Sarah Cayla, Lionel Karlin, Jerome Lambert, Anne Lazareth, Alexis Talbot, Mohamad Mohty, Florent Malard, Marie-Odile Petillon, Salomon Manier, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha, Denis Caillot, Ingrid Lafon, Xavier Leleu, Niels Moya, Bruno Royer, Jean Marc Schiano de Colella, Gabriel Brisou, Cyrille Touzeau, Aurore Perrot, Pierre Bories, Laure Vincent, Hanane Guedon, Olivier Decaux, Benoît Ferment, Roch Houot, Steven Le Gouill, Noemie Bigot, Thierry Facon, Jill Corre, Hervé Avet-Loiseau, Philippe Moreau, Bertrand Arnulf
{"title":"针对bcma的双特异性抗体在ide- cell早期复发后预后不佳:一项真实世界的法国研究","authors":"Sarah Cayla, Lionel Karlin, Jerome Lambert, Anne Lazareth, Alexis Talbot, Mohamad Mohty, Florent Malard, Marie-Odile Petillon, Salomon Manier, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha, Denis Caillot, Ingrid Lafon, Xavier Leleu, Niels Moya, Bruno Royer, Jean Marc Schiano de Colella, Gabriel Brisou, Cyrille Touzeau, Aurore Perrot, Pierre Bories, Laure Vincent, Hanane Guedon, Olivier Decaux, Benoît Ferment, Roch Houot, Steven Le Gouill, Noemie Bigot, Thierry Facon, Jill Corre, Hervé Avet-Loiseau, Philippe Moreau, Bertrand Arnulf","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), an adoptive chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy directed against B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), has demonstrated high response rates and improved survival in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. However, all patients eventually relapse, and data on salvage therapy outcomes remain limited. We conducted a national, real-world study of 154 patients relapsing after ide-cel, with a median time to progression of 6.0 months (interquartile range [IQR], 3.0-9.9). Salvage therapies included anti-BCMA bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) (n=79), non-BCMA BsAbs targeting GPRC5D or FcRH5 (n=12), combinations of immunomodulatory agent, proteasome inhibitor, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (n=40), and others (n=23). Median overall survival (OS) was 12.12 months [95%CI, 6.6 to not-reached], and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.48 months [95%CI, 2.6-6.37]. The overall response rate (ORR) (≥ partial response) was higher in patients treated with BsAbs (36%) than others (13%, p=0.002). Treatment with non-BCMA BsAbs resulted in significantly higher ORR (67% vs. 30%, p=0.018), OS (19.48 vs. 8.41 months, p=0.034) and PFS (9.2 vs. 3.81 months, p=0.035) compared to anti-BCMA BsAbs. Early relapse after ide-cel (≤6 months) was associated with worse outcomes (OS: 5.95 vs. 12.58 months, p=0.040), as was extramedullary disease (OS: 13.8 vs 6.28 months, p=0.033) and exposure to >3 prior lines of therapy. In summary, anti-BCMA BsAbs offered limited efficacy whereas non-BCMA BsAbs may offer a promising therapeutic approach following ide-cel early-relapse. These results underscore the potential benefits of diversifying targets in relapse post-ide-cel treatment strategies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04328298.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poor Outcomes with BCMA-targeting bispecific antibodies following early relapse from ide-cel: a real-world French study.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Cayla, Lionel Karlin, Jerome Lambert, Anne Lazareth, Alexis Talbot, Mohamad Mohty, Florent Malard, Marie-Odile Petillon, Salomon Manier, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha, Denis Caillot, Ingrid Lafon, Xavier Leleu, Niels Moya, Bruno Royer, Jean Marc Schiano de Colella, Gabriel Brisou, Cyrille Touzeau, Aurore Perrot, Pierre Bories, Laure Vincent, Hanane Guedon, Olivier Decaux, Benoît Ferment, Roch Houot, Steven Le Gouill, Noemie Bigot, Thierry Facon, Jill Corre, Hervé Avet-Loiseau, Philippe Moreau, Bertrand Arnulf\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), an adoptive chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy directed against B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), has demonstrated high response rates and improved survival in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. However, all patients eventually relapse, and data on salvage therapy outcomes remain limited. We conducted a national, real-world study of 154 patients relapsing after ide-cel, with a median time to progression of 6.0 months (interquartile range [IQR], 3.0-9.9). Salvage therapies included anti-BCMA bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) (n=79), non-BCMA BsAbs targeting GPRC5D or FcRH5 (n=12), combinations of immunomodulatory agent, proteasome inhibitor, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (n=40), and others (n=23). Median overall survival (OS) was 12.12 months [95%CI, 6.6 to not-reached], and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.48 months [95%CI, 2.6-6.37]. The overall response rate (ORR) (≥ partial response) was higher in patients treated with BsAbs (36%) than others (13%, p=0.002). Treatment with non-BCMA BsAbs resulted in significantly higher ORR (67% vs. 30%, p=0.018), OS (19.48 vs. 8.41 months, p=0.034) and PFS (9.2 vs. 3.81 months, p=0.035) compared to anti-BCMA BsAbs. Early relapse after ide-cel (≤6 months) was associated with worse outcomes (OS: 5.95 vs. 12.58 months, p=0.040), as was extramedullary disease (OS: 13.8 vs 6.28 months, p=0.033) and exposure to >3 prior lines of therapy. In summary, anti-BCMA BsAbs offered limited efficacy whereas non-BCMA BsAbs may offer a promising therapeutic approach following ide-cel early-relapse. These results underscore the potential benefits of diversifying targets in relapse post-ide-cel treatment strategies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04328298.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017597\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017597","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide- cell)是一种针对b细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)的过继性嵌合抗原受体(CAR) t细胞疗法,在复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中显示出高反应率和提高生存率。然而,所有患者最终都会复发,挽救性治疗结果的数据仍然有限。我们进行了一项全国性的、真实世界的研究,研究对象为154例idecel后复发的患者,中位进展时间为6.0个月(四分位数范围[IQR], 3.0-9.9)。挽救疗法包括抗bcma双特异性抗体(BsAbs) (n=79)、靶向GPRC5D或FcRH5的非bcma BsAbs (n=12)、免疫调节剂、蛋白酶体抑制剂和抗cd38单克隆抗体联合使用(n=40)等(n=23)。中位总生存期(OS)为12.12个月[95%CI, 6.6 -未达到],中位无进展生存期(PFS)为3.48个月[95%CI, 2.6-6.37]。接受bsab治疗的患者总缓解率(ORR)(≥部分缓解)(36%)高于其他患者(13%,p=0.002)。与抗bcma BsAbs相比,非bcma BsAbs治疗的ORR (67% vs 30%, p=0.018)、OS (19.48 vs 8.41个月,p=0.034)和PFS (9.2 vs 3.81个月,p=0.035)显著高于抗bcma BsAbs。ide-cel术后早期复发(≤6个月)与较差的预后相关(生存期:5.95 vs 12.58个月,p=0.040),髓外疾病(生存期:13.8 vs 6.28个月,p=0.033)和暴露于bbb30先前的治疗线也是如此。总之,抗bcma bsab提供有限的疗效,而非bcma bsab可能提供一种有希望的治疗方法,用于idecell早期复发。这些结果强调了在复发后细胞治疗策略中多样化靶点的潜在益处。ClinicalTrials.gov识别码NCT04328298。
Poor Outcomes with BCMA-targeting bispecific antibodies following early relapse from ide-cel: a real-world French study.
Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), an adoptive chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy directed against B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), has demonstrated high response rates and improved survival in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. However, all patients eventually relapse, and data on salvage therapy outcomes remain limited. We conducted a national, real-world study of 154 patients relapsing after ide-cel, with a median time to progression of 6.0 months (interquartile range [IQR], 3.0-9.9). Salvage therapies included anti-BCMA bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) (n=79), non-BCMA BsAbs targeting GPRC5D or FcRH5 (n=12), combinations of immunomodulatory agent, proteasome inhibitor, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (n=40), and others (n=23). Median overall survival (OS) was 12.12 months [95%CI, 6.6 to not-reached], and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.48 months [95%CI, 2.6-6.37]. The overall response rate (ORR) (≥ partial response) was higher in patients treated with BsAbs (36%) than others (13%, p=0.002). Treatment with non-BCMA BsAbs resulted in significantly higher ORR (67% vs. 30%, p=0.018), OS (19.48 vs. 8.41 months, p=0.034) and PFS (9.2 vs. 3.81 months, p=0.035) compared to anti-BCMA BsAbs. Early relapse after ide-cel (≤6 months) was associated with worse outcomes (OS: 5.95 vs. 12.58 months, p=0.040), as was extramedullary disease (OS: 13.8 vs 6.28 months, p=0.033) and exposure to >3 prior lines of therapy. In summary, anti-BCMA BsAbs offered limited efficacy whereas non-BCMA BsAbs may offer a promising therapeutic approach following ide-cel early-relapse. These results underscore the potential benefits of diversifying targets in relapse post-ide-cel treatment strategies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04328298.
期刊介绍:
Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016.
Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.