早期的研究确定了住院、急诊和门诊诊断错误的流行病学,但较新的方法强调持续、系统的监测,以告知有针对性的改进。新兴的框架,如DEER分类法和根本原因或成功原因分析,有助于对诊断过程中失败和成功的驱动因素进行分类。有效的计划必须解决系统因素,包括电子健康记录设计、工作量、团队结构和沟通,同时也通过反馈、诊断反思、交叉检查和指导来提高临床医生的个人表现。患者参与是一个关键但不发达的方面;诸如结构化沟通框架、患者-家属咨询委员会和与患者共同设计的电子工具等战略旨在促进共享诊断决策并提高透明度。人工智能(AI)有望加速测量,简化临床工作流程,减少认知负荷,并支持沟通,但需要仔细实施和监督以确保安全。最终,卓越诊断计划将通过将诊断安全性纳入机构护理标准,为临床医生提供持续的、心理安全的重新校准机会,并利用人工智能扩大监测和改进活动,从而取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic excellence: turning to diagnostic performance improvement.

The field of diagnostic excellence has advanced considerably in the past decade, reframing diagnosis as a patient safety priority and highlighting the prevalence and harms of diagnostic error. Foundational evidence now supports the development of Diagnostic Excellence Programs; organizational initiatives designed to reduce diagnostic errors and improve system-level and individual performance. While early studies established the epidemiology of diagnostic error across inpatient, emergency, and ambulatory care, newer approaches emphasize continuous, systematic surveillance to inform targeted improvements. Emerging frameworks, such as the DEER Taxonomy and root cause or success cause analyses, help classify drivers of both failures and successes in diagnostic processes. Effective programs must address system factors, including electronic health record design, workload, team structures, and communication, while also enhancing individual clinician performance through feedback, diagnostic reflection, cross-checks, and coaching. Patient engagement represents a critical but underdeveloped dimension; strategies such as structured communication frameworks, patient-family advisory councils, and electronic tools co-designed with patients aim to foster shared diagnostic decision-making and improve transparency. Artificial intelligence (AI) holds promise to accelerate measurement, streamline clinical workflows, reduce cognitive load, and support communication, though careful implementation and oversight are required to ensure safety. Ultimately, Diagnostic Excellence Programs will succeed by embedding diagnostic safety into institutional standards of care, providing clinicians with ongoing, psychologically safe opportunities for recalibration, and leveraging AI to scale surveillance and improvement activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnosis
Diagnosis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality.  Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信