利用聚类分析定量表征第四纪冰川-河流含水层非均匀性。

IF 2.3 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hydrogeology Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-02 DOI:10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z
Felipe Gallardo Ceron, Landis Jared West, Ian T Burke, James Graham, Luca Colombera
{"title":"利用聚类分析定量表征第四纪冰川-河流含水层非均匀性。","authors":"Felipe Gallardo Ceron, Landis Jared West, Ian T Burke, James Graham, Luca Colombera","doi":"10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hydrogeological modelling requires the characterisation of hydrofacies and the representation of their spatial distribution. In this work, a workflow was developed to characterise heterogeneous unconsolidated glaciofluvial sediments in Northwest Cumbria (UK), which involved: (1) field sampling; (2) lithofacies classification; (3) in situ porosity measurements using the sand-replacement method; (4) determination of the particle size distribution (PSD); (5) hydrofacies definition via K-means cluster analysis using PSD data; (6) evaluation of empirical equations for predicting porosity using field measurements and regression analysis; and (7) estimation of hydraulic conductivity (<i>K</i>) using the Kozeny-Carman equation. Nine lithofacies were identified, including glaciofluvial silts, sands and gravels, and local till deposits. Three clusters were defined on the basis of PSD: fine-dominated (cluster-1), sand-dominated (cluster-2) and gravel-dominated (cluster-3). Cluster-1 exhibited the highest porosities (average 44%); cluster-2 showed intermediate to high porosities, with an average porosity of 40%; and cluster-3 had the lowest porosities (average 27%). The logarithm of <i>d</i> <sub>50</sub> was the parameter with the highest correlation with measured porosities (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> of 0.789). <i>K</i> values estimated using the Kozeny-Carman equation ranged between 0.06 and 0.2 m/d for cluster-1, 0.2-11 m/d for cluster 2, and 0.1-62 m/d for cluster 3. Measured porosities were higher than previously reported, while estimated <i>K</i> values were consistent with those from hydraulic tests. Comparison between lithofacies and clustering classification suggests that, for hydrofacies classification, the unsupervised cluster analysis approach is able to generate a classification that captures the hydrogeologically important details without creating an excessive number of categories.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z.</p>","PeriodicalId":13013,"journal":{"name":"Hydrogeology Journal","volume":"33 5","pages":"1237-1258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative characterisation of Quaternary glaciofluvial aquifer heterogeneity using cluster analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Felipe Gallardo Ceron, Landis Jared West, Ian T Burke, James Graham, Luca Colombera\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hydrogeological modelling requires the characterisation of hydrofacies and the representation of their spatial distribution. In this work, a workflow was developed to characterise heterogeneous unconsolidated glaciofluvial sediments in Northwest Cumbria (UK), which involved: (1) field sampling; (2) lithofacies classification; (3) in situ porosity measurements using the sand-replacement method; (4) determination of the particle size distribution (PSD); (5) hydrofacies definition via K-means cluster analysis using PSD data; (6) evaluation of empirical equations for predicting porosity using field measurements and regression analysis; and (7) estimation of hydraulic conductivity (<i>K</i>) using the Kozeny-Carman equation. Nine lithofacies were identified, including glaciofluvial silts, sands and gravels, and local till deposits. Three clusters were defined on the basis of PSD: fine-dominated (cluster-1), sand-dominated (cluster-2) and gravel-dominated (cluster-3). Cluster-1 exhibited the highest porosities (average 44%); cluster-2 showed intermediate to high porosities, with an average porosity of 40%; and cluster-3 had the lowest porosities (average 27%). The logarithm of <i>d</i> <sub>50</sub> was the parameter with the highest correlation with measured porosities (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> of 0.789). <i>K</i> values estimated using the Kozeny-Carman equation ranged between 0.06 and 0.2 m/d for cluster-1, 0.2-11 m/d for cluster 2, and 0.1-62 m/d for cluster 3. Measured porosities were higher than previously reported, while estimated <i>K</i> values were consistent with those from hydraulic tests. Comparison between lithofacies and clustering classification suggests that, for hydrofacies classification, the unsupervised cluster analysis approach is able to generate a classification that captures the hydrogeologically important details without creating an excessive number of categories.