{"title":"从不和谐到对话:超越DEI的冲突转换框架。","authors":"Ashley P Oliver","doi":"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Women, other underrepresented identities in cardiothoracic surgery and cardiothoracic anesthesia and their allies have made significant headway in improving the diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in cardiac surgery and cardiothoracic anesthesia. However, as successful as these efforts have been, they have also been met with resistance, which range in their etiologies and expression. Formal analysis of DEI resistance by professional societies, departments and divisions is lacking and yet may result in several important positive professional consequences. When conflict is left unengaged and unmanaged, it can have negative cultural effects including the erosion of trust and can amplify alienation of individuals and groups from one another. This weakens the power and efficacy of professional societies and weakens the goals of affinity and professional support. On the other hand, when professional groups explore challenged or contentious topics in structured or formal ways, this process can have the opposite effect. Formal dialogue can reduce toxic polarization: it can increase affinity, professional support, and strengthen organizations. Conflict transformation is a framework developed in an international peacekeeping context that can be useful to provide the rationale and the methodology for engaging in the conflict surrounding DEI, including more recent executive orders that ban work promoting inclusion or diversity. Specifically, conflict transformation -- a relational and context-focused framework -- can help professional societies reframe and navigate polarizing disagreements around DEI. The proposed strategies in this piece aim to use ideological conflict as an opportunity for growth. Improving discourse around these issues may improve engagement in professional societies and strengthen a culture of empathy and mutual respect. This may be the best path to ensuring excellence and equity medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":48592,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Dischord to Dialogue: A Conflict Transformation Framework to Move Beyond DEI.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley P Oliver\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2025.08.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Women, other underrepresented identities in cardiothoracic surgery and cardiothoracic anesthesia and their allies have made significant headway in improving the diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in cardiac surgery and cardiothoracic anesthesia. However, as successful as these efforts have been, they have also been met with resistance, which range in their etiologies and expression. Formal analysis of DEI resistance by professional societies, departments and divisions is lacking and yet may result in several important positive professional consequences. When conflict is left unengaged and unmanaged, it can have negative cultural effects including the erosion of trust and can amplify alienation of individuals and groups from one another. This weakens the power and efficacy of professional societies and weakens the goals of affinity and professional support. On the other hand, when professional groups explore challenged or contentious topics in structured or formal ways, this process can have the opposite effect. Formal dialogue can reduce toxic polarization: it can increase affinity, professional support, and strengthen organizations. Conflict transformation is a framework developed in an international peacekeeping context that can be useful to provide the rationale and the methodology for engaging in the conflict surrounding DEI, including more recent executive orders that ban work promoting inclusion or diversity. Specifically, conflict transformation -- a relational and context-focused framework -- can help professional societies reframe and navigate polarizing disagreements around DEI. The proposed strategies in this piece aim to use ideological conflict as an opportunity for growth. Improving discourse around these issues may improve engagement in professional societies and strengthen a culture of empathy and mutual respect. This may be the best path to ensuring excellence and equity medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2025.08.005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2025.08.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
From Dischord to Dialogue: A Conflict Transformation Framework to Move Beyond DEI.
Women, other underrepresented identities in cardiothoracic surgery and cardiothoracic anesthesia and their allies have made significant headway in improving the diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in cardiac surgery and cardiothoracic anesthesia. However, as successful as these efforts have been, they have also been met with resistance, which range in their etiologies and expression. Formal analysis of DEI resistance by professional societies, departments and divisions is lacking and yet may result in several important positive professional consequences. When conflict is left unengaged and unmanaged, it can have negative cultural effects including the erosion of trust and can amplify alienation of individuals and groups from one another. This weakens the power and efficacy of professional societies and weakens the goals of affinity and professional support. On the other hand, when professional groups explore challenged or contentious topics in structured or formal ways, this process can have the opposite effect. Formal dialogue can reduce toxic polarization: it can increase affinity, professional support, and strengthen organizations. Conflict transformation is a framework developed in an international peacekeeping context that can be useful to provide the rationale and the methodology for engaging in the conflict surrounding DEI, including more recent executive orders that ban work promoting inclusion or diversity. Specifically, conflict transformation -- a relational and context-focused framework -- can help professional societies reframe and navigate polarizing disagreements around DEI. The proposed strategies in this piece aim to use ideological conflict as an opportunity for growth. Improving discourse around these issues may improve engagement in professional societies and strengthen a culture of empathy and mutual respect. This may be the best path to ensuring excellence and equity medicine.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is devoted to providing a forum for cardiothoracic surgeons to disseminate and discuss important new information and to gain insight into unresolved areas of question in the specialty. Each issue presents readers with a selection of original peer-reviewed articles accompanied by editorial commentary from specialists in the field. In addition, readers are offered valuable invited articles: State of Views editorials and Current Readings highlighting the latest contributions on central or controversial issues. Another prized feature is expert roundtable discussions in which experts debate critical questions for cardiothoracic treatment and care. Seminars is an invitation-only publication that receives original submissions transferred ONLY from its sister publication, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. As we continue to expand the reach of the Journal, we will explore the possibility of accepting unsolicited manuscripts in the future.