改善诊断的全球进展:我们学到了什么,接下来会发生什么。

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-09-18 DOI:10.1515/dx-2025-0109
Taro Shimizu, Wolf E Hautz, Charlotte van Sassen, Laura Zwaan
{"title":"改善诊断的全球进展:我们学到了什么,接下来会发生什么。","authors":"Taro Shimizu, Wolf E Hautz, Charlotte van Sassen, Laura Zwaan","doi":"10.1515/dx-2025-0109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the 2015 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, global awareness of diagnostic safety has grown substantially. Progress has been most visible in high-income countries, with emerging international research networks, conferences, and educational programs. Australia and New Zealand have advanced incident reporting systems, specialty-specific diagnostic safety tools, and educational resources. European initiatives have expanded research on clinical reasoning, bias, and safety-netting, developed competency-based curricula, and investigated digital innovations including decision support systems. Japan has built on a strong tradition of clinical reasoning mastery, advancing theoretical frameworks, cultural analysis, and AI-based diagnostic support, and hosting major regional conferences. Despite these gains, engagement remains uneven, with limited data from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Barriers include resource constraints, underdeveloped infrastructure, and differing disease burdens that challenge the transferability of AI and other innovations. Future progress requires clear, measurable objectives across five domains: research, education, practice improvement, patient engagement, and policy. Recommendations include establishing national diagnostic error databases, promoting multicenter research in underrepresented settings, expanding standardized curricula, implementing structured audit-and-feedback systems, integrating patient perspectives, and embedding diagnostic safety indicators in policy and reimbursement frameworks. International collaboration, context-sensitive methodologies, and robust governance for emerging technologies are critical to ensure equitable improvements. By leveraging shared learning, strengthening capacity in LMICs, and aligning efforts with global policy frameworks, the diagnostic safety movement can evolve from fragmented initiatives to a cohesive, sustainable worldwide strategy, aiming for safer, more reliable diagnosis by 2035.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The global progress for improving diagnosis: what we've learned, what comes next.\",\"authors\":\"Taro Shimizu, Wolf E Hautz, Charlotte van Sassen, Laura Zwaan\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/dx-2025-0109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since the 2015 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, global awareness of diagnostic safety has grown substantially. Progress has been most visible in high-income countries, with emerging international research networks, conferences, and educational programs. Australia and New Zealand have advanced incident reporting systems, specialty-specific diagnostic safety tools, and educational resources. European initiatives have expanded research on clinical reasoning, bias, and safety-netting, developed competency-based curricula, and investigated digital innovations including decision support systems. Japan has built on a strong tradition of clinical reasoning mastery, advancing theoretical frameworks, cultural analysis, and AI-based diagnostic support, and hosting major regional conferences. Despite these gains, engagement remains uneven, with limited data from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Barriers include resource constraints, underdeveloped infrastructure, and differing disease burdens that challenge the transferability of AI and other innovations. Future progress requires clear, measurable objectives across five domains: research, education, practice improvement, patient engagement, and policy. Recommendations include establishing national diagnostic error databases, promoting multicenter research in underrepresented settings, expanding standardized curricula, implementing structured audit-and-feedback systems, integrating patient perspectives, and embedding diagnostic safety indicators in policy and reimbursement frameworks. International collaboration, context-sensitive methodologies, and robust governance for emerging technologies are critical to ensure equitable improvements. By leveraging shared learning, strengthening capacity in LMICs, and aligning efforts with global policy frameworks, the diagnostic safety movement can evolve from fragmented initiatives to a cohesive, sustainable worldwide strategy, aiming for safer, more reliable diagnosis by 2035.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2015年美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院发布关于改善医疗保健诊断的报告以来,全球对诊断安全的认识大大提高。在高收入国家,随着新兴的国际研究网络、会议和教育项目的出现,进展最为明显。澳大利亚和新西兰拥有先进的事故报告系统、专门的安全诊断工具和教育资源。欧洲的倡议扩大了对临床推理、偏见和安全网的研究,开发了基于能力的课程,并调查了包括决策支持系统在内的数字创新。日本在临床推理掌握方面有着强大的传统,推进了理论框架、文化分析和基于人工智能的诊断支持,并主办了重大的区域会议。尽管取得了这些进展,但参与程度仍然不均衡,来自低收入和中等收入国家的数据有限。障碍包括资源限制、基础设施不发达以及不同的疾病负担,这些都对人工智能和其他创新的可转移性构成挑战。未来的进展需要在五个领域实现明确、可衡量的目标:研究、教育、实践改进、患者参与和政策。建议包括建立国家诊断错误数据库,在代表性不足的环境中促进多中心研究,扩大标准化课程,实施结构化审计和反馈系统,整合患者观点,以及将诊断安全指标纳入政策和报销框架。国际合作、对具体情况敏感的方法以及对新兴技术的强有力治理对于确保公平改进至关重要。通过利用共享学习,加强中低收入国家的能力,并使努力与全球政策框架保持一致,诊断安全运动可以从零散的举措演变为有凝聚力的、可持续的全球战略,目标是到2035年实现更安全、更可靠的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The global progress for improving diagnosis: what we've learned, what comes next.

Since the 2015 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, global awareness of diagnostic safety has grown substantially. Progress has been most visible in high-income countries, with emerging international research networks, conferences, and educational programs. Australia and New Zealand have advanced incident reporting systems, specialty-specific diagnostic safety tools, and educational resources. European initiatives have expanded research on clinical reasoning, bias, and safety-netting, developed competency-based curricula, and investigated digital innovations including decision support systems. Japan has built on a strong tradition of clinical reasoning mastery, advancing theoretical frameworks, cultural analysis, and AI-based diagnostic support, and hosting major regional conferences. Despite these gains, engagement remains uneven, with limited data from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Barriers include resource constraints, underdeveloped infrastructure, and differing disease burdens that challenge the transferability of AI and other innovations. Future progress requires clear, measurable objectives across five domains: research, education, practice improvement, patient engagement, and policy. Recommendations include establishing national diagnostic error databases, promoting multicenter research in underrepresented settings, expanding standardized curricula, implementing structured audit-and-feedback systems, integrating patient perspectives, and embedding diagnostic safety indicators in policy and reimbursement frameworks. International collaboration, context-sensitive methodologies, and robust governance for emerging technologies are critical to ensure equitable improvements. By leveraging shared learning, strengthening capacity in LMICs, and aligning efforts with global policy frameworks, the diagnostic safety movement can evolve from fragmented initiatives to a cohesive, sustainable worldwide strategy, aiming for safer, more reliable diagnosis by 2035.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnosis
Diagnosis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality.  Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信