Chloe P. Castanon, Denise Hernandez, Akshay N. Khetrapal, Rosalee S. Hellberg
{"title":"基于pcr的金枪鱼罐头品种检测方法比较。","authors":"Chloe P. Castanon, Denise Hernandez, Akshay N. Khetrapal, Rosalee S. Hellberg","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Canned tuna is susceptible to mislabeling due to its high consumer demand, complex global supply chains, and range of prices. DNA barcoding of a short fragment of the mitochondrial control region (CR), termed the CR mini-barcode, has been established as an effective method for tuna species identification. However, the high level of DNA degradation in canned tuna products reduces the effectiveness of this method. Therefore, this study aimed to compare CR mini-barcoding to targeted (i.e., real-time or multiplex) PCR-based methods to determine the most effective approach for canned tuna species identification. DNA was extracted in duplicate from 24 canned tuna products labeled as albacore, skipjack, yellowfin, and light tuna. Each sample was analyzed with CR mini-barcoding, real-time PCR, and multiplex PCR. The top-performing targeted method also underwent sensitivity testing using binary species mixtures. Real-time PCR showed the highest species identification rate, with 100% of products detected, followed by CR mini-barcoding (33%) and multiplex PCR (29%). Real-time PCR also showed excellent sensitivity, detecting 0.1%–1% of the target species in fresh and heat-treated binary species mixtures. Multiplex PCR and real-time PCR showed similar effectiveness in terms of cost and time, with a price of US$6 per sample and a total time of 3–6 h when testing all targeted species. Although CR mini-barcoding required greater costs and time, it allowed for sequencing-based detection of a range of species in the products. In conclusion, a combination of real-time PCR and CR mini-barcoding is recommended to allow for rapid screening of target species along with sequencing-based confirmation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practical Applications</h3>\n \n <p>This research provides a practical recommendation regarding the use of genetic methods for detecting species in canned tuna. Implementation of the recommended methodology is expected to enhance consumer protection and help regulatory agencies enforce accurate labeling.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70424","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of PCR-Based Methods for the Detection of Canned Tuna Species\",\"authors\":\"Chloe P. Castanon, Denise Hernandez, Akshay N. Khetrapal, Rosalee S. Hellberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1750-3841.70424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Canned tuna is susceptible to mislabeling due to its high consumer demand, complex global supply chains, and range of prices. DNA barcoding of a short fragment of the mitochondrial control region (CR), termed the CR mini-barcode, has been established as an effective method for tuna species identification. However, the high level of DNA degradation in canned tuna products reduces the effectiveness of this method. Therefore, this study aimed to compare CR mini-barcoding to targeted (i.e., real-time or multiplex) PCR-based methods to determine the most effective approach for canned tuna species identification. DNA was extracted in duplicate from 24 canned tuna products labeled as albacore, skipjack, yellowfin, and light tuna. Each sample was analyzed with CR mini-barcoding, real-time PCR, and multiplex PCR. The top-performing targeted method also underwent sensitivity testing using binary species mixtures. Real-time PCR showed the highest species identification rate, with 100% of products detected, followed by CR mini-barcoding (33%) and multiplex PCR (29%). Real-time PCR also showed excellent sensitivity, detecting 0.1%–1% of the target species in fresh and heat-treated binary species mixtures. Multiplex PCR and real-time PCR showed similar effectiveness in terms of cost and time, with a price of US$6 per sample and a total time of 3–6 h when testing all targeted species. Although CR mini-barcoding required greater costs and time, it allowed for sequencing-based detection of a range of species in the products. In conclusion, a combination of real-time PCR and CR mini-barcoding is recommended to allow for rapid screening of target species along with sequencing-based confirmation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Practical Applications</h3>\\n \\n <p>This research provides a practical recommendation regarding the use of genetic methods for detecting species in canned tuna. Implementation of the recommended methodology is expected to enhance consumer protection and help regulatory agencies enforce accurate labeling.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\"90 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70424\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70424\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70424","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of PCR-Based Methods for the Detection of Canned Tuna Species
Canned tuna is susceptible to mislabeling due to its high consumer demand, complex global supply chains, and range of prices. DNA barcoding of a short fragment of the mitochondrial control region (CR), termed the CR mini-barcode, has been established as an effective method for tuna species identification. However, the high level of DNA degradation in canned tuna products reduces the effectiveness of this method. Therefore, this study aimed to compare CR mini-barcoding to targeted (i.e., real-time or multiplex) PCR-based methods to determine the most effective approach for canned tuna species identification. DNA was extracted in duplicate from 24 canned tuna products labeled as albacore, skipjack, yellowfin, and light tuna. Each sample was analyzed with CR mini-barcoding, real-time PCR, and multiplex PCR. The top-performing targeted method also underwent sensitivity testing using binary species mixtures. Real-time PCR showed the highest species identification rate, with 100% of products detected, followed by CR mini-barcoding (33%) and multiplex PCR (29%). Real-time PCR also showed excellent sensitivity, detecting 0.1%–1% of the target species in fresh and heat-treated binary species mixtures. Multiplex PCR and real-time PCR showed similar effectiveness in terms of cost and time, with a price of US$6 per sample and a total time of 3–6 h when testing all targeted species. Although CR mini-barcoding required greater costs and time, it allowed for sequencing-based detection of a range of species in the products. In conclusion, a combination of real-time PCR and CR mini-barcoding is recommended to allow for rapid screening of target species along with sequencing-based confirmation.
Practical Applications
This research provides a practical recommendation regarding the use of genetic methods for detecting species in canned tuna. Implementation of the recommended methodology is expected to enhance consumer protection and help regulatory agencies enforce accurate labeling.
期刊介绍:
The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science.
The range of topics covered in the journal include:
-Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science
-New Horizons in Food Research
-Integrated Food Science
-Food Chemistry
-Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology
-Food Microbiology and Safety
-Sensory and Consumer Sciences
-Health, Nutrition, and Food
-Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety
The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.