Igor Monsellato, Teresa Gatto, Marco Palucci, Federico Sangiuolo, Mariantonietta Alagia, Fabio Giannone, Gianluca Cassese, Celeste Del Basso, Gabriela Del Angel-Millán, Fabrizio Panaro
{"title":"优化的“全右”仪器配置在机器人直肠手术与达芬奇Xi系统:一个前瞻性的单中心经验。","authors":"Igor Monsellato, Teresa Gatto, Marco Palucci, Federico Sangiuolo, Mariantonietta Alagia, Fabio Giannone, Gianluca Cassese, Celeste Del Basso, Gabriela Del Angel-Millán, Fabrizio Panaro","doi":"10.1177/15533506251374470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundRobotic surgery for rectal cancer offers enhanced visualization, instrument articulation, and ergonomic benefits in confined pelvic spaces. However, the effectiveness of robotic procedures depends heavily on trocar positioning and instrument layout. Conventional configurations often require intraoperative instrument swapping or camera repositioning, potentially disrupting workflow and increasing cognitive strain. To address these limitations, we implemented a standardized \"full right\" instrument configuration using the Da Vinci Xi system to improve ergonomic control and procedural stability.MethodsWe conducted a prospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients undergoing robotic rectal resection at a high-volume tertiary center using the full right configuration. All robotic arms and the assistant port were positioned along the patient's right side, with the camera fixed on Arm 2 throughout the procedure. Operative, perioperative, and pathological outcomes were evaluated.ResultsThe mean console time was 170 min, and the mean operative time was 192 min. No conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. No instrument collisions were observed. Estimated blood loss was minimal in all cases. The mean hospital stay was 5.2 days. All patients achieved complete (grade 3) mesorectal excision, with a mean lymph node yield of 16.4 and negative margins in every case. No major postoperative complications were reported.ConclusionsThe full right configuration for robotic rectal resection is associated with favorable short-term outcomes, improved ergonomic conditions, and stable instrument positioning. This layout supports consistent workflow across all operative phases and may reduce intraoperative cognitive load. Further validation through larger comparative studies is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251374470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimized 'Full Right' Instrument Configuration in Robotic Rectal Surgery With the Da Vinci Xi System: A Prospective Single-Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Igor Monsellato, Teresa Gatto, Marco Palucci, Federico Sangiuolo, Mariantonietta Alagia, Fabio Giannone, Gianluca Cassese, Celeste Del Basso, Gabriela Del Angel-Millán, Fabrizio Panaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15533506251374470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundRobotic surgery for rectal cancer offers enhanced visualization, instrument articulation, and ergonomic benefits in confined pelvic spaces. However, the effectiveness of robotic procedures depends heavily on trocar positioning and instrument layout. Conventional configurations often require intraoperative instrument swapping or camera repositioning, potentially disrupting workflow and increasing cognitive strain. To address these limitations, we implemented a standardized \\\"full right\\\" instrument configuration using the Da Vinci Xi system to improve ergonomic control and procedural stability.MethodsWe conducted a prospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients undergoing robotic rectal resection at a high-volume tertiary center using the full right configuration. All robotic arms and the assistant port were positioned along the patient's right side, with the camera fixed on Arm 2 throughout the procedure. Operative, perioperative, and pathological outcomes were evaluated.ResultsThe mean console time was 170 min, and the mean operative time was 192 min. No conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. No instrument collisions were observed. Estimated blood loss was minimal in all cases. The mean hospital stay was 5.2 days. All patients achieved complete (grade 3) mesorectal excision, with a mean lymph node yield of 16.4 and negative margins in every case. No major postoperative complications were reported.ConclusionsThe full right configuration for robotic rectal resection is associated with favorable short-term outcomes, improved ergonomic conditions, and stable instrument positioning. This layout supports consistent workflow across all operative phases and may reduce intraoperative cognitive load. Further validation through larger comparative studies is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15533506251374470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251374470\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251374470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimized 'Full Right' Instrument Configuration in Robotic Rectal Surgery With the Da Vinci Xi System: A Prospective Single-Center Experience.
BackgroundRobotic surgery for rectal cancer offers enhanced visualization, instrument articulation, and ergonomic benefits in confined pelvic spaces. However, the effectiveness of robotic procedures depends heavily on trocar positioning and instrument layout. Conventional configurations often require intraoperative instrument swapping or camera repositioning, potentially disrupting workflow and increasing cognitive strain. To address these limitations, we implemented a standardized "full right" instrument configuration using the Da Vinci Xi system to improve ergonomic control and procedural stability.MethodsWe conducted a prospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients undergoing robotic rectal resection at a high-volume tertiary center using the full right configuration. All robotic arms and the assistant port were positioned along the patient's right side, with the camera fixed on Arm 2 throughout the procedure. Operative, perioperative, and pathological outcomes were evaluated.ResultsThe mean console time was 170 min, and the mean operative time was 192 min. No conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. No instrument collisions were observed. Estimated blood loss was minimal in all cases. The mean hospital stay was 5.2 days. All patients achieved complete (grade 3) mesorectal excision, with a mean lymph node yield of 16.4 and negative margins in every case. No major postoperative complications were reported.ConclusionsThe full right configuration for robotic rectal resection is associated with favorable short-term outcomes, improved ergonomic conditions, and stable instrument positioning. This layout supports consistent workflow across all operative phases and may reduce intraoperative cognitive load. Further validation through larger comparative studies is warranted.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).