评估针对审计产生的围产期护理改进的量身定制的实施战略。

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ien van der Woerdt-Eltink, Andrea Drost, Gera Welker, Ageeth Rosman, Jan Jaap Erwich, Esteriek de Miranda
{"title":"评估针对审计产生的围产期护理改进的量身定制的实施战略。","authors":"Ien van der Woerdt-Eltink, Andrea Drost, Gera Welker, Ageeth Rosman, Jan Jaap Erwich, Esteriek de Miranda","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perinatal audit identifies substandard factors in perinatal care for quality improvement of care. However, not all identified improvement objectives achieve effective implementation. The ACTion method, using a 7-step Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, was developed for local perinatal care professionals to enhance tailored implementation by interactive learning, training and coaching of implementation and behaviour change principles.This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the ACTion method within all perinatal cooperation groups (PCGs) in the northern region of the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods design was used for effect and process evaluation. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were applied to analyse participants' knowledge; skills; motivation; and the number, nature and implementation stage of improvement objectives. Additionally, influencing factors were examined through inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A multidisciplinary ACTion team was formed in all 11 PCGs. From the initially 93 participating ACTion team members, 86% completed the full training.Knowledge and skills after implementation of the ACTion method improved significantly, with mean scores increasing from 2.53 to 3.70 on a 1-5 Likert scale (p<0.001, r=0.9). ACTion teams addressed 3-19 improvement objectives, with implementation ranging from 14% to 67%, depending on time of start of the project and influencing factors. In total, 98 improvement objectives were addressed, of which 46 (47%) were fully implemented and secured. As emerged from interviews, a proactive key person and ongoing coaching during the follow-up phase were instrumental in driving these efforts. The multidisciplinary approach and collaborative efforts in regional obstetric care enhanced mutual understanding and cooperation across disciplines. Impeding factors included limited time, manpower and lack of commitment within the PCG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A locally tailored approach, involving interactive learning, training and coaching in the ACTion method, provides a valuable framework for implementing audit-driven improvement objectives in maternal and perinatal care, while simultaneously fostering interprofessional cooperation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a tailored implementation strategy for audit-generated improvements in perinatal care.\",\"authors\":\"Ien van der Woerdt-Eltink, Andrea Drost, Gera Welker, Ageeth Rosman, Jan Jaap Erwich, Esteriek de Miranda\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perinatal audit identifies substandard factors in perinatal care for quality improvement of care. However, not all identified improvement objectives achieve effective implementation. The ACTion method, using a 7-step Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, was developed for local perinatal care professionals to enhance tailored implementation by interactive learning, training and coaching of implementation and behaviour change principles.This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the ACTion method within all perinatal cooperation groups (PCGs) in the northern region of the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods design was used for effect and process evaluation. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were applied to analyse participants' knowledge; skills; motivation; and the number, nature and implementation stage of improvement objectives. Additionally, influencing factors were examined through inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A multidisciplinary ACTion team was formed in all 11 PCGs. From the initially 93 participating ACTion team members, 86% completed the full training.Knowledge and skills after implementation of the ACTion method improved significantly, with mean scores increasing from 2.53 to 3.70 on a 1-5 Likert scale (p<0.001, r=0.9). ACTion teams addressed 3-19 improvement objectives, with implementation ranging from 14% to 67%, depending on time of start of the project and influencing factors. In total, 98 improvement objectives were addressed, of which 46 (47%) were fully implemented and secured. As emerged from interviews, a proactive key person and ongoing coaching during the follow-up phase were instrumental in driving these efforts. The multidisciplinary approach and collaborative efforts in regional obstetric care enhanced mutual understanding and cooperation across disciplines. Impeding factors included limited time, manpower and lack of commitment within the PCG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A locally tailored approach, involving interactive learning, training and coaching in the ACTion method, provides a valuable framework for implementing audit-driven improvement objectives in maternal and perinatal care, while simultaneously fostering interprofessional cooperation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443171/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:围产期审计识别围产期护理的不合格因素,以提高护理质量。然而,并不是所有确定的改进目标都能得到有效的实施。行动方法采用7步计划-执行-检查-行动循环,为当地围产期护理专业人员制定,通过互动式学习、培训和指导实施和行为改变原则,加强量身定制的实施。本研究旨在评估行动方法在荷兰北部地区所有围产期合作小组(pcg)中的有效性。方法:采用混合方法设计进行效果和工艺评价。采用描述性和推理性统计方法对被试的知识进行分析;技能;动机;改进目标的数量、性质和实施阶段。此外,通过归纳主题分析,探讨了影响因素。结果:11个PCGs均组成了多学科行动小组。在最初的93名参与行动的团队成员中,86%完成了完整的培训。实施ACTion方法后,知识和技能显著提高,在1-5李克特量表上的平均得分从2.53提高到3.70。(结论:一种针对当地的方法,包括交互式学习、培训和指导,为实施审计驱动的孕产妇和围产期护理改进目标提供了一个有价值的框架,同时促进了专业间的合作。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of a tailored implementation strategy for audit-generated improvements in perinatal care.

Evaluation of a tailored implementation strategy for audit-generated improvements in perinatal care.

Evaluation of a tailored implementation strategy for audit-generated improvements in perinatal care.

Background: Perinatal audit identifies substandard factors in perinatal care for quality improvement of care. However, not all identified improvement objectives achieve effective implementation. The ACTion method, using a 7-step Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, was developed for local perinatal care professionals to enhance tailored implementation by interactive learning, training and coaching of implementation and behaviour change principles.This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the ACTion method within all perinatal cooperation groups (PCGs) in the northern region of the Netherlands.

Methods: A mixed-methods design was used for effect and process evaluation. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were applied to analyse participants' knowledge; skills; motivation; and the number, nature and implementation stage of improvement objectives. Additionally, influencing factors were examined through inductive thematic analysis.

Results: A multidisciplinary ACTion team was formed in all 11 PCGs. From the initially 93 participating ACTion team members, 86% completed the full training.Knowledge and skills after implementation of the ACTion method improved significantly, with mean scores increasing from 2.53 to 3.70 on a 1-5 Likert scale (p<0.001, r=0.9). ACTion teams addressed 3-19 improvement objectives, with implementation ranging from 14% to 67%, depending on time of start of the project and influencing factors. In total, 98 improvement objectives were addressed, of which 46 (47%) were fully implemented and secured. As emerged from interviews, a proactive key person and ongoing coaching during the follow-up phase were instrumental in driving these efforts. The multidisciplinary approach and collaborative efforts in regional obstetric care enhanced mutual understanding and cooperation across disciplines. Impeding factors included limited time, manpower and lack of commitment within the PCG.

Conclusion: A locally tailored approach, involving interactive learning, training and coaching in the ACTion method, provides a valuable framework for implementing audit-driven improvement objectives in maternal and perinatal care, while simultaneously fostering interprofessional cooperation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信