{"title":"儿童博物馆的理论化:CHAT、识字和以家庭为中心的儿童博物馆","authors":"Tarah Connolly","doi":"10.1177/14687984251380967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children’s museums are delightful, whimsical, and joyful places, but they are undertheorized. This limits our capacity to fully leverage children’s museums as spaces for expansive visions of literacy learning. It also limits our examination of the potential harms enacted by children’s museums. To theorize the children’s museum, I take Ash’s framework for reculturing museums as a starting point. Using Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) plus critiques of neoliberalism and deficit logics, I argue that children’s museums are complex activity systems that aim to negotiate the literacy-related objectives of families, schools, and other sites of learning. Neoliberal ideologies and deficit logics inform these negotiations. I analyze two contradictions: (1) between the mediational means of play and the objective of learning, and (2) between the rules/norms of children’s museums and the diverse communities they serve. To close, I reflect on potential pathways for reculturing children’s museums toward more justice-oriented practices.","PeriodicalId":47033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theorizing the Children’s Museum: CHAT, literacies, and the family-centered children’s museum\",\"authors\":\"Tarah Connolly\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14687984251380967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Children’s museums are delightful, whimsical, and joyful places, but they are undertheorized. This limits our capacity to fully leverage children’s museums as spaces for expansive visions of literacy learning. It also limits our examination of the potential harms enacted by children’s museums. To theorize the children’s museum, I take Ash’s framework for reculturing museums as a starting point. Using Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) plus critiques of neoliberalism and deficit logics, I argue that children’s museums are complex activity systems that aim to negotiate the literacy-related objectives of families, schools, and other sites of learning. Neoliberal ideologies and deficit logics inform these negotiations. I analyze two contradictions: (1) between the mediational means of play and the objective of learning, and (2) between the rules/norms of children’s museums and the diverse communities they serve. To close, I reflect on potential pathways for reculturing children’s museums toward more justice-oriented practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984251380967\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984251380967","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Theorizing the Children’s Museum: CHAT, literacies, and the family-centered children’s museum
Children’s museums are delightful, whimsical, and joyful places, but they are undertheorized. This limits our capacity to fully leverage children’s museums as spaces for expansive visions of literacy learning. It also limits our examination of the potential harms enacted by children’s museums. To theorize the children’s museum, I take Ash’s framework for reculturing museums as a starting point. Using Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) plus critiques of neoliberalism and deficit logics, I argue that children’s museums are complex activity systems that aim to negotiate the literacy-related objectives of families, schools, and other sites of learning. Neoliberal ideologies and deficit logics inform these negotiations. I analyze two contradictions: (1) between the mediational means of play and the objective of learning, and (2) between the rules/norms of children’s museums and the diverse communities they serve. To close, I reflect on potential pathways for reculturing children’s museums toward more justice-oriented practices.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy is a fully peer-reviewed international journal. Since its foundation in 2001 JECL has rapidly become a distinctive, leading voice in research in early childhood literacy, with a multinational range of contributors and readership. The main emphasis in the journal is on papers researching issues related to the nature, function and use of literacy in early childhood. This includes the history, development, use, learning and teaching of literacy, as well as policy and strategy. Research papers may address theoretical, methodological, strategic or applied aspects of early childhood literacy and could be reviews of research issues. JECL is both a forum for debate about the topic of early childhood literacy and a resource for those working in the field. Literacy is broadly defined; JECL focuses on the 0-8 age range. Our prime interest in empirical work is those studies that are situated in authentic or naturalistic settings; this differentiates the journal from others in the area. JECL, therefore, tends to favour qualitative work but is also open to research employing quantitative methods. The journal is multi-disciplinary. We welcome submissions from diverse disciplinary backgrounds including: education, cultural psychology, literacy studies, sociology, anthropology, historical and cultural studies, applied linguistics and semiotics.