David E Anekwe, Sherry Katz, Lynn Gillespie, André Bussières, Arianne Antonitti, Laurence Bélanger, Federico D'Agnillo, Alex Sun, Jadranka Spahija
{"title":"物理治疗重症监护学习需求评估工具主题领域的识别、选择和验证:一种混合方法方法。","authors":"David E Anekwe, Sherry Katz, Lynn Gillespie, André Bussières, Arianne Antonitti, Laurence Bélanger, Federico D'Agnillo, Alex Sun, Jadranka Spahija","doi":"10.3138/ptc-2022-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To identify, select, and validate topic areas for a physical therapy critical care learning needs assessment tool. <b><i>Method:</i></b> A scoping review was used to identify knowledge/skill areas relevant to physiotherapy intensive care unit (ICU) practice and develop a survey questionnaire. Physiotherapists rated the relevance of each survey item for practice in the ICU, as well as their knowledge about each item. Descriptive statistics summarized the responses. A statistically based algorithm was used to identify highly relevant items where the level of knowledge/skill was relatively low. Experienced physiotherapists were consulted to agree on the items that should be included. The process was repeated in three additional ICUs to validate the selected items. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 238 items, identified from 40 articles, were included in the survey and rated by physiotherapists. From survey results, a statistical-based algorithm identified 113 important topic areas for inclusion (47.48%). A modified triage technique was used to further reduce the selected areas to 90 topics. The validation process further refined the topics to 94 topics along with 13 additional site-specific topic areas. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Topics identified in this study will inform the development of a physical therapy critical care learning needs assessment tool. Our survey tool and methodological approach could guide the development of hospital-specific learning needs assessment tools in other clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54606,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada","volume":"77 1","pages":"122-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Identification, Selection, and Validation of Topic Areas for a Physical Therapy Critical Care Learning Needs Assessment Tool: A Mixed Method Approach.\",\"authors\":\"David E Anekwe, Sherry Katz, Lynn Gillespie, André Bussières, Arianne Antonitti, Laurence Bélanger, Federico D'Agnillo, Alex Sun, Jadranka Spahija\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/ptc-2022-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To identify, select, and validate topic areas for a physical therapy critical care learning needs assessment tool. <b><i>Method:</i></b> A scoping review was used to identify knowledge/skill areas relevant to physiotherapy intensive care unit (ICU) practice and develop a survey questionnaire. Physiotherapists rated the relevance of each survey item for practice in the ICU, as well as their knowledge about each item. Descriptive statistics summarized the responses. A statistically based algorithm was used to identify highly relevant items where the level of knowledge/skill was relatively low. Experienced physiotherapists were consulted to agree on the items that should be included. The process was repeated in three additional ICUs to validate the selected items. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 238 items, identified from 40 articles, were included in the survey and rated by physiotherapists. From survey results, a statistical-based algorithm identified 113 important topic areas for inclusion (47.48%). A modified triage technique was used to further reduce the selected areas to 90 topics. The validation process further refined the topics to 94 topics along with 13 additional site-specific topic areas. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Topics identified in this study will inform the development of a physical therapy critical care learning needs assessment tool. Our survey tool and methodological approach could guide the development of hospital-specific learning needs assessment tools in other clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Canada\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"122-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392835/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Canada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2022-0010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Canada","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2022-0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Identification, Selection, and Validation of Topic Areas for a Physical Therapy Critical Care Learning Needs Assessment Tool: A Mixed Method Approach.
Purpose: To identify, select, and validate topic areas for a physical therapy critical care learning needs assessment tool. Method: A scoping review was used to identify knowledge/skill areas relevant to physiotherapy intensive care unit (ICU) practice and develop a survey questionnaire. Physiotherapists rated the relevance of each survey item for practice in the ICU, as well as their knowledge about each item. Descriptive statistics summarized the responses. A statistically based algorithm was used to identify highly relevant items where the level of knowledge/skill was relatively low. Experienced physiotherapists were consulted to agree on the items that should be included. The process was repeated in three additional ICUs to validate the selected items. Results: A total of 238 items, identified from 40 articles, were included in the survey and rated by physiotherapists. From survey results, a statistical-based algorithm identified 113 important topic areas for inclusion (47.48%). A modified triage technique was used to further reduce the selected areas to 90 topics. The validation process further refined the topics to 94 topics along with 13 additional site-specific topic areas. Conclusions: Topics identified in this study will inform the development of a physical therapy critical care learning needs assessment tool. Our survey tool and methodological approach could guide the development of hospital-specific learning needs assessment tools in other clinical settings.
期刊介绍:
Physiotherapy Canada is the official, scholarly, refereed journal of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association (CPA), giving direction to excellence in clinical science and reasoning, knowledge translation, therapeutic skills and patient-centred care.
Founded in 1923, Physiotherapy Canada meets the diverse needs of national and international readers and serves as a key repository of inquiries, evidence and advances in the practice of physiotherapy.
Physiotherapy Canada publishes the results of qualitative and quantitative research including systematic reviews, meta analyses, meta syntheses, public/health policy research, clinical practice guidelines, and case reports. Key messages, clinical commentaries, brief reports and book reviews support knowledge translation to clinical practice.
In addition to delivering authoritative, original scientific articles and reports of significant clinical studies, Physiotherapy Canada’s editorials and abstracts are presented in both English and French, expanding the journal’s reach nationally and internationally. Key messages form an integral part of each research article, providing a succinct summary for readers of all levels. This approach also allows readers to quickly get a feel for ‘what is already known’ and ‘what this study adds to’ the subject.
Clinician’s commentaries for key articles assist in bridging research and practice by discussing the article’s impact at the clinical level. The journal also features special themed series which bring readers up to date research supporting evidence-informed practice.
The Canadian Physiotherapy Association (CPA) is the national professional association representing almost 15,000 members distributed throughout all provinces and territories. CPA’s mission is to provide leadership and direction to the physiotherapy profession, foster excellence in practice, education and research, and promote high standards of health in Canada.