{"title":"皮肤-门静脉连接处距离作为胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘的简单ct预测指标:一个验证模型。","authors":"Shinichi Ikuta, Tsukasa Aihara, Takayoshi Nakajima, Masataka Fujikawa, Naoki Yamanaka","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02397-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) remains a significant concern after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), increasing morbidity and mortality. This retrospective study evaluated the skin-to-portal junction distance (SJD), a simple CT-based metric, as a predictor of CR-POPF and developed a validated predictive model for risk stratification. The study included 305 patients undergoing open PD, divided into training (n = 214) and validation (n = 91) cohorts. Sex-specific SJD cutoffs were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Logistic regression identified CR-POPF risk factors and built the model, assessed by area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). CR-POPF occurred in 23.9% of patients overall, with incidences of 23.4% and 25.3% in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. High SJD (≥ 78 mm for males, ≥ 64 mm for females; odds ratio [OR] 5.140), main pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm (OR 2.720), non-pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (OR 3.820), and soft pancreatic texture (OR 2.660) were independent predictors. The model achieved AUCs of 0.832 in the training cohort and 0.806 in the validation cohort, with good calibration and clinical utility as shown by DCA. These results compared favorably with the Fistula Risk Score (FRS) and alternative-FRS. The high SJD group had a higher incidence of CR-POPF (36.3% vs. 14.1%, p < 0.001), longer operative time (p = 0.004), greater blood loss (p = 0.047), and more major complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III (p < 0.001). SJD is a simple, objective predictor of CR-POPF. The validated model facilitates perioperative risk stratification; however, external validation is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skin-to-portal junction distance as a simple CT-based predictor of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a validated model.\",\"authors\":\"Shinichi Ikuta, Tsukasa Aihara, Takayoshi Nakajima, Masataka Fujikawa, Naoki Yamanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-025-02397-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) remains a significant concern after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), increasing morbidity and mortality. This retrospective study evaluated the skin-to-portal junction distance (SJD), a simple CT-based metric, as a predictor of CR-POPF and developed a validated predictive model for risk stratification. The study included 305 patients undergoing open PD, divided into training (n = 214) and validation (n = 91) cohorts. Sex-specific SJD cutoffs were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Logistic regression identified CR-POPF risk factors and built the model, assessed by area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). CR-POPF occurred in 23.9% of patients overall, with incidences of 23.4% and 25.3% in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. High SJD (≥ 78 mm for males, ≥ 64 mm for females; odds ratio [OR] 5.140), main pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm (OR 2.720), non-pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (OR 3.820), and soft pancreatic texture (OR 2.660) were independent predictors. The model achieved AUCs of 0.832 in the training cohort and 0.806 in the validation cohort, with good calibration and clinical utility as shown by DCA. These results compared favorably with the Fistula Risk Score (FRS) and alternative-FRS. The high SJD group had a higher incidence of CR-POPF (36.3% vs. 14.1%, p < 0.001), longer operative time (p = 0.004), greater blood loss (p = 0.047), and more major complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III (p < 0.001). SJD is a simple, objective predictor of CR-POPF. The validated model facilitates perioperative risk stratification; however, external validation is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02397-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02397-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
临床相关的术后胰瘘(CR-POPF)仍然是胰十二指肠切除术(PD)后的一个重要问题,增加了发病率和死亡率。这项回顾性研究评估了皮肤到门静脉连接距离(SJD),一个简单的基于ct的指标,作为CR-POPF的预测因子,并开发了一个有效的风险分层预测模型。该研究包括305名接受开放性PD治疗的患者,分为训练组(n = 214)和验证组(n = 91)。利用受者工作特征分析确定性别特异性SJD截止点。Logistic回归识别CR-POPF危险因素并建立模型,通过曲线下面积(AUC)、标定图和决策曲线分析(DCA)进行评估。CR-POPF发生率为23.9%,训练组和验证组的发生率分别为23.4%和25.3%。高SJD(男性≥78 mm,女性≥64 mm;比值比[OR] 5.140)、主胰管直径≤3 mm (OR 2.720)、非胰管腺癌(OR 3.820)和胰腺质地柔软(OR 2.660)是独立预测因素。该模型在训练队列中的auc为0.832,在验证队列中的auc为0.806,DCA表明该模型具有良好的校准和临床实用性。这些结果与瘘风险评分(FRS)和替代FRS比较有利。高SJD组CR-POPF发生率较高(36.3% vs. 14.1%, p
Skin-to-portal junction distance as a simple CT-based predictor of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a validated model.
Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) remains a significant concern after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), increasing morbidity and mortality. This retrospective study evaluated the skin-to-portal junction distance (SJD), a simple CT-based metric, as a predictor of CR-POPF and developed a validated predictive model for risk stratification. The study included 305 patients undergoing open PD, divided into training (n = 214) and validation (n = 91) cohorts. Sex-specific SJD cutoffs were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Logistic regression identified CR-POPF risk factors and built the model, assessed by area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). CR-POPF occurred in 23.9% of patients overall, with incidences of 23.4% and 25.3% in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. High SJD (≥ 78 mm for males, ≥ 64 mm for females; odds ratio [OR] 5.140), main pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm (OR 2.720), non-pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (OR 3.820), and soft pancreatic texture (OR 2.660) were independent predictors. The model achieved AUCs of 0.832 in the training cohort and 0.806 in the validation cohort, with good calibration and clinical utility as shown by DCA. These results compared favorably with the Fistula Risk Score (FRS) and alternative-FRS. The high SJD group had a higher incidence of CR-POPF (36.3% vs. 14.1%, p < 0.001), longer operative time (p = 0.004), greater blood loss (p = 0.047), and more major complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III (p < 0.001). SJD is a simple, objective predictor of CR-POPF. The validated model facilitates perioperative risk stratification; however, external validation is needed.
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.