通过临床文本笔记预测中风事件后的功能结果:传统机器学习和深度学习方法的比较研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-17 DOI:10.1177/14604582251381194
Yu-Hsiang Su, Chih-Fong Tsai
{"title":"通过临床文本笔记预测中风事件后的功能结果:传统机器学习和深度学习方法的比较研究。","authors":"Yu-Hsiang Su, Chih-Fong Tsai","doi":"10.1177/14604582251381194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Accurately predicting functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke is essential for healthcare institutions to optimize staffing and resource allocation. Although text mining has been applied to build such models, most prior studies emphasize traditional machine learning, with limited comparison to deep learning methods. <b>Methods:</b> Clinical text notes were collected from a Taiwanese hospital to build the experimental dataset. Four textual feature representation techniques were evaluated: bag-of-words (BOW), term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), embeddings from language models (ELMo), and bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT). Correspondingly, four predictive models were tested: k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), convolutional neural network (CNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM). <b>Results:</b> The best performance was obtained using BOW features with an SVM classifier. Feature fusion strategies, combining representations such as BOW + TF-IDF and BOW + BERT, also yielded strong performance. Notably, the BOW + TF-IDF combination with SVM achieved the lowest type I error, effectively minimizing the misclassification of patients with poor outcomes. <b>Conclusion:</b> Traditional machine learning methods outperformed deep learning models in this study. Among all combinations, BOW + TF-IDF features with SVM provided the most accurate predictions and lowest risk of false positives in stroke outcome prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"31 3","pages":"14604582251381194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting functional outcomes after a stroke event by clinical text notes: A comparative study of traditional machine learning and deep learning methods.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Hsiang Su, Chih-Fong Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14604582251381194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Accurately predicting functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke is essential for healthcare institutions to optimize staffing and resource allocation. Although text mining has been applied to build such models, most prior studies emphasize traditional machine learning, with limited comparison to deep learning methods. <b>Methods:</b> Clinical text notes were collected from a Taiwanese hospital to build the experimental dataset. Four textual feature representation techniques were evaluated: bag-of-words (BOW), term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), embeddings from language models (ELMo), and bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT). Correspondingly, four predictive models were tested: k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), convolutional neural network (CNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM). <b>Results:</b> The best performance was obtained using BOW features with an SVM classifier. Feature fusion strategies, combining representations such as BOW + TF-IDF and BOW + BERT, also yielded strong performance. Notably, the BOW + TF-IDF combination with SVM achieved the lowest type I error, effectively minimizing the misclassification of patients with poor outcomes. <b>Conclusion:</b> Traditional machine learning methods outperformed deep learning models in this study. Among all combinations, BOW + TF-IDF features with SVM provided the most accurate predictions and lowest risk of false positives in stroke outcome prediction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"14604582251381194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251381194\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251381194","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:准确预测急性缺血性脑卒中后的功能结局对医疗机构优化人员配置和资源配置至关重要。虽然文本挖掘已经被用于构建这样的模型,但大多数先前的研究强调传统的机器学习,与深度学习方法的比较有限。方法:收集台湾某医院临床文献笔记,构建实验数据集。评估了四种文本特征表示技术:词袋(BOW)、词频逆文档频率(TF-IDF)、语言模型嵌入(ELMo)和转换器双向编码器表示(BERT)。相应地,我们测试了四种预测模型:k-最近邻(KNN)、支持向量机(SVM)、卷积神经网络(CNN)和长短期记忆(LSTM)。结果:将BOW特征与SVM分类器结合使用可获得最佳性能。结合BOW + TF-IDF和BOW + BERT等表征的特征融合策略也取得了较好的效果。值得注意的是,BOW + TF-IDF联合SVM获得了最低的I型误差,有效地减少了不良预后患者的误分。结论:在本研究中,传统机器学习方法优于深度学习模型。在所有组合中,BOW + TF-IDF特征结合SVM预测脑卒中结局最准确,假阳性风险最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting functional outcomes after a stroke event by clinical text notes: A comparative study of traditional machine learning and deep learning methods.

Objective: Accurately predicting functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke is essential for healthcare institutions to optimize staffing and resource allocation. Although text mining has been applied to build such models, most prior studies emphasize traditional machine learning, with limited comparison to deep learning methods. Methods: Clinical text notes were collected from a Taiwanese hospital to build the experimental dataset. Four textual feature representation techniques were evaluated: bag-of-words (BOW), term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), embeddings from language models (ELMo), and bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT). Correspondingly, four predictive models were tested: k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), convolutional neural network (CNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM). Results: The best performance was obtained using BOW features with an SVM classifier. Feature fusion strategies, combining representations such as BOW + TF-IDF and BOW + BERT, also yielded strong performance. Notably, the BOW + TF-IDF combination with SVM achieved the lowest type I error, effectively minimizing the misclassification of patients with poor outcomes. Conclusion: Traditional machine learning methods outperformed deep learning models in this study. Among all combinations, BOW + TF-IDF features with SVM provided the most accurate predictions and lowest risk of false positives in stroke outcome prediction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信