AMCP真实证据标准:克服在美国付款人决策中使用真实证据的障碍。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Catherine M Lockhart, Elizabeth Powers, Brian Sweet, Patrick P Gleason, Diana Brixner
{"title":"AMCP真实证据标准:克服在美国付款人决策中使用真实证据的障碍。","authors":"Catherine M Lockhart, Elizabeth Powers, Brian Sweet, Patrick P Gleason, Diana Brixner","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.25108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>US payers are interested in incorporating real-world evidence (RWE) into their pharmaceutical coverage and reimbursement decisions. One barrier to using RWE to inform decisions is the lack of standards for RWE assessment and interpretation specific to US payer needs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop RWE standards supporting US payer decision-making through a framework outlining study types and potential endpoints important to US payers throughout a product's lifecycle and a set of criteria, tailored to US payer needs, for assessing and applying RWE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Research Institute, in partnership with IQVIA, convened a multistakeholder group of RWE experts to complete a survey and participate in a series of workshops with the goal of developing RWE standards tailored to payer decision-making needs. Informed by a targeted literature search, we created an initial list of RWE assessment criteria relevant to payers and refined by consensus and a framework describing RWE appropriate to different product lifecycle stages from pre- to postapproval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 payers completed the survey, and few (18%) reported regularly using RWE as part of their decision process; however, most (80%) were interested in using it. There was consensus on the need for a set of payer-specific standards. Through 2 focus groups and an AMCP Partnership Forum, participants vetted, refined, and finalized this payer-specific framework and developed a checklist that comprised a total of 29 RWE assessment criteria across 6 categories. This framework and set of criteria became the final AMCP RWE standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AMCP RWE standards provide a tool to facilitate payer-specific assessments of RWE and guidance for designing RWE studies and communicating results that will be most impactful for payer formulary and coverage decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AMCP real-world evidence standards: Overcoming barriers to using real-world evidence in US payer decision-making.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine M Lockhart, Elizabeth Powers, Brian Sweet, Patrick P Gleason, Diana Brixner\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/jmcp.2025.25108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>US payers are interested in incorporating real-world evidence (RWE) into their pharmaceutical coverage and reimbursement decisions. One barrier to using RWE to inform decisions is the lack of standards for RWE assessment and interpretation specific to US payer needs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop RWE standards supporting US payer decision-making through a framework outlining study types and potential endpoints important to US payers throughout a product's lifecycle and a set of criteria, tailored to US payer needs, for assessing and applying RWE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Research Institute, in partnership with IQVIA, convened a multistakeholder group of RWE experts to complete a survey and participate in a series of workshops with the goal of developing RWE standards tailored to payer decision-making needs. Informed by a targeted literature search, we created an initial list of RWE assessment criteria relevant to payers and refined by consensus and a framework describing RWE appropriate to different product lifecycle stages from pre- to postapproval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 payers completed the survey, and few (18%) reported regularly using RWE as part of their decision process; however, most (80%) were interested in using it. There was consensus on the need for a set of payer-specific standards. Through 2 focus groups and an AMCP Partnership Forum, participants vetted, refined, and finalized this payer-specific framework and developed a checklist that comprised a total of 29 RWE assessment criteria across 6 categories. This framework and set of criteria became the final AMCP RWE standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AMCP RWE standards provide a tool to facilitate payer-specific assessments of RWE and guidance for designing RWE studies and communicating results that will be most impactful for payer formulary and coverage decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.25108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.25108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国支付者对将真实世界证据(RWE)纳入其药品覆盖和报销决策感兴趣。使用RWE为决策提供信息的一个障碍是缺乏针对美国付款人需求的RWE评估和解释标准。目标:通过概述研究类型和在整个产品生命周期中对美国支付方重要的潜在终点的框架,以及一套针对美国支付方需求的标准,制定支持美国支付方决策的RWE标准,以评估和应用RWE。方法:管理式护理药房学院(AMCP)研究所与IQVIA合作,召集了一个由莱茵集团专家组成的多利益相关方小组,完成了一项调查,并参加了一系列研讨会,目标是制定符合付款人决策需求的莱茵集团标准。通过有针对性的文献检索,我们创建了与付款人相关的RWE评估标准的初始列表,并通过共识和描述RWE的框架进行了细化,该框架适用于从批准前到批准后的不同产品生命周期阶段。结果:共有36名支付者完成了调查,很少有人(18%)表示经常使用RWE作为他们决策过程的一部分;然而,大多数人(80%)对使用它感兴趣。大家一致认为有必要制定一套针对付款人的标准。通过两个焦点小组和一个AMCP伙伴论坛,参与者审查、完善并最终确定了这一针对付款人的框架,并制定了一份清单,其中包括6个类别的29项RWE评估标准。该框架和标准集成为最终的AMCP RWE标准。结论:AMCP RWE标准提供了一种工具,以促进针对付款人的RWE评估,并为设计RWE研究和传达结果提供指导,这些结果将对付款人的处方和覆盖决策产生最大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AMCP real-world evidence standards: Overcoming barriers to using real-world evidence in US payer decision-making.

Background: US payers are interested in incorporating real-world evidence (RWE) into their pharmaceutical coverage and reimbursement decisions. One barrier to using RWE to inform decisions is the lack of standards for RWE assessment and interpretation specific to US payer needs.

Objective: To develop RWE standards supporting US payer decision-making through a framework outlining study types and potential endpoints important to US payers throughout a product's lifecycle and a set of criteria, tailored to US payer needs, for assessing and applying RWE.

Methods: The Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Research Institute, in partnership with IQVIA, convened a multistakeholder group of RWE experts to complete a survey and participate in a series of workshops with the goal of developing RWE standards tailored to payer decision-making needs. Informed by a targeted literature search, we created an initial list of RWE assessment criteria relevant to payers and refined by consensus and a framework describing RWE appropriate to different product lifecycle stages from pre- to postapproval.

Results: A total of 36 payers completed the survey, and few (18%) reported regularly using RWE as part of their decision process; however, most (80%) were interested in using it. There was consensus on the need for a set of payer-specific standards. Through 2 focus groups and an AMCP Partnership Forum, participants vetted, refined, and finalized this payer-specific framework and developed a checklist that comprised a total of 29 RWE assessment criteria across 6 categories. This framework and set of criteria became the final AMCP RWE standards.

Conclusions: The AMCP RWE standards provide a tool to facilitate payer-specific assessments of RWE and guidance for designing RWE studies and communicating results that will be most impactful for payer formulary and coverage decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信