家庭远程放射工作站的技术要求和优化策略:综述文章。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mustafa S Alhasan, Ayman S Alhasan
{"title":"家庭远程放射工作站的技术要求和优化策略:综述文章。","authors":"Mustafa S Alhasan, Ayman S Alhasan","doi":"10.1186/s13244-025-02081-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Teleradiology has advanced from an occasional modality to a cornerstone of modern radiology practice, with the COVID-19 pandemic catalyzing widespread adoption of home-based reading environments. This review synthesizes current literature and expert recommendations on hardware and software optimization for effective home-based teleradiology implementation. Available data indicate 65% of institutions established home workstations during the pandemic, with 74% transitioning routine daytime shifts to internal teleradiology. We reviewed key components of successful remote reading environments, including diagnostic display specifications, environmental controls, ergonomic considerations, computational infrastructure, and network architecture. Evidence suggests that properly configured remote workstations maintain diagnostic performance equivalent to hospital reading rooms while enhancing radiologist satisfaction and productivity. We found that 65% of radiologists reported reduced stress levels when working from home, and 96% observed similar or improved report turnaround times. Essential technical specifications include display luminance standards, ambient lighting levels between 25 and 75 lux, acoustic conditions below 40 decibels, and temperature control within 20-24 °C. Computational requirements include a minimum sustained bandwidth of 50-100 Mbps. We review multi-layered security architectures and workflow integration strategies supporting distributed reading environments. Our review concludes that properly implemented home-based teleradiology is a viable practice model extending specialized expertise across geographic boundaries while promoting radiologist well-being. However, knowledge gaps remain in technical standardization, regulatory harmonization, and long-term clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for further research to support confident, data-driven teleradiology implementation. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This review critically evaluates the technical, ergonomic, and operational requirements for home-based teleradiology, offering evidence-based recommendations that address current practice gaps and support the development of sustainable, high-performance remote reading environments in modern clinical radiology. KEY POINTS: Home teleradiology maintains diagnostic quality while improving radiologist well-being; 65% report reduced stress and 96% show similar or improved report turnaround times. Optimal implementation requires medical-grade displays, a controlled environment (25-75 lux lighting), 50-100 Mbps bandwidth, and robust security measures. Standardization varies across jurisdictions; some countries have protocols, but gaps persist in cross-border teleradiology and long-term outcomes assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"198"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical requirements and optimization strategies for home-based teleradiology workstations: a review article.\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa S Alhasan, Ayman S Alhasan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13244-025-02081-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Teleradiology has advanced from an occasional modality to a cornerstone of modern radiology practice, with the COVID-19 pandemic catalyzing widespread adoption of home-based reading environments. This review synthesizes current literature and expert recommendations on hardware and software optimization for effective home-based teleradiology implementation. Available data indicate 65% of institutions established home workstations during the pandemic, with 74% transitioning routine daytime shifts to internal teleradiology. We reviewed key components of successful remote reading environments, including diagnostic display specifications, environmental controls, ergonomic considerations, computational infrastructure, and network architecture. Evidence suggests that properly configured remote workstations maintain diagnostic performance equivalent to hospital reading rooms while enhancing radiologist satisfaction and productivity. We found that 65% of radiologists reported reduced stress levels when working from home, and 96% observed similar or improved report turnaround times. Essential technical specifications include display luminance standards, ambient lighting levels between 25 and 75 lux, acoustic conditions below 40 decibels, and temperature control within 20-24 °C. Computational requirements include a minimum sustained bandwidth of 50-100 Mbps. We review multi-layered security architectures and workflow integration strategies supporting distributed reading environments. Our review concludes that properly implemented home-based teleradiology is a viable practice model extending specialized expertise across geographic boundaries while promoting radiologist well-being. However, knowledge gaps remain in technical standardization, regulatory harmonization, and long-term clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for further research to support confident, data-driven teleradiology implementation. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This review critically evaluates the technical, ergonomic, and operational requirements for home-based teleradiology, offering evidence-based recommendations that address current practice gaps and support the development of sustainable, high-performance remote reading environments in modern clinical radiology. KEY POINTS: Home teleradiology maintains diagnostic quality while improving radiologist well-being; 65% report reduced stress and 96% show similar or improved report turnaround times. Optimal implementation requires medical-grade displays, a controlled environment (25-75 lux lighting), 50-100 Mbps bandwidth, and robust security measures. Standardization varies across jurisdictions; some countries have protocols, but gaps persist in cross-border teleradiology and long-term outcomes assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446176/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02081-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02081-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行推动家庭阅读环境的广泛采用,远程放射学已从一种偶尔出现的模式发展成为现代放射学实践的基石。这篇综述综合了目前的文献和专家关于硬件和软件优化的建议,以实现有效的家庭远程放射学实施。现有数据表明,大流行期间,65%的机构建立了家庭工作站,74%的机构将常规日间轮班改为内部远程放射学。我们回顾了成功远程阅读环境的关键组成部分,包括诊断显示规范、环境控制、人体工程学考虑、计算基础设施和网络架构。有证据表明,适当配置的远程工作站在提高放射科医生满意度和工作效率的同时,还能保持相当于医院阅览室的诊断性能。我们发现,65%的放射科医生报告在家工作时压力水平有所降低,96%的人报告周转时间相似或有所改善。基本技术规范包括显示亮度标准,环境照明水平在25至75勒克斯之间,声学条件低于40分贝,温度控制在20-24°C。计算需求包括50- 100mbps的最小持续带宽。我们回顾了支持分布式阅读环境的多层安全架构和工作流集成策略。我们的综述得出结论,适当实施家庭远程放射学是一种可行的实践模式,在促进放射科医生福祉的同时,扩展了跨越地理边界的专业知识。然而,在技术标准化、监管协调和长期临床结果方面仍然存在知识差距,这突出表明需要进一步研究,以支持自信的、数据驱动的远程放射学实施。关键相关性声明:本综述批判性地评估了家庭远程放射学的技术、人体工程学和操作要求,提供了基于证据的建议,以解决当前的实践差距,并支持现代临床放射学中可持续、高性能远程阅读环境的发展。重点:家庭远程放射学在保持诊断质量的同时提高放射科医生的幸福感;65%的人表示压力减轻了,96%的人表示类似或改善了报告周转时间。最佳实现需要医疗级显示器、受控环境(25-75勒克斯照明)、50-100 Mbps带宽和强大的安全措施。标准化在不同的司法管辖区有所不同;一些国家有相关协议,但在跨境远程放射学和长期结果评估方面仍然存在差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Technical requirements and optimization strategies for home-based teleradiology workstations: a review article.

