澳大利亚二级保健精神卫生服务中人格障碍的点流行调查。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Kayla R Steele, Grace Ang, Andrea Howardova, Clive Stanton
{"title":"澳大利亚二级保健精神卫生服务中人格障碍的点流行调查。","authors":"Kayla R Steele, Grace Ang, Andrea Howardova, Clive Stanton","doi":"10.1177/00048674251370088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personality disorder is often underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed in secondary care settings. This can lead to challenges in accessing appropriate care for patients, and the allocation of resources in these services.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective was to estimate the rate of personality disorder in a cohort of individuals presenting to a typical urban secondary care mental health service in Australia. The secondary objective was to compare this to the recorded rate of personality disorder diagnosis in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was completed for 376 patients (52.7% female, M = 47.26, SD = 16.99, 16-94 years). Data collected included the Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS), a standardised screening tool for Personality Disorder. Demographic and clinical data included participant age, gender, location, presenting problem, diagnosis, and mortality. Statistical analyses included univariate analyses and the χ<sup>2</sup> test of independence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the entire sample, 289 participants (76.86%) completed the screening tool, with 214 participants (56.91%) meeting caseness for personality disorder. Comparatively, only 13 participants (3.46%) had a personality disorder diagnosis listed on their electronic medical records. The estimated rate of personality disorder was 16.46 times greater than the recorded rate of personality disorder diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Estimated rate of personality disorder using a brief screening tool was found to be very high in a large urban Australian secondary care mental health service. However, the recorded rate in the same service was found to be very low. The discrepancy found between estimated and recorded rates have potential implications for access to appropriate care and resource allocation in this setting. The results suggest health professionals may benefit from further education and training in the identification and clinical assessment of personality disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"48674251370088"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A point prevalence survey of personality disorder in an Australian secondary care mental health service.\",\"authors\":\"Kayla R Steele, Grace Ang, Andrea Howardova, Clive Stanton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00048674251370088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personality disorder is often underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed in secondary care settings. This can lead to challenges in accessing appropriate care for patients, and the allocation of resources in these services.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective was to estimate the rate of personality disorder in a cohort of individuals presenting to a typical urban secondary care mental health service in Australia. The secondary objective was to compare this to the recorded rate of personality disorder diagnosis in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was completed for 376 patients (52.7% female, M = 47.26, SD = 16.99, 16-94 years). Data collected included the Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS), a standardised screening tool for Personality Disorder. Demographic and clinical data included participant age, gender, location, presenting problem, diagnosis, and mortality. Statistical analyses included univariate analyses and the χ<sup>2</sup> test of independence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the entire sample, 289 participants (76.86%) completed the screening tool, with 214 participants (56.91%) meeting caseness for personality disorder. Comparatively, only 13 participants (3.46%) had a personality disorder diagnosis listed on their electronic medical records. The estimated rate of personality disorder was 16.46 times greater than the recorded rate of personality disorder diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Estimated rate of personality disorder using a brief screening tool was found to be very high in a large urban Australian secondary care mental health service. However, the recorded rate in the same service was found to be very low. The discrepancy found between estimated and recorded rates have potential implications for access to appropriate care and resource allocation in this setting. The results suggest health professionals may benefit from further education and training in the identification and clinical assessment of personality disorder.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"48674251370088\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674251370088\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674251370088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在二级医疗机构中,人格障碍经常被低估或误诊。这可能导致在为患者提供适当护理以及在这些服务中分配资源方面面临挑战。目的:主要目的是估计在澳大利亚一个典型的城市二级保健精神卫生服务的个体队列中人格障碍的发生率。次要目的是比较这与记录的人格障碍诊断率在这种情况下。方法:对376例患者进行回顾性图表分析,其中女性52.7%,M = 47.26, SD = 16.99,年龄16 ~ 94岁。收集的数据包括人格标准化评估-简化量表(SAPAS),这是一种人格障碍的标准化筛选工具。人口统计学和临床数据包括参与者的年龄、性别、地点、出现的问题、诊断和死亡率。统计分析包括单因素分析和χ2独立性检验。结果:289名参与者(76.86%)完成了筛查工具,214名参与者(56.91%)符合人格障碍病例。相比之下,只有13名参与者(3.46%)的电子病历上列出了人格障碍诊断。估计的人格障碍率是记录的人格障碍诊断率的16.46倍。结论:在澳大利亚一个大城市的二级保健精神卫生服务机构中,使用一种简短的筛查工具估计的人格障碍率非常高。然而,在相同的服务中,记录的比率被发现非常低。在这种情况下,估计率和记录率之间的差异对获得适当护理和资源分配具有潜在影响。研究结果表明,在人格障碍的识别和临床评估方面,卫生专业人员可能会从进一步的教育和培训中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A point prevalence survey of personality disorder in an Australian secondary care mental health service.

Background: Personality disorder is often underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed in secondary care settings. This can lead to challenges in accessing appropriate care for patients, and the allocation of resources in these services.

Objectives: The primary objective was to estimate the rate of personality disorder in a cohort of individuals presenting to a typical urban secondary care mental health service in Australia. The secondary objective was to compare this to the recorded rate of personality disorder diagnosis in this setting.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was completed for 376 patients (52.7% female, M = 47.26, SD = 16.99, 16-94 years). Data collected included the Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS), a standardised screening tool for Personality Disorder. Demographic and clinical data included participant age, gender, location, presenting problem, diagnosis, and mortality. Statistical analyses included univariate analyses and the χ2 test of independence.

Results: Of the entire sample, 289 participants (76.86%) completed the screening tool, with 214 participants (56.91%) meeting caseness for personality disorder. Comparatively, only 13 participants (3.46%) had a personality disorder diagnosis listed on their electronic medical records. The estimated rate of personality disorder was 16.46 times greater than the recorded rate of personality disorder diagnosis.

Conclusion: Estimated rate of personality disorder using a brief screening tool was found to be very high in a large urban Australian secondary care mental health service. However, the recorded rate in the same service was found to be very low. The discrepancy found between estimated and recorded rates have potential implications for access to appropriate care and resource allocation in this setting. The results suggest health professionals may benefit from further education and training in the identification and clinical assessment of personality disorder.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the official Journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP). The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is a monthly journal publishing original articles which describe research or report opinions of interest to psychiatrists. These contributions may be presented as original research, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and letters to the editor. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the leading psychiatry journal of the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信