Thomas P Lodise, Jae Min, Brian H Nathanson, Emre Yücel
{"title":"头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦与多粘菌素治疗耐多药铜绿假单胞菌(PUMA)所致肺炎的比较","authors":"Thomas P Lodise, Jae Min, Brian H Nathanson, Emre Yücel","doi":"10.1128/aac.00569-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ceftolozane/tazobactam and polymyxin-based regimens are frequently used to treat pneumonia caused by multi-drug-resistant <i>P. aeruginosa</i> (MDR-PSA). However, comparative data on global clinical outcomes between these therapies are limited. A multi-centered observational study was performed using the PINC AI<sup>TM</sup> Healthcare Database (2016-2022). The study population included hospitalized patients ≥ 18 years who were diagnosed with pneumonia and had MDR-PSA (defined as non-susceptible to ≥1 agent in ≥3 antimicrobial categories) on a respiratory or blood culture, receipt of ceftolozane/tazobactam or a polymyxin-based regimen within 3 days of index MDR-PSA culture, receipt of ≥2 days of ceftolozane/tazobactam or a polymyxin-based regimen, and without a COVID-19 diagnosis. A Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) analysis was performed. Components of the DOOR included in-hospital mortality, discharge destination (home vs other), recurrent MDR-PSA pneumonia, receipt of any renal replacement therapy (RRT) post-index culture in RRT-naive patients, and 30-day pneumonia-related readmissions. In total, 186 patients met the study criteria (104 ceftolozane/tazobactam and 82 polymyxin). In the IPW-adjusted DOOR analysis, a ceftolozane/tazobactam-treated patient had a higher probability of a more favorable outcome (DOOR probability: 61.3%; 95% CI: 56.8%, 65.7%). In the DOOR partial credit analyses, a ceftolozane/tazobactam-treated patient had a higher probability of being discharged home alive with no undesirable outcomes than a polymyxin-treated patient (20.2% vs 9.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.04). This real-world evidence study of non-COVID-19 patients with MDR-PSA pneumonia suggests that patients treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam have a higher probability of a more favorable outcome compared with patients treated with a polymyxin-based regimen. Further large-scale studies with detailed dosing are needed to validate the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"e0056925"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of early treatment with ceftolozane/tazobactam versus polymyxin-based therapy of pneumonia due to MDR <i>Pseudomonas</i> <i>aeruginosa</i> (PUMA).\",\"authors\":\"Thomas P Lodise, Jae Min, Brian H Nathanson, Emre Yücel\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/aac.00569-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ceftolozane/tazobactam and polymyxin-based regimens are frequently used to treat pneumonia caused by multi-drug-resistant <i>P. aeruginosa</i> (MDR-PSA). However, comparative data on global clinical outcomes between these therapies are limited. A multi-centered observational study was performed using the PINC AI<sup>TM</sup> Healthcare Database (2016-2022). The study population included hospitalized patients ≥ 18 years who were diagnosed with pneumonia and had MDR-PSA (defined as non-susceptible to ≥1 agent in ≥3 antimicrobial categories) on a respiratory or blood culture, receipt of ceftolozane/tazobactam or a polymyxin-based regimen within 3 days of index MDR-PSA culture, receipt of ≥2 days of ceftolozane/tazobactam or a polymyxin-based regimen, and without a COVID-19 diagnosis. A Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) analysis was performed. Components of the DOOR included in-hospital mortality, discharge destination (home vs other), recurrent MDR-PSA pneumonia, receipt of any renal replacement therapy (RRT) post-index culture in RRT-naive patients, and 30-day pneumonia-related readmissions. In total, 186 patients met the study criteria (104 ceftolozane/tazobactam and 82 polymyxin). In the IPW-adjusted DOOR analysis, a ceftolozane/tazobactam-treated patient had a higher probability of a more favorable outcome (DOOR probability: 61.3%; 95% CI: 56.8%, 65.7%). In the DOOR partial credit analyses, a ceftolozane/tazobactam-treated patient had a higher probability of being discharged home alive with no undesirable outcomes than a polymyxin-treated patient (20.2% vs 9.