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrogeology Journal\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"1237-1258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436504/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrogeology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrogeology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水文地质建模需要确定水文相的特征及其空间分布。在这项工作中,开发了一个工作流程来表征坎布里亚郡西北部(英国)的非均质松散冰川河流沉积物,其中包括:(1)野外采样;(2)岩相分类;(3)采用换砂法进行现场孔隙度测量;(4)测定粒径分布(PSD);(5)利用PSD数据进行K-means聚类分析确定水相;(6)利用实测数据和回归分析对孔隙度预测的经验方程进行评价;(7)利用Kozeny-Carman方程估算水力导率(K)。确定了9种岩相,包括冰川河流粉砂岩相、砂砾石岩相和局部泥质沉积岩相。根据PSD定义了三个簇:细粒为主(簇1),砂质为主(簇2)和砾石为主(簇3)。簇1孔隙率最高(平均44%);簇2为中高孔隙度,平均孔隙度为40%;簇3的孔隙率最低(平均为27%)。与实测孔隙度相关性最高的参数是d50的对数(r2 = 0.789)。使用Kozeny-Carman方程估计的K值在集群1的0.06 - 0.2 m/d之间,集群2的0.2-11 m/d之间,集群3的0.1-62 m/d之间。测量的孔隙率高于先前的报道,而估计的K值与水力试验的结果一致。岩相分类和聚类分类的比较表明,对于水相分类,无监督聚类分析方法能够产生一种能够捕获水文地质重要细节的分类,而不会产生过多的类别。补充资料:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative characterisation of Quaternary glaciofluvial aquifer heterogeneity using cluster analysis.

Hydrogeological modelling requires the characterisation of hydrofacies and the representation of their spatial distribution. In this work, a workflow was developed to characterise heterogeneous unconsolidated glaciofluvial sediments in Northwest Cumbria (UK), which involved: (1) field sampling; (2) lithofacies classification; (3) in situ porosity measurements using the sand-replacement method; (4) determination of the particle size distribution (PSD); (5) hydrofacies definition via K-means cluster analysis using PSD data; (6) evaluation of empirical equations for predicting porosity using field measurements and regression analysis; and (7) estimation of hydraulic conductivity (K) using the Kozeny-Carman equation. Nine lithofacies were identified, including glaciofluvial silts, sands and gravels, and local till deposits. Three clusters were defined on the basis of PSD: fine-dominated (cluster-1), sand-dominated (cluster-2) and gravel-dominated (cluster-3). Cluster-1 exhibited the highest porosities (average 44%); cluster-2 showed intermediate to high porosities, with an average porosity of 40%; and cluster-3 had the lowest porosities (average 27%). The logarithm of d 50 was the parameter with the highest correlation with measured porosities (R 2 of 0.789). K values estimated using the Kozeny-Carman equation ranged between 0.06 and 0.2 m/d for cluster-1, 0.2-11 m/d for cluster 2, and 0.1-62 m/d for cluster 3. Measured porosities were higher than previously reported, while estimated K values were consistent with those from hydraulic tests. Comparison between lithofacies and clustering classification suggests that, for hydrofacies classification, the unsupervised cluster analysis approach is able to generate a classification that captures the hydrogeologically important details without creating an excessive number of categories.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrogeology Journal
Hydrogeology Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Hydrogeology Journal was founded in 1992 to foster understanding of hydrogeology; to describe worldwide progress in hydrogeology; and to provide an accessible forum for scientists, researchers, engineers, and practitioners in developing and industrialized countries. Since then, the journal has earned a large worldwide readership. Its peer-reviewed research articles integrate subsurface hydrology and geology with supporting disciplines: geochemistry, geophysics, geomorphology, geobiology, surface-water hydrology, tectonics, numerical modeling, economics, and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信