术前因素影响小肠梗阻手术治疗技术选择:来自SnapSBO多国前瞻性观察研究的结果。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Isidro Martinez-Casas, Lewis J Kaplan, Carlos Javier Garcia Sánchez, Felipe Pareja Ciuró, Matteo Cimino, Hayato Kurihara, Matthew J Lee, Shahin Mohseni, Gary A Bass
{"title":"术前因素影响小肠梗阻手术治疗技术选择:来自SnapSBO多国前瞻性观察研究的结果。","authors":"Isidro Martinez-Casas, Lewis J Kaplan, Carlos Javier Garcia Sánchez, Felipe Pareja Ciuró, Matteo Cimino, Hayato Kurihara, Matthew J Lee, Shahin Mohseni, Gary A Bass","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12226-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Laparoscopic surgery is a standard approach for many elective gastrointestinal procedures but remains underutilized for emergent small bowel obstruction (SBO) resolution. This study evaluates how preoperative factors influence the initial choice of laparoscopic versus open surgery for SBO, and how intra-operative events may modify the initial operative approach and impact outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, multicenter, multinational time-bound observational study of SBO patients. Preoperative data and operative details were collected. Primary outcome was initial surgical approach (laparoscopic or open). Secondary outcomes included conversion to open and post-operative complications. Uni- and multivariable analyses identified predictors of approach selection and conversion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1737 patients, 876 (50.4%) underwent surgery with 172 (19.6%) initially explored using laparoscopy; 60 (34.8%) of those cases converted to open. Laparoscopy was initially pursued in younger patients (mean 60.9 ± 18.2 vs. 66.5 ± 17.5 years, p < 0.001), with fewer comorbidities (66.3% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.018), and less frequent prior abdominal surgery (43.6% vs. 29.8%, p < 0.001) or multiple previous operations (mean 1.5 ± 1 vs. 1.9 ± 1.3, p = 0.03). Presumed etiology influenced approach: laparoscopy was more frequently utilized for adhesive single-band obstructions (60.5% vs. 45.2%), whereas open surgery was more common for hernias (24.4% vs. 38.1%). Both abdominal malignancy (OR = 4.74, p = 0.015) and free intraperitoneal fluid on CT (OR = 6.79, p < 0.001) surfaced as independent predictors of conversion. Laparoscopy was associated with fewer complications (surgical: 13.9% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.009; medical: 9.8% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.001) and lower mortality (0.6% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001) than open surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative patient factors and disease etiology are associated with initial operative technique selection, while intraoperative events and findings appear to adjust the probability of conversion to open. Preoperative assessment combined with flexibility in intraoperative decision-making appears to be associated with optimal outcomes in SBO management.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative factors influence technique selection in surgical management of small bowel obstruction: findings from the SnapSBO multinational prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Isidro Martinez-Casas, Lewis J Kaplan, Carlos Javier Garcia Sánchez, Felipe Pareja Ciuró, Matteo Cimino, Hayato Kurihara, Matthew J Lee, Shahin Mohseni, Gary A Bass\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-12226-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Laparoscopic surgery is a standard approach for many elective gastrointestinal procedures but remains underutilized for emergent small bowel obstruction (SBO) resolution. This study evaluates how preoperative factors influence the initial choice of laparoscopic versus open surgery for SBO, and how intra-operative events may modify the initial operative approach and impact outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, multicenter, multinational time-bound observational study of SBO patients. Preoperative data and operative details were collected. Primary outcome was initial surgical approach (laparoscopic or open). Secondary outcomes included conversion to open and post-operative complications. Uni- and multivariable analyses identified predictors of approach selection and conversion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1737 patients, 876 (50.4%) underwent surgery with 172 (19.6%) initially explored using laparoscopy; 60 (34.8%) of those cases converted to open. Laparoscopy was initially pursued in younger patients (mean 60.9 ± 18.2 vs. 66.5 ± 17.5 years, p < 0.001), with fewer comorbidities (66.3% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.018), and less frequent prior abdominal surgery (43.6% vs. 29.8%, p < 0.001) or multiple previous operations (mean 1.5 ± 1 vs. 1.9 ± 1.3, p = 0.03). Presumed etiology influenced approach: laparoscopy was more frequently utilized for adhesive single-band obstructions (60.5% vs. 45.2%), whereas open surgery was more common for hernias (24.4% vs. 38.1%). Both abdominal malignancy (OR = 4.74, p = 0.015) and free intraperitoneal fluid on CT (OR = 6.79, p < 0.001) surfaced as independent predictors of conversion. Laparoscopy was associated with fewer complications (surgical: 13.9% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.009; medical: 9.8% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.001) and lower mortality (0.6% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001) than open surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative patient factors and disease etiology are associated with initial operative technique selection, while intraoperative events and findings appear to adjust the probability of conversion to open. Preoperative assessment combined with flexibility in intraoperative decision-making appears to be associated with optimal outcomes in SBO management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12226-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12226-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:腹腔镜手术是许多选择性胃肠道手术的标准方法,但在紧急小肠梗阻(SBO)的解决中仍未充分利用。本研究评估术前因素如何影响SBO的腹腔镜手术与开放手术的初始选择,以及术中事件如何改变初始手术入路和影响结果。方法:对SBO患者进行前瞻性、多中心、多国有时限的观察性研究。收集术前资料及手术细节。主要结局为初始手术入路(腹腔镜或开放)。次要结局包括转开和术后并发症。单变量和多变量分析确定了方法选择和转换的预测因子。结果:在1737例患者中,876例(50.4%)接受了手术,其中172例(19.6%)最初采用腹腔镜检查;其中60例(34.8%)转为结案。较年轻的患者(平均60.9±18.2岁vs. 66.5±17.5岁)最初采用腹腔镜手术(p)。结论:术前患者因素和疾病病因与初始手术技术选择相关,而术中事件和发现似乎调整了转开的可能性。术前评估结合术中决策的灵活性似乎与SBO治疗的最佳结果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative factors influence technique selection in surgical management of small bowel obstruction: findings from the SnapSBO multinational prospective observational study.

