全科医生参与住院病人医疗康复在德国:范围审查。

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Malte Klemmt, Katharina van Baal, Maria Bonin, Stephanie Stiel
{"title":"全科医生参与住院病人医疗康复在德国:范围审查。","authors":"Malte Klemmt, Katharina van Baal, Maria Bonin, Stephanie Stiel","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-03007-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The German rehabilitation system has some peculiar features, such as the predominance of inpatient medical rehabilitation. Most patients receive inpatient rehabilitation due to chronic illnesses like chronic backpain or psychosomatic diseases. General practitioners play a special role in the German healthcare system as they are often the first point of contact for health issues. The study aims to provide an overview of the involvement of general practitioners in inpatient medical rehabilitation in Germany as well as identifying barriers and facilitators. By doing this, a basis for optimizing general practitioners' involvement can be generated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted to ascertain the current state of scientific knowledge, employing the methodological approach of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The search was carried out between February and March 2024. Eight databases were screened: PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, PubPsych, EBSCOhost, BeLit, LIVIVO, ProQuest, and German National Library. Publications in German and English in the publication period from 1980 to February 2024 were sought. A thematic analysis was conducted to evaluate the included publications. The research process and generation of findings were recorded utilizing the PRISMA-ScR checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search resulted in a total of 2231 records, of which 102 were screened on a full text level. Fifty-four publications were included in the review. Following the thematic analysis, fourteen themes were identified and assigned to four topic areas. In the area of access, general practitioners take on a gatekeeper function (addressed by 10 publications) among other things. In follow-up care, there is involvement in prescription (5 publications), like referral to outpatient medical specialists. Barriers to involvement relate, for example, to a lack of knowledge on the part of general practitioners (10 publications) and facilitators include education and training (10 publications).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results confirm the important role of general practitioners in providing access to inpatient medical rehabilitation in Germany and follow-up care. However, various barriers for general practitioners' involvement were revealed. In order to maintain and optimize the involvement, further scientific research and efforts based on this in practice are necessary, involving relevant stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General practitioners' involvement in inpatient medical rehabilitation in Germany: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Malte Klemmt, Katharina van Baal, Maria Bonin, Stephanie Stiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-025-03007-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The German rehabilitation system has some peculiar features, such as the predominance of inpatient medical rehabilitation. Most patients receive inpatient rehabilitation due to chronic illnesses like chronic backpain or psychosomatic diseases. General practitioners play a special role in the German healthcare system as they are often the first point of contact for health issues. The study aims to provide an overview of the involvement of general practitioners in inpatient medical rehabilitation in Germany as well as identifying barriers and facilitators. By doing this, a basis for optimizing general practitioners' involvement can be generated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted to ascertain the current state of scientific knowledge, employing the methodological approach of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The search was carried out between February and March 2024. Eight databases were screened: PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, PubPsych, EBSCOhost, BeLit, LIVIVO, ProQuest, and German National Library. Publications in German and English in the publication period from 1980 to February 2024 were sought. A thematic analysis was conducted to evaluate the included publications. The research process and generation of findings were recorded utilizing the PRISMA-ScR checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search resulted in a total of 2231 records, of which 102 were screened on a full text level. Fifty-four publications were included in the review. Following the thematic analysis, fourteen themes were identified and assigned to four topic areas. In the area of access, general practitioners take on a gatekeeper function (addressed by 10 publications) among other things. In follow-up care, there is involvement in prescription (5 publications), like referral to outpatient medical specialists. Barriers to involvement relate, for example, to a lack of knowledge on the part of general practitioners (10 publications) and facilitators include education and training (10 publications).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results confirm the important role of general practitioners in providing access to inpatient medical rehabilitation in Germany and follow-up care. However, various barriers for general practitioners' involvement were revealed. In order to maintain and optimize the involvement, further scientific research and efforts based on this in practice are necessary, involving relevant stakeholders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC primary care\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445031/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-03007-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-03007-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:德国康复体系有一些独特的特点,如住院医疗康复占主导地位。大多数患者因慢性背痛或心身疾病等慢性疾病而接受住院康复。全科医生在德国医疗保健系统中扮演着特殊的角色,因为他们通常是健康问题的第一个接触点。该研究旨在概述全科医生在德国住院医疗康复中的参与情况,并确定障碍和促进因素。通过这样做,可以产生优化全科医生参与的基础。方法:采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法学方法,进行范围审查,以确定科学知识的现状。搜寻工作于2024年2月至3月进行。筛选了8个数据库:PubMed、Web of Science Core Collection、PubPsych、EBSCOhost、BeLit、LIVIVO、ProQuest和德国国家图书馆。在1980年至2024年2月的出版期间寻求德文和英文出版物。对列入的出版物进行了专题分析评价。使用PRISMA-ScR检查表记录研究过程和结果的生成。结果:共检索到2231条记录,其中102条被全文筛选。该综述包括54份出版物。在专题分析之后,确定了14个专题,并将其分配到4个专题领域。在获取领域,全科医生除其他外,还承担着看门人的职能(由10份出版物解决)。在后续护理中,有参与处方(5出版物),如转介给门诊医学专家。例如,妨碍参与的障碍与全科医生缺乏知识有关(10篇出版物),促进因素包括教育和培训(10篇出版物)。结论:结果证实了全科医生在提供德国住院医疗康复和随访护理方面的重要作用。然而,全科医生参与的各种障碍被揭示出来。为了保持和优化参与性,有必要在实践中进一步开展相关利益相关者的科学研究和努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

General practitioners' involvement in inpatient medical rehabilitation in Germany: a scoping review.

General practitioners' involvement in inpatient medical rehabilitation in Germany: a scoping review.

General practitioners' involvement in inpatient medical rehabilitation in Germany: a scoping review.

Background: The German rehabilitation system has some peculiar features, such as the predominance of inpatient medical rehabilitation. Most patients receive inpatient rehabilitation due to chronic illnesses like chronic backpain or psychosomatic diseases. General practitioners play a special role in the German healthcare system as they are often the first point of contact for health issues. The study aims to provide an overview of the involvement of general practitioners in inpatient medical rehabilitation in Germany as well as identifying barriers and facilitators. By doing this, a basis for optimizing general practitioners' involvement can be generated.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted to ascertain the current state of scientific knowledge, employing the methodological approach of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The search was carried out between February and March 2024. Eight databases were screened: PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, PubPsych, EBSCOhost, BeLit, LIVIVO, ProQuest, and German National Library. Publications in German and English in the publication period from 1980 to February 2024 were sought. A thematic analysis was conducted to evaluate the included publications. The research process and generation of findings were recorded utilizing the PRISMA-ScR checklist.

Results: The search resulted in a total of 2231 records, of which 102 were screened on a full text level. Fifty-four publications were included in the review. Following the thematic analysis, fourteen themes were identified and assigned to four topic areas. In the area of access, general practitioners take on a gatekeeper function (addressed by 10 publications) among other things. In follow-up care, there is involvement in prescription (5 publications), like referral to outpatient medical specialists. Barriers to involvement relate, for example, to a lack of knowledge on the part of general practitioners (10 publications) and facilitators include education and training (10 publications).

Conclusions: The results confirm the important role of general practitioners in providing access to inpatient medical rehabilitation in Germany and follow-up care. However, various barriers for general practitioners' involvement were revealed. In order to maintain and optimize the involvement, further scientific research and efforts based on this in practice are necessary, involving relevant stakeholders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信