优化的“全右”仪器配置在机器人直肠手术与达芬奇Xi系统:一个前瞻性的单中心经验。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Igor Monsellato, Teresa Gatto, Marco Palucci, Federico Sangiuolo, Mariantonietta Alagia, Fabio Giannone, Gianluca Cassese, Celeste Del Basso, Gabriela Del Angel-Millán, Fabrizio Panaro
{"title":"优化的“全右”仪器配置在机器人直肠手术与达芬奇Xi系统:一个前瞻性的单中心经验。","authors":"Igor Monsellato, Teresa Gatto, Marco Palucci, Federico Sangiuolo, Mariantonietta Alagia, Fabio Giannone, Gianluca Cassese, Celeste Del Basso, Gabriela Del Angel-Millán, Fabrizio Panaro","doi":"10.1177/15533506251374470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundRobotic surgery for rectal cancer offers enhanced visualization, instrument articulation, and ergonomic benefits in confined pelvic spaces. However, the effectiveness of robotic procedures depends heavily on trocar positioning and instrument layout. Conventional configurations often require intraoperative instrument swapping or camera repositioning, potentially disrupting workflow and increasing cognitive strain. To address these limitations, we implemented a standardized \"full right\" instrument configuration using the Da Vinci Xi system to improve ergonomic control and procedural stability.MethodsWe conducted a prospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients undergoing robotic rectal resection at a high-volume tertiary center using the full right configuration. All robotic arms and the assistant port were positioned along the patient's right side, with the camera fixed on Arm 2 throughout the procedure. Operative, perioperative, and pathological outcomes were evaluated.ResultsThe mean console time was 170 min, and the mean operative time was 192 min. No conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. No instrument collisions were observed. Estimated blood loss was minimal in all cases. The mean hospital stay was 5.2 days. All patients achieved complete (grade 3) mesorectal excision, with a mean lymph node yield of 16.4 and negative margins in every case. No major postoperative complications were reported.ConclusionsThe full right configuration for robotic rectal resection is associated with favorable short-term outcomes, improved ergonomic conditions, and stable instrument positioning. This layout supports consistent workflow across all operative phases and may reduce intraoperative cognitive load. Further validation through larger comparative studies is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251374470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimized 'Full Right' Instrument Configuration in Robotic Rectal Surgery With the Da Vinci Xi System: A Prospective Single-Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Igor Monsellato, Teresa Gatto, Marco Palucci, Federico Sangiuolo, Mariantonietta Alagia, Fabio Giannone, Gianluca Cassese, Celeste Del Basso, Gabriela Del Angel-Millán, Fabrizio Panaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15533506251374470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundRobotic surgery for rectal cancer offers enhanced visualization, instrument articulation, and ergonomic benefits in confined pelvic spaces. However, the effectiveness of robotic procedures depends heavily on trocar positioning and instrument layout. Conventional configurations often require intraoperative instrument swapping or camera repositioning, potentially disrupting workflow and increasing cognitive strain. To address these limitations, we implemented a standardized \\\"full right\\\" instrument configuration using the Da Vinci Xi system to improve ergonomic control and procedural stability.MethodsWe conducted a prospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients undergoing robotic rectal resection at a high-volume tertiary center using the full right configuration. All robotic arms and the assistant port were positioned along the patient's right side, with the camera fixed on Arm 2 throughout the procedure. Operative, perioperative, and pathological outcomes were evaluated.ResultsThe mean console time was 170 min, and the mean operative time was 192 min. No conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. No instrument collisions were observed. Estimated blood loss was minimal in all cases. The mean hospital stay was 5.2 days. All patients achieved complete (grade 3) mesorectal excision, with a mean lymph node yield of 16.4 and negative margins in every case. No major postoperative complications were reported.ConclusionsThe full right configuration for robotic rectal resection is associated with favorable short-term outcomes, improved ergonomic conditions, and stable instrument positioning. This layout supports consistent workflow across all operative phases and may reduce intraoperative cognitive load. Further validation through larger comparative studies is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15533506251374470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251374470\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251374470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:直肠癌的机器人手术在狭窄的骨盆空间中提供了增强的可视化、器械关节和人体工程学的好处。然而,机器人手术的有效性在很大程度上取决于套管针的定位和器械的布局。传统的配置通常需要术中更换器械或重新定位相机,这可能会破坏工作流程并增加认知压力。为了解决这些限制,我们使用达芬奇Xi系统实现了标准化的“全权利”仪器配置,以提高人体工程学控制和程序稳定性。方法:我们对22例连续在大容量三级中心采用全右配置进行机器人直肠切除术的患者进行前瞻性分析。所有机械臂和辅助端口沿患者右侧放置,相机在整个过程中固定在2号臂上。评估手术、围手术期和病理结果。结果平均手术时间192 min,平均手术时间170 min。无转诊及术中并发症发生。没有观察到仪器碰撞。所有病例的估计失血量都很小。平均住院时间为5.2天。所有患者都完成了完整的(3级)直肠系膜切除术,平均淋巴结率为16.4,阴性边缘。术后无重大并发症。结论机器人直肠切除术的完全正确配置具有良好的短期预后,改善了人体工程学条件,并且器械定位稳定。这种布局支持所有手术阶段的一致工作流程,并可能减少术中认知负荷。有必要通过更大规模的比较研究进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimized 'Full Right' Instrument Configuration in Robotic Rectal Surgery With the Da Vinci Xi System: A Prospective Single-Center Experience.

BackgroundRobotic surgery for rectal cancer offers enhanced visualization, instrument articulation, and ergonomic benefits in confined pelvic spaces. However, the effectiveness of robotic procedures depends heavily on trocar positioning and instrument layout. Conventional configurations often require intraoperative instrument swapping or camera repositioning, potentially disrupting workflow and increasing cognitive strain. To address these limitations, we implemented a standardized "full right" instrument configuration using the Da Vinci Xi system to improve ergonomic control and procedural stability.MethodsWe conducted a prospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients undergoing robotic rectal resection at a high-volume tertiary center using the full right configuration. All robotic arms and the assistant port were positioned along the patient's right side, with the camera fixed on Arm 2 throughout the procedure. Operative, perioperative, and pathological outcomes were evaluated.ResultsThe mean console time was 170 min, and the mean operative time was 192 min. No conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. No instrument collisions were observed. Estimated blood loss was minimal in all cases. The mean hospital stay was 5.2 days. All patients achieved complete (grade 3) mesorectal excision, with a mean lymph node yield of 16.4 and negative margins in every case. No major postoperative complications were reported.ConclusionsThe full right configuration for robotic rectal resection is associated with favorable short-term outcomes, improved ergonomic conditions, and stable instrument positioning. This layout supports consistent workflow across all operative phases and may reduce intraoperative cognitive load. Further validation through larger comparative studies is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信