临床医生的人工智能清单和评估问卷:肿瘤学家评估人工智能和机器学习模型的工具。

IF 2.8 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-17 DOI:10.1200/CCI-25-00067
Nadia S Siddiqui, Yazan Bouchi, Syed Jawad Hussain Shah, Saeed Alqarni, Suraj Sood, Yugyung Lee, John Park, John Kang
{"title":"临床医生的人工智能清单和评估问卷:肿瘤学家评估人工智能和机器学习模型的工具。","authors":"Nadia S Siddiqui, Yazan Bouchi, Syed Jawad Hussain Shah, Saeed Alqarni, Suraj Sood, Yugyung Lee, John Park, John Kang","doi":"10.1200/CCI-25-00067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advancements in oncology are accelerating in the fields of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. The complexity and multidisciplinary nature of oncology necessitate a cautious approach to evaluating AI models. The surge in development of AI tools highlights a need for organized evaluation methods. Currently, widely accepted guidelines are aimed at developers and do not provide necessary technical background for clinicians. Additionally, published guides introducing clinicians to AI in medicine often lack user-friendly evaluation tools or lack specificity to oncology. This paper provides background on model development and proposes a yes/no checklist and questionnaire designed to help oncologists effectively assess AI models. The yes/no checklist is intended to be used as a more efficient scan of whether the model conforms to published best standards. The open-ended questionnaire is intended for a more in-depth survey. The checklist and the questionnaire were developed by clinical and AI researchers. Initial discussions identified broad domains, gradually narrowing to model development points relevant to clinical practice. The development process included two literature searches to align with current best practices. Insights from 24 articles were integrated to refine the questionnaire and the checklist. The developed tools are intended for use by clinicians in the field of oncology looking to evaluate AI models. Cases of four AI applications in oncology are analyzed, demonstrating utility in real-world scenarios and enhancing case-based learning for clinicians. These tools highlight the interdisciplinary nature of effective AI integration in oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2500067"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician's Artificial Intelligence Checklist and Evaluation Questionnaire: Tools for Oncologists to Assess Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Models.\",\"authors\":\"Nadia S Siddiqui, Yazan Bouchi, Syed Jawad Hussain Shah, Saeed Alqarni, Suraj Sood, Yugyung Lee, John Park, John Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/CCI-25-00067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Advancements in oncology are accelerating in the fields of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. The complexity and multidisciplinary nature of oncology necessitate a cautious approach to evaluating AI models. The surge in development of AI tools highlights a need for organized evaluation methods. Currently, widely accepted guidelines are aimed at developers and do not provide necessary technical background for clinicians. Additionally, published guides introducing clinicians to AI in medicine often lack user-friendly evaluation tools or lack specificity to oncology. This paper provides background on model development and proposes a yes/no checklist and questionnaire designed to help oncologists effectively assess AI models. The yes/no checklist is intended to be used as a more efficient scan of whether the model conforms to published best standards. The open-ended questionnaire is intended for a more in-depth survey. The checklist and the questionnaire were developed by clinical and AI researchers. Initial discussions identified broad domains, gradually narrowing to model development points relevant to clinical practice. The development process included two literature searches to align with current best practices. Insights from 24 articles were integrated to refine the questionnaire and the checklist. The developed tools are intended for use by clinicians in the field of oncology looking to evaluate AI models. Cases of four AI applications in oncology are analyzed, demonstrating utility in real-world scenarios and enhancing case-based learning for clinicians. These tools highlight the interdisciplinary nature of effective AI integration in oncology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e2500067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-25-00067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-25-00067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肿瘤学在人工智能(AI)和机器学习领域的进展正在加速。肿瘤学的复杂性和多学科性质需要谨慎地评估人工智能模型。人工智能工具的迅猛发展凸显了对有组织的评估方法的需求。目前,广泛接受的指南是针对开发人员的,并没有为临床医生提供必要的技术背景。此外,向临床医生介绍医学人工智能的出版指南往往缺乏用户友好的评估工具或缺乏肿瘤学的特异性。本文提供了模型开发的背景,并提出了一个是/否清单和问卷,旨在帮助肿瘤学家有效地评估人工智能模型。是/否检查表用于更有效地扫描模型是否符合已发布的最佳标准。开放式问卷旨在进行更深入的调查。检查表和问卷由临床和人工智能研究人员开发。最初的讨论确定了广泛的领域,逐渐缩小到与临床实践相关的模型开发点。开发过程包括两次文献检索,以与当前的最佳实践保持一致。整合了24篇文章的见解,以完善问卷和检查表。开发的工具旨在供肿瘤领域的临床医生使用,以评估人工智能模型。分析了四种人工智能在肿瘤学中的应用案例,展示了在现实世界场景中的效用,并加强了临床医生基于案例的学习。这些工具突出了人工智能在肿瘤学中有效整合的跨学科性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinician's Artificial Intelligence Checklist and Evaluation Questionnaire: Tools for Oncologists to Assess Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Models.

Advancements in oncology are accelerating in the fields of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. The complexity and multidisciplinary nature of oncology necessitate a cautious approach to evaluating AI models. The surge in development of AI tools highlights a need for organized evaluation methods. Currently, widely accepted guidelines are aimed at developers and do not provide necessary technical background for clinicians. Additionally, published guides introducing clinicians to AI in medicine often lack user-friendly evaluation tools or lack specificity to oncology. This paper provides background on model development and proposes a yes/no checklist and questionnaire designed to help oncologists effectively assess AI models. The yes/no checklist is intended to be used as a more efficient scan of whether the model conforms to published best standards. The open-ended questionnaire is intended for a more in-depth survey. The checklist and the questionnaire were developed by clinical and AI researchers. Initial discussions identified broad domains, gradually narrowing to model development points relevant to clinical practice. The development process included two literature searches to align with current best practices. Insights from 24 articles were integrated to refine the questionnaire and the checklist. The developed tools are intended for use by clinicians in the field of oncology looking to evaluate AI models. Cases of four AI applications in oncology are analyzed, demonstrating utility in real-world scenarios and enhancing case-based learning for clinicians. These tools highlight the interdisciplinary nature of effective AI integration in oncology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信