Technical requirements and optimization strategies for home-based teleradiology workstations: a review article.

Technical requirements and optimization strategies for home-based teleradiology workstations: a review article.

Technical requirements and optimization strategies for home-based teleradiology workstations: a review article.

Teleradiology has advanced from an occasional modality to a cornerstone of modern radiology practice, with the COVID-19 pandemic catalyzing widespread adoption of home-based reading environments. This review synthesizes current literature and expert recommendations on hardware and software optimization for effective home-based teleradiology implementation. Available data indicate 65% of institutions established home workstations during the pandemic, with 74% transitioning routine daytime shifts to internal teleradiology. We reviewed key components of successful remote reading environments, including diagnostic display specifications, environmental controls, ergonomic considerations, computational infrastructure, and network architecture. Evidence suggests that properly configured remote workstations maintain diagnostic performance equivalent to hospital reading rooms while enhancing radiologist satisfaction and productivity. We found that 65% of radiologists reported reduced stress levels when working from home, and 96% observed similar or improved report turnaround times. Essential technical specifications include display luminance standards, ambient lighting levels between 25 and 75 lux, acoustic conditions below 40 decibels, and temperature control within 20-24 °C. Computational requirements include a minimum sustained bandwidth of 50-100 Mbps. We review multi-layered security architectures and workflow integration strategies supporting distributed reading environments. Our review concludes that properly implemented home-based teleradiology is a viable practice model extending specialized expertise across geographic boundaries while promoting radiologist well-being. However, knowledge gaps remain in technical standardization, regulatory harmonization, and long-term clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for further research to support confident, data-driven teleradiology implementation. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This review critically evaluates the technical, ergonomic, and operational requirements for home-based teleradiology, offering evidence-based recommendations that address current practice gaps and support the development of sustainable, high-performance remote reading environments in modern clinical radiology. KEY POINTS: Home teleradiology maintains diagnostic quality while improving radiologist well-being; 65% report reduced stress and 96% show similar or improved report turnaround times. Optimal implementation requires medical-grade displays, a controlled environment (25-75 lux lighting), 50-100 Mbps bandwidth, and robust security measures. Standardization varies across jurisdictions; some countries have protocols, but gaps persist in cross-border teleradiology and long-term outcomes assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信