Objectives: Laparoscopic surgery is a standard approach for many elective gastrointestinal procedures but remains underutilized for emergent small bowel obstruction (SBO) resolution. This study evaluates how preoperative factors influence the initial choice of laparoscopic versus open surgery for SBO, and how intra-operative events may modify the initial operative approach and impact outcomes.

Methods: Prospective, multicenter, multinational time-bound observational study of SBO patients. Preoperative data and operative details were collected. Primary outcome was initial surgical approach (laparoscopic or open). Secondary outcomes included conversion to open and post-operative complications. Uni- and multivariable analyses identified predictors of approach selection and conversion.

Results: Of 1737 patients, 876 (50.4%) underwent surgery with 172 (19.6%) initially explored using laparoscopy; 60 (34.8%) of those cases converted to open. Laparoscopy was initially pursued in younger patients (mean 60.9 ± 18.2 vs. 66.5 ± 17.5 years, p < 0.001), with fewer comorbidities (66.3% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.018), and less frequent prior abdominal surgery (43.6% vs. 29.8%, p < 0.001) or multiple previous operations (mean 1.5 ± 1 vs. 1.9 ± 1.3, p = 0.03). Presumed etiology influenced approach: laparoscopy was more frequently utilized for adhesive single-band obstructions (60.5% vs. 45.2%), whereas open surgery was more common for hernias (24.4% vs. 38.1%). Both abdominal malignancy (OR = 4.74, p = 0.015) and free intraperitoneal fluid on CT (OR = 6.79, p < 0.001) surfaced as independent predictors of conversion. Laparoscopy was associated with fewer complications (surgical: 13.9% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.009; medical: 9.8% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.001) and lower mortality (0.6% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001) than open surgery.

Conclusions: Preoperative patient factors and disease etiology are associated with initial operative technique selection, while intraoperative events and findings appear to adjust the probability of conversion to open. Preoperative assessment combined with flexibility in intraoperative decision-making appears to be associated with optimal outcomes in SBO management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信