Ruta Zukauskaite, Jesper Grau Eriksen, Jørgen Johansen, Eva Samsøe, Morten Horsholt Kristensen, Lars Johnsen, Camilla Kjaer Lonkvist, Cai Grau, Jens Overgaard, Christian Rønn Hansen
{"title":"头颈癌患者高剂量临床肿瘤体积边缘变化后的晚期吞咽困难。","authors":"Ruta Zukauskaite, Jesper Grau Eriksen, Jørgen Johansen, Eva Samsøe, Morten Horsholt Kristensen, Lars Johnsen, Camilla Kjaer Lonkvist, Cai Grau, Jens Overgaard, Christian Rønn Hansen","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>One of the factors influencing disease control and toxicity risk after radiotherapy is selection of treatment volume margin. This study evaluates whether different gross tumour volume (GTV) to high-dose clinical target volume (CTV1) margins impact dysphagia in a cohort of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients. Patient/material and methods: Data of patients receiving primary IMRT-based radiotherapy for SCC for the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx at three treatment centres between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively collected. Treatment planning followed two DAHANCA guideline periods: pre-2013 (varying GTV-CTV1 margins), and post-2013 (isotropic 5 mm margin). Treatment plans were collected for 1,913 patients. GTV-CTV1 margins were calculated as median surface distance from GTV to CTV1. Dysphagia was graded using modified DAHANCA ordinal scale. For each patient, the highest score of dysphagia during 5-year follow-up period was chosen for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dysphagia data were available for 1,706 patients (89%). The median GTV-CTV1 margin was 9.0 mm in 2010-2012 and 4.7 mm in 2013-2015. The severity of dysphagia was more pronounced in patients treated during 2010-2012 (p = 0.003). Predictors of grade ≥ 2 dysphagia included larger GTV (odds ratio [OR]: 1.7; p < 0.001), larger GTV-CTV1 margin (odds ratio [OR] of 1.3 per cm; p = 0.04), and tumour localisation other than oropharyngeal p16+carcinomas (p = 0.002). Male sex, non/previous smoking status, and application of chemotherapy were associated with less severe dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Tumour volume and GTV-CTV1 margin are dominant geometric parameters influencing dysphagia risk following curative radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"1262-1268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late dysphagia after changes in high-dose clinical tumour volume margin for head and neck cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ruta Zukauskaite, Jesper Grau Eriksen, Jørgen Johansen, Eva Samsøe, Morten Horsholt Kristensen, Lars Johnsen, Camilla Kjaer Lonkvist, Cai Grau, Jens Overgaard, Christian Rønn Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>One of the factors influencing disease control and toxicity risk after radiotherapy is selection of treatment volume margin. This study evaluates whether different gross tumour volume (GTV) to high-dose clinical target volume (CTV1) margins impact dysphagia in a cohort of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients. Patient/material and methods: Data of patients receiving primary IMRT-based radiotherapy for SCC for the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx at three treatment centres between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively collected. Treatment planning followed two DAHANCA guideline periods: pre-2013 (varying GTV-CTV1 margins), and post-2013 (isotropic 5 mm margin). Treatment plans were collected for 1,913 patients. GTV-CTV1 margins were calculated as median surface distance from GTV to CTV1. Dysphagia was graded using modified DAHANCA ordinal scale. For each patient, the highest score of dysphagia during 5-year follow-up period was chosen for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dysphagia data were available for 1,706 patients (89%). The median GTV-CTV1 margin was 9.0 mm in 2010-2012 and 4.7 mm in 2013-2015. The severity of dysphagia was more pronounced in patients treated during 2010-2012 (p = 0.003). Predictors of grade ≥ 2 dysphagia included larger GTV (odds ratio [OR]: 1.7; p < 0.001), larger GTV-CTV1 margin (odds ratio [OR] of 1.3 per cm; p = 0.04), and tumour localisation other than oropharyngeal p16+carcinomas (p = 0.002). Male sex, non/previous smoking status, and application of chemotherapy were associated with less severe dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Tumour volume and GTV-CTV1 margin are dominant geometric parameters influencing dysphagia risk following curative radiotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"1262-1268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459203/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43924\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43924","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:影响放射治疗后疾病控制和毒性风险的因素之一是治疗容积裕度的选择。本研究评估了不同肿瘤体积(GTV)和高剂量临床靶体积(CTV1)边缘对头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCC)患者吞咽困难的影响。患者/材料和方法:回顾性收集2010年至2015年在三个治疗中心接受口咽、下咽和喉部SCC原发性imrt放疗的患者的数据。治疗计划遵循两个DAHANCA指南期:2013年前(不同的GTV-CTV1边缘)和2013年后(各向同性5毫米边缘)。收集了1913例患者的治疗方案。GTV-CTV1边界计算为GTV到CTV1的中位数表面距离。使用改进的DAHANCA顺序量表对吞咽困难进行分级。每位患者在5年随访期间选择最高的吞咽困难评分进行分析。结果:1706例(89%)患者有吞咽困难的资料。2010-2012年GTV-CTV1中位切距为9.0 mm, 2013-2015年为4.7 mm。吞咽困难的严重程度在2010-2012年期间更为明显(p = 0.003)。≥2级吞咽困难的预测因素包括较大的GTV(比值比[OR]: 1.7; p < 0.001),较大的GTV- ctv1边缘(比值比[OR]为1.3 / cm; p = 0.04),以及除口咽p16+癌以外的肿瘤定位(p = 0.002)。男性、无吸烟史和化疗与较轻的吞咽困难相关。结论:肿瘤体积和GTV-CTV1切缘是影响治疗性放疗后吞咽困难风险的主要几何参数。
Late dysphagia after changes in high-dose clinical tumour volume margin for head and neck cancer patients.
Background and purpose: One of the factors influencing disease control and toxicity risk after radiotherapy is selection of treatment volume margin. This study evaluates whether different gross tumour volume (GTV) to high-dose clinical target volume (CTV1) margins impact dysphagia in a cohort of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients. Patient/material and methods: Data of patients receiving primary IMRT-based radiotherapy for SCC for the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx at three treatment centres between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively collected. Treatment planning followed two DAHANCA guideline periods: pre-2013 (varying GTV-CTV1 margins), and post-2013 (isotropic 5 mm margin). Treatment plans were collected for 1,913 patients. GTV-CTV1 margins were calculated as median surface distance from GTV to CTV1. Dysphagia was graded using modified DAHANCA ordinal scale. For each patient, the highest score of dysphagia during 5-year follow-up period was chosen for analysis.
Results: Dysphagia data were available for 1,706 patients (89%). The median GTV-CTV1 margin was 9.0 mm in 2010-2012 and 4.7 mm in 2013-2015. The severity of dysphagia was more pronounced in patients treated during 2010-2012 (p = 0.003). Predictors of grade ≥ 2 dysphagia included larger GTV (odds ratio [OR]: 1.7; p < 0.001), larger GTV-CTV1 margin (odds ratio [OR] of 1.3 per cm; p = 0.04), and tumour localisation other than oropharyngeal p16+carcinomas (p = 0.002). Male sex, non/previous smoking status, and application of chemotherapy were associated with less severe dysphagia.
Interpretation: Tumour volume and GTV-CTV1 margin are dominant geometric parameters influencing dysphagia risk following curative radiotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.