重症监护室中央置管的皮下锚定固定:一项试点研究。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Francesco Tomeo, Italo Calamai, Marco Luchini, Irene Mori, Andrea Giannini, Rosario Spina
{"title":"重症监护室中央置管的皮下锚定固定:一项试点研究。","authors":"Francesco Tomeo, Italo Calamai, Marco Luchini, Irene Mori, Andrea Giannini, Rosario Spina","doi":"10.1177/11297298251369060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) are critical devices in intensive care settings, where patients often require life-saving therapies. However, the stability of these devices is essential to avoid dislodgement, migration, and therapy interruptions. Adhesive sutureless securements devices are challenging in terms of dislodgment rates, while sutures must be avoided. SAS (Subcutaneous anchored Securement Device) is widely used in Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) to reduce dislodgement rate and improve cost effectiveness, but its use in ICU is still limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the incidence of CICC dislodgement using SAS in a second-level hospital ICU and assess whether its use increases catheter dwell time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, observational, single-center study involving 100 ICU patients at high risk of CICC dislodgement was conducted. A total of 126 CICCs were placed and secured with SAS (SecurAcath), and outcomes were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dislodgement rate for SAS-CICCs was 4% (1.93 dislodgements per 1000 catheter days). The average catheter dwell time was 17.25 days, longer than adhesive securement devices (12.3 days). No device failures, local infections, or exit-site complications were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAS effectively stabilizes CICCs, reduces dislodgement rates, and extends catheter dwell time in high-risk ICU patients, aligning with 2024 GAVeCeLT guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251369060"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subcutaneous anchored securement of centrally inserted central catheter in intensive care unit: A pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Tomeo, Italo Calamai, Marco Luchini, Irene Mori, Andrea Giannini, Rosario Spina\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298251369060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) are critical devices in intensive care settings, where patients often require life-saving therapies. However, the stability of these devices is essential to avoid dislodgement, migration, and therapy interruptions. Adhesive sutureless securements devices are challenging in terms of dislodgment rates, while sutures must be avoided. SAS (Subcutaneous anchored Securement Device) is widely used in Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) to reduce dislodgement rate and improve cost effectiveness, but its use in ICU is still limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the incidence of CICC dislodgement using SAS in a second-level hospital ICU and assess whether its use increases catheter dwell time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, observational, single-center study involving 100 ICU patients at high risk of CICC dislodgement was conducted. A total of 126 CICCs were placed and secured with SAS (SecurAcath), and outcomes were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dislodgement rate for SAS-CICCs was 4% (1.93 dislodgements per 1000 catheter days). The average catheter dwell time was 17.25 days, longer than adhesive securement devices (12.3 days). No device failures, local infections, or exit-site complications were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAS effectively stabilizes CICCs, reduces dislodgement rates, and extends catheter dwell time in high-risk ICU patients, aligning with 2024 GAVeCeLT guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11297298251369060\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251369060\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251369060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中央插入中心导管(CICCs)是重症监护环境中的关键设备,患者通常需要挽救生命的治疗。然而,这些装置的稳定性对于避免移位、迁移和治疗中断至关重要。粘接无缝线固定装置在脱位率方面具有挑战性,同时必须避免缝线。SAS (Subcutaneous anchor secure Device,皮下锚定固定装置)广泛应用于外周插入中心导管(PICC),以减少脱位率,提高成本效益,但在ICU的应用仍然有限。目的:评价SAS在某二级医院ICU中ccic脱位的发生率,并评价其使用是否延长了导管停留时间。方法:采用前瞻性、观察性、单中心研究,纳入100例高危ICU患者。采用SAS (SecurAcath)对126例ccic进行放置和保护,并对结果进行监测。结果:SAS-CICCs的脱位率为4%(每1000天有1.93例脱位)。导管平均停留时间为17.25天,比粘接固定装置(12.3天)长。没有器械故障、局部感染或退出部位并发症的报道。结论:SAS可有效稳定高危ICU患者的CICCs,降低脱位率,延长导管停留时间,符合2024年GAVeCeLT指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subcutaneous anchored securement of centrally inserted central catheter in intensive care unit: A pilot study.

Background: Centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) are critical devices in intensive care settings, where patients often require life-saving therapies. However, the stability of these devices is essential to avoid dislodgement, migration, and therapy interruptions. Adhesive sutureless securements devices are challenging in terms of dislodgment rates, while sutures must be avoided. SAS (Subcutaneous anchored Securement Device) is widely used in Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) to reduce dislodgement rate and improve cost effectiveness, but its use in ICU is still limited.

Objective: To evaluate the incidence of CICC dislodgement using SAS in a second-level hospital ICU and assess whether its use increases catheter dwell time.

Methods: A prospective, observational, single-center study involving 100 ICU patients at high risk of CICC dislodgement was conducted. A total of 126 CICCs were placed and secured with SAS (SecurAcath), and outcomes were monitored.

Results: The dislodgement rate for SAS-CICCs was 4% (1.93 dislodgements per 1000 catheter days). The average catheter dwell time was 17.25 days, longer than adhesive securement devices (12.3 days). No device failures, local infections, or exit-site complications were reported.

Conclusion: SAS effectively stabilizes CICCs, reduces dislodgement rates, and extends catheter dwell time in high-risk ICU patients, aligning with 2024 GAVeCeLT guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信