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.04). This real-world evidence study of non-COVID-19 patients with MDR-PSA pneumonia suggests that patients treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam have a higher probability of a more favorable outcome compared with patients treated with a polymyxin-based regimen. Further large-scale studies with detailed dosing are needed to validate the findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0056925\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00569-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00569-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦和以多粘菌素为基础的方案经常用于治疗多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌(MDR-PSA)引起的肺炎。然而,这些疗法之间全球临床结果的比较数据是有限的。使用PINC AITM医疗数据库(2016-2022)进行多中心观察性研究。研究人群包括≥18岁的住院患者,诊断为肺炎,耐多药psa(定义为对≥3种抗菌药物类别中≥1种药物不敏感)进行呼吸或血液培养,在指数耐多药psa培养后3天内接受头孢洛桑/他唑巴坦或基于多粘菌素的方案,接受头孢洛桑/他唑巴坦或基于多粘菌素的方案≥2天,未诊断为COVID-19。进行结果排序的可取性(Desirability of outcomes Ranking, DOOR)分析。DOOR的组成部分包括住院死亡率、出院目的地(家庭与其他)、复发性耐多药- psa肺炎、未接受肾替代治疗(RRT)的患者在指数培养后接受任何肾替代治疗(RRT),以及30天肺炎相关再入院。共有186例患者符合研究标准(头孢唑嗪/他唑巴坦104例,多粘菌素82例)。在ipw校正后的DOOR分析中,头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦治疗的患者更有可能获得更有利的结果(DOOR概率:61.3%;95% CI: 56.8%, 65.7%)。在DOOR部分信用分析中,头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦治疗的患者比多粘菌素治疗的患者活着出院回家的可能性更高(20.2% vs 9.8%, P = 0.04)。这项针对非covid -19耐多药psa肺炎患者的真实证据研究表明,与接受多粘菌素治疗的患者相比,接受头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦治疗的患者更有可能获得更有利的结果。需要进一步的大规模研究和详细的剂量来验证这些发现。
Comparison of early treatment with ceftolozane/tazobactam versus polymyxin-based therapy of pneumonia due to MDR Pseudomonasaeruginosa (PUMA).
Ceftolozane/tazobactam and polymyxin-based regimens are frequently used to treat pneumonia caused by multi-drug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDR-PSA). However, comparative data on global clinical outcomes between these therapies are limited. A multi-centered observational study was performed using the PINC AITM Healthcare Database (2016-2022). The study population included hospitalized patients ≥ 18 years who were diagnosed with pneumonia and had MDR-PSA (defined as non-susceptible to ≥1 agent in ≥3 antimicrobial categories) on a respiratory or blood culture, receipt of ceftolozane/tazobactam or a polymyxin-based regimen within 3 days of index MDR-PSA culture, receipt of ≥2 days of ceftolozane/tazobactam or a polymyxin-based regimen, and without a COVID-19 diagnosis. A Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) analysis was performed. Components of the DOOR included in-hospital mortality, discharge destination (home vs other), recurrent MDR-PSA pneumonia, receipt of any renal replacement therapy (RRT) post-index culture in RRT-naive patients, and 30-day pneumonia-related readmissions. In total, 186 patients met the study criteria (104 ceftolozane/tazobactam and 82 polymyxin). In the IPW-adjusted DOOR analysis, a ceftolozane/tazobactam-treated patient had a higher probability of a more favorable outcome (DOOR probability: 61.3%; 95% CI: 56.8%, 65.7%). In the DOOR partial credit analyses, a ceftolozane/tazobactam-treated patient had a higher probability of being discharged home alive with no undesirable outcomes than a polymyxin-treated patient (20.2% vs 9.8%, P = 0.04). This real-world evidence study of non-COVID-19 patients with MDR-PSA pneumonia suggests that patients treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam have a higher probability of a more favorable outcome compared with patients treated with a polymyxin-based regimen. Further large-scale studies with detailed dosing are needed to validate the findings.
期刊介绍:
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.