透明质酸注射与皮质类固醇注射对手部骨关节炎的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.6 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Saran Malisorn, Non Sowanna, Kansak Boonpattharatthiti, Teerapon Dhippayom
{"title":"透明质酸注射与皮质类固醇注射对手部骨关节炎的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Saran Malisorn, Non Sowanna, Kansak Boonpattharatthiti, Teerapon Dhippayom","doi":"10.4082/kjfm.25.0125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment of hand osteoarthritis (OA) often includes corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections. Some studies have reported better pain relief and improved function, whereas others have reported minimal long-term benefits. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of corticosteroids and HA injections on the management of hand OA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and EBSCO Open Disk were searched from their inception to May 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intra-articular corticosteroid and HA injections in adults with hand OA were included. Data on demographics, interventions, and outcomes were extracted and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2. We performed a pairwise meta-analysis using a random-effects model to estimate the pooled effects of the included trials, that is, standardized mean differences (SMDs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 189 articles, three RCTs involving 180 participants (mean age, 62-62.9 years) were included. One RCT was identified through a database search, and two RCTs were identified through other searching techniques. The risk of bias was considered low in two trials and high in one trial. No significant difference in pain relief was found between the corticosteroid and HA treatments (SMD, 0.06; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.35; I2=0.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Corticosteroid and HA injections offered similar pain relief in patients with hand OA. Further long-term studies are necessary to evaluate the functional outcomes and potential side effects. However, this conclusion should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size of the studies (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024511411).</p>","PeriodicalId":17893,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of hyaluronic acid injection compared to corticosteroids injection in hand osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.\",\"authors\":\"Saran Malisorn, Non Sowanna, Kansak Boonpattharatthiti, Teerapon Dhippayom\",\"doi\":\"10.4082/kjfm.25.0125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment of hand osteoarthritis (OA) often includes corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections. Some studies have reported better pain relief and improved function, whereas others have reported minimal long-term benefits. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of corticosteroids and HA injections on the management of hand OA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and EBSCO Open Disk were searched from their inception to May 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intra-articular corticosteroid and HA injections in adults with hand OA were included. Data on demographics, interventions, and outcomes were extracted and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2. We performed a pairwise meta-analysis using a random-effects model to estimate the pooled effects of the included trials, that is, standardized mean differences (SMDs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 189 articles, three RCTs involving 180 participants (mean age, 62-62.9 years) were included. One RCT was identified through a database search, and two RCTs were identified through other searching techniques. The risk of bias was considered low in two trials and high in one trial. No significant difference in pain relief was found between the corticosteroid and HA treatments (SMD, 0.06; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.35; I2=0.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Corticosteroid and HA injections offered similar pain relief in patients with hand OA. Further long-term studies are necessary to evaluate the functional outcomes and potential side effects. However, this conclusion should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size of the studies (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024511411).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.25.0125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.25.0125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手骨关节炎(OA)的治疗通常包括皮质类固醇和透明质酸(HA)注射。一些研究报告了更好的疼痛缓解和功能改善,而另一些研究报告了最小的长期益处。本研究旨在评估皮质类固醇和透明质酸注射对手部OA治疗的影响。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、CENTRAL和EBSCO Open Disk自成立至2024年5月的数据库。随机对照试验(rct)比较关节内皮质类固醇和HA注射对成年手性OA患者的影响。提取人口统计学、干预措施和结局数据,并使用Cochrane risk of bias 2评估偏倚风险。我们使用随机效应模型进行两两荟萃分析,以估计纳入试验的合并效应,即标准化平均差异(SMDs)及其相应的95%置信区间(CIs)。结果:189篇文章纳入3项随机对照试验,涉及180名参与者(平均年龄62-62.9岁)。通过数据库检索确定了1个RCT,通过其他检索技术确定了2个RCT。两项试验认为偏倚风险低,一项试验认为偏倚风险高。皮质类固醇和透明质酸治疗在疼痛缓解方面无显著差异(SMD, 0.06; 95% CI, -0.23 ~ 0.35; I2=0.0%)。结论:皮质类固醇和透明质酸注射对手部OA患者的疼痛缓解效果相似。需要进一步的长期研究来评估功能结果和潜在的副作用。然而,由于研究样本量较小(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024511411),该结论应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of hyaluronic acid injection compared to corticosteroids injection in hand osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Background: Treatment of hand osteoarthritis (OA) often includes corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections. Some studies have reported better pain relief and improved function, whereas others have reported minimal long-term benefits. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of corticosteroids and HA injections on the management of hand OA.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and EBSCO Open Disk were searched from their inception to May 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intra-articular corticosteroid and HA injections in adults with hand OA were included. Data on demographics, interventions, and outcomes were extracted and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2. We performed a pairwise meta-analysis using a random-effects model to estimate the pooled effects of the included trials, that is, standardized mean differences (SMDs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Of 189 articles, three RCTs involving 180 participants (mean age, 62-62.9 years) were included. One RCT was identified through a database search, and two RCTs were identified through other searching techniques. The risk of bias was considered low in two trials and high in one trial. No significant difference in pain relief was found between the corticosteroid and HA treatments (SMD, 0.06; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.35; I2=0.0%).

Conclusion: Corticosteroid and HA injections offered similar pain relief in patients with hand OA. Further long-term studies are necessary to evaluate the functional outcomes and potential side effects. However, this conclusion should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size of the studies (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024511411).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Family Medicine
Korean Journal of Family Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信