Felipe Gallardo Ceron, Landis Jared West, Ian T Burke, James Graham, Luca Colombera
{"title":"利用聚类分析定量表征第四纪冰川-河流含水层非均匀性。","authors":"Felipe Gallardo Ceron, Landis Jared West, Ian T Burke, James Graham, Luca Colombera","doi":"10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hydrogeological modelling requires the characterisation of hydrofacies and the representation of their spatial distribution. In this work, a workflow was developed to characterise heterogeneous unconsolidated glaciofluvial sediments in Northwest Cumbria (UK), which involved: (1) field sampling; (2) lithofacies classification; (3) in situ porosity measurements using the sand-replacement method; (4) determination of the particle size distribution (PSD); (5) hydrofacies definition via K-means cluster analysis using PSD data; (6) evaluation of empirical equations for predicting porosity using field measurements and regression analysis; and (7) estimation of hydraulic conductivity (<i>K</i>) using the Kozeny-Carman equation. Nine lithofacies were identified, including glaciofluvial silts, sands and gravels, and local till deposits. Three clusters were defined on the basis of PSD: fine-dominated (cluster-1), sand-dominated (cluster-2) and gravel-dominated (cluster-3). Cluster-1 exhibited the highest porosities (average 44%); cluster-2 showed intermediate to high porosities, with an average porosity of 40%; and cluster-3 had the lowest porosities (average 27%). The logarithm of <i>d</i> <sub>50</sub> was the parameter with the highest correlation with measured porosities (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> of 0.789). <i>K</i> values estimated using the Kozeny-Carman equation ranged between 0.06 and 0.2 m/d for cluster-1, 0.2-11 m/d for cluster 2, and 0.1-62 m/d for cluster 3. Measured porosities were higher than previously reported, while estimated <i>K</i> values were consistent with those from hydraulic tests. Comparison between lithofacies and clustering classification suggests that, for hydrofacies classification, the unsupervised cluster analysis approach is able to generate a classification that captures the hydrogeologically important details without creating an excessive number of categories.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z.</p>","PeriodicalId":13013,"journal":{"name":"Hydrogeology Journal","volume":"33 5","pages":"1237-1258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative characterisation of Quaternary glaciofluvial aquifer heterogeneity using cluster analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Felipe Gallardo Ceron, Landis Jared West, Ian T Burke, James Graham, Luca Colombera\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hydrogeological modelling requires the characterisation of hydrofacies and the representation of their spatial distribution. In this work, a workflow was developed to characterise heterogeneous unconsolidated glaciofluvial sediments in Northwest Cumbria (UK), which involved: (1) field sampling; (2) lithofacies classification; (3) in situ porosity measurements using the sand-replacement method; (4) determination of the particle size distribution (PSD); (5) hydrofacies definition via K-means cluster analysis using PSD data; (6) evaluation of empirical equations for predicting porosity using field measurements and regression analysis; and (7) estimation of hydraulic conductivity (<i>K</i>) using the Kozeny-Carman equation. Nine lithofacies were identified, including glaciofluvial silts, sands and gravels, and local till deposits. Three clusters were defined on the basis of PSD: fine-dominated (cluster-1), sand-dominated (cluster-2) and gravel-dominated (cluster-3). Cluster-1 exhibited the highest porosities (average 44%); cluster-2 showed intermediate to high porosities, with an average porosity of 40%; and cluster-3 had the lowest porosities (average 27%). The logarithm of <i>d</i> <sub>50</sub> was the parameter with the highest correlation with measured porosities (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> of 0.789). <i>K</i> values estimated using the Kozeny-Carman equation ranged between 0.06 and 0.2 m/d for cluster-1, 0.2-11 m/d for cluster 2, and 0.1-62 m/d for cluster 3. Measured porosities were higher than previously reported, while estimated <i>K</i> values were consistent with those from hydraulic tests. Comparison between lithofacies and clustering classification suggests that, for hydrofacies classification, the unsupervised cluster analysis approach is able to generate a classification that captures the hydrogeologically important details without creating an excessive number of categories.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrogeology Journal\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"1237-1258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436504/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrogeology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrogeology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantitative characterisation of Quaternary glaciofluvial aquifer heterogeneity using cluster analysis.
Hydrogeological modelling requires the characterisation of hydrofacies and the representation of their spatial distribution. In this work, a workflow was developed to characterise heterogeneous unconsolidated glaciofluvial sediments in Northwest Cumbria (UK), which involved: (1) field sampling; (2) lithofacies classification; (3) in situ porosity measurements using the sand-replacement method; (4) determination of the particle size distribution (PSD); (5) hydrofacies definition via K-means cluster analysis using PSD data; (6) evaluation of empirical equations for predicting porosity using field measurements and regression analysis; and (7) estimation of hydraulic conductivity (K) using the Kozeny-Carman equation. Nine lithofacies were identified, including glaciofluvial silts, sands and gravels, and local till deposits. Three clusters were defined on the basis of PSD: fine-dominated (cluster-1), sand-dominated (cluster-2) and gravel-dominated (cluster-3). Cluster-1 exhibited the highest porosities (average 44%); cluster-2 showed intermediate to high porosities, with an average porosity of 40%; and cluster-3 had the lowest porosities (average 27%). The logarithm of d50 was the parameter with the highest correlation with measured porosities (R2 of 0.789). K values estimated using the Kozeny-Carman equation ranged between 0.06 and 0.2 m/d for cluster-1, 0.2-11 m/d for cluster 2, and 0.1-62 m/d for cluster 3. Measured porosities were higher than previously reported, while estimated K values were consistent with those from hydraulic tests. Comparison between lithofacies and clustering classification suggests that, for hydrofacies classification, the unsupervised cluster analysis approach is able to generate a classification that captures the hydrogeologically important details without creating an excessive number of categories.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10040-025-02933-z.
期刊介绍:
Hydrogeology Journal was founded in 1992 to foster understanding of hydrogeology; to describe worldwide progress in hydrogeology; and to provide an accessible forum for scientists, researchers, engineers, and practitioners in developing and industrialized countries.
Since then, the journal has earned a large worldwide readership. Its peer-reviewed research articles integrate subsurface hydrology and geology with supporting disciplines: geochemistry, geophysics, geomorphology, geobiology, surface-water hydrology, tectonics, numerical modeling, economics, and sociology.