人道主义和脆弱环境中以人为本的产妇护理服务的范围审查。

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Wubshet D Negash, Asmamaw Atnafu, Robera Olana Fite, Kamalini Lokuge
{"title":"人道主义和脆弱环境中以人为本的产妇护理服务的范围审查。","authors":"Wubshet D Negash, Asmamaw Atnafu, Robera Olana Fite, Kamalini Lokuge","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Women who live in humanitarian settings are three times more likely to die than those who live in peaceful environments. Person-centred maternity care (PCMC) is a fundamental human right for every woman, yet it is often overlooked in humanitarian contexts. This scoping review aims to summarise person-centred maternity healthcare in fragile and humanitarian contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review of quantitative and/or qualitative approach was conducted to assess person-centred maternity care in humanitarian settings. Research that assessed dimensions of PCMC such as autonomy, dignity, privacy, communication, confidentiality and supportive care was included. Electronic database searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus and generic web searches (Google Scholar) were used to search for available evidence. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses criteria for scoping review statement. The data from the final selected articles were extracted into an Excel spreadsheet. Finally, we described the study characteristics and summarised the concept of person-centred care.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 889 articles were identified. After exclusion by title and abstract, 71 articles were eligible for full-text review, and finally 16 articles were eligible for data extraction. Our findings revealed low respect and supportive care, poor communication and autonomy, and breach of privacy. Resource constraints, protracted insecurity, cultural and language barriers were attributed to poor person-centred sexual and reproductive health. The review identified several implemented interventions, including training for healthcare providers, access to language translators, social and cultural support programmes, free healthcare services and community engagement initiatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are significantly more reports of negative experiences of maternity healthcare services than positive ones. Prioritising culturally appropriate approach, simulation-based training for healthcare providers on person-centred care, community engagement and the integration of PCMC domains into existing health services are essential to improve quality maternal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review of person-centred maternity care service in humanitarian and fragile settings.\",\"authors\":\"Wubshet D Negash, Asmamaw Atnafu, Robera Olana Fite, Kamalini Lokuge\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Women who live in humanitarian settings are three times more likely to die than those who live in peaceful environments. Person-centred maternity care (PCMC) is a fundamental human right for every woman, yet it is often overlooked in humanitarian contexts. This scoping review aims to summarise person-centred maternity healthcare in fragile and humanitarian contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review of quantitative and/or qualitative approach was conducted to assess person-centred maternity care in humanitarian settings. Research that assessed dimensions of PCMC such as autonomy, dignity, privacy, communication, confidentiality and supportive care was included. Electronic database searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus and generic web searches (Google Scholar) were used to search for available evidence. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses criteria for scoping review statement. The data from the final selected articles were extracted into an Excel spreadsheet. Finally, we described the study characteristics and summarised the concept of person-centred care.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 889 articles were identified. After exclusion by title and abstract, 71 articles were eligible for full-text review, and finally 16 articles were eligible for data extraction. Our findings revealed low respect and supportive care, poor communication and autonomy, and breach of privacy. Resource constraints, protracted insecurity, cultural and language barriers were attributed to poor person-centred sexual and reproductive health. The review identified several implemented interventions, including training for healthcare providers, access to language translators, social and cultural support programmes, free healthcare services and community engagement initiatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are significantly more reports of negative experiences of maternity healthcare services than positive ones. Prioritising culturally appropriate approach, simulation-based training for healthcare providers on person-centred care, community engagement and the integration of PCMC domains into existing health services are essential to improve quality maternal health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"10 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458718/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020696\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020696","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:生活在人道主义环境中的妇女死亡的可能性是生活在和平环境中的妇女的三倍。以人为本的产科护理(PCMC)是每个妇女的一项基本人权,但在人道主义背景下往往被忽视。这一范围审查的目的是总结在脆弱和人道主义情况下以人为本的产妇保健。方法:对定量和/或定性方法进行范围审查,以评估人道主义环境中以人为中心的产妇护理。研究评估了PCMC的维度,如自主性、尊严、隐私、沟通、保密性和支持性护理。电子数据库检索PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Scopus和通用网络检索(谷歌Scholar)来检索可获得的证据。我们使用系统评价的首选报告项目和荟萃分析标准来确定评价的范围。从最终选定的文章中提取数据到Excel电子表格中。最后,我们描述了研究的特点,并总结了以人为本的护理概念。结果:共鉴定出889篇。按标题和摘要排除后,有71篇文章符合全文审查条件,最后有16篇文章符合数据提取条件。我们的研究结果显示,缺乏尊重和支持性护理,沟通和自主性差,以及侵犯隐私。资源紧张、长期不安全、文化和语言障碍是造成以人为本的性健康和生殖健康状况不佳的原因。审查确定了若干已实施的干预措施,包括对保健提供者的培训、获得语言翻译、社会和文化支助方案、免费保健服务和社区参与倡议。结论:孕产妇消极体验报告明显多于积极体验报告。优先考虑文化上适当的做法、对保健提供者进行以人为本的护理模拟培训、社区参与以及将PCMC领域纳入现有保健服务,这些对提高孕产妇保健质量至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A scoping review of person-centred maternity care service in humanitarian and fragile settings.

Introduction: Women who live in humanitarian settings are three times more likely to die than those who live in peaceful environments. Person-centred maternity care (PCMC) is a fundamental human right for every woman, yet it is often overlooked in humanitarian contexts. This scoping review aims to summarise person-centred maternity healthcare in fragile and humanitarian contexts.

Methods: A scoping review of quantitative and/or qualitative approach was conducted to assess person-centred maternity care in humanitarian settings. Research that assessed dimensions of PCMC such as autonomy, dignity, privacy, communication, confidentiality and supportive care was included. Electronic database searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus and generic web searches (Google Scholar) were used to search for available evidence. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses criteria for scoping review statement. The data from the final selected articles were extracted into an Excel spreadsheet. Finally, we described the study characteristics and summarised the concept of person-centred care.

Result: A total of 889 articles were identified. After exclusion by title and abstract, 71 articles were eligible for full-text review, and finally 16 articles were eligible for data extraction. Our findings revealed low respect and supportive care, poor communication and autonomy, and breach of privacy. Resource constraints, protracted insecurity, cultural and language barriers were attributed to poor person-centred sexual and reproductive health. The review identified several implemented interventions, including training for healthcare providers, access to language translators, social and cultural support programmes, free healthcare services and community engagement initiatives.

Conclusion: There are significantly more reports of negative experiences of maternity healthcare services than positive ones. Prioritising culturally appropriate approach, simulation-based training for healthcare providers on person-centred care, community engagement and the integration of PCMC domains into existing health services are essential to improve quality maternal health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信