当地社区对生态系统服务利用的看法——对肯尼亚卡卡梅加森林可持续管理的影响

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Ibrahim Osewe, Claudiu Coman, Aureliu-Florin Hălălișan, Erick O. Osewe, Leila Ndalilo, Joram K. Kagombe, Ioan Vasile Abrudan, Bogdan Popa
{"title":"当地社区对生态系统服务利用的看法——对肯尼亚卡卡梅加森林可持续管理的影响","authors":"Ibrahim Osewe,&nbsp;Claudiu Coman,&nbsp;Aureliu-Florin Hălălișan,&nbsp;Erick O. Osewe,&nbsp;Leila Ndalilo,&nbsp;Joram K. Kagombe,&nbsp;Ioan Vasile Abrudan,&nbsp;Bogdan Popa","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01320-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forests play a vital role in supporting local livelihoods by providing resources and services that underpin cultural, economic, and social well-being. In Kenya’s Kakamega rainforest, participatory forest management is challenged by population pressures, yet the impact of ecosystem service (ES) flows on local communities remains insufficiently understood. This study examined how communities perceive and use forest ES and how these perceptions vary across socio-economic groups. We used a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative data (17 key informant interviews, 8 focus group discussions) and quantitative data (surveys of 453 households). Statistical analyses (Kruskal–Wallis, Chi-square, Mann–Whitney U, ANOVA) revealed 20 recognized ES, with firewood identified as the most critical (acknowledged by 86% of respondents). Provisioning ES were mainly used for domestic purposes, particularly by male respondents and individuals aged 36–48. Wealthier households placed greater value on cultural ES and associated them strongly with natural forests (2 out of 4). Significant differences in ES importance, use, and supporting land-use types were observed across wealth, age, and gender groups. These findings highlight the importance of management strategies that incorporate diverse community perspectives and promote the equitable and sustainable use of forest resources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-025-01320-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local community perceptions on ecosystem services utilisation—implications for sustainable management of Kakamega Forest in Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Ibrahim Osewe,&nbsp;Claudiu Coman,&nbsp;Aureliu-Florin Hălălișan,&nbsp;Erick O. Osewe,&nbsp;Leila Ndalilo,&nbsp;Joram K. Kagombe,&nbsp;Ioan Vasile Abrudan,&nbsp;Bogdan Popa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10457-025-01320-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Forests play a vital role in supporting local livelihoods by providing resources and services that underpin cultural, economic, and social well-being. In Kenya’s Kakamega rainforest, participatory forest management is challenged by population pressures, yet the impact of ecosystem service (ES) flows on local communities remains insufficiently understood. This study examined how communities perceive and use forest ES and how these perceptions vary across socio-economic groups. We used a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative data (17 key informant interviews, 8 focus group discussions) and quantitative data (surveys of 453 households). Statistical analyses (Kruskal–Wallis, Chi-square, Mann–Whitney U, ANOVA) revealed 20 recognized ES, with firewood identified as the most critical (acknowledged by 86% of respondents). Provisioning ES were mainly used for domestic purposes, particularly by male respondents and individuals aged 36–48. Wealthier households placed greater value on cultural ES and associated them strongly with natural forests (2 out of 4). Significant differences in ES importance, use, and supporting land-use types were observed across wealth, age, and gender groups. These findings highlight the importance of management strategies that incorporate diverse community perspectives and promote the equitable and sustainable use of forest resources.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"volume\":\"99 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-025-01320-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01320-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01320-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

森林通过提供支撑文化、经济和社会福祉的资源和服务,在支持当地生计方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在肯尼亚的卡卡梅加雨林,参与式森林管理受到人口压力的挑战,但生态系统服务(ES)流动对当地社区的影响仍然没有得到充分的了解。这项研究调查了社区如何认识和利用森林生态系统,以及这些认识在不同社会经济群体之间的差异。我们采用混合方法,结合定性数据(17个关键信息者访谈,8个焦点小组讨论)和定量数据(453个家庭的调查)。统计分析(Kruskal-Wallis,卡方,Mann-Whitney U,方差分析)显示了20个公认的ES,其中木柴被认为是最关键的(86%的受访者承认)。提供ES主要用于家庭用途,尤其是男性受访者和36-48岁的个人。较富裕的家庭更重视文化环境,并将其与自然森林紧密联系在一起(四分之二)。在财富、年龄和性别群体中,ES的重要性、使用和支持性土地利用类型存在显著差异。这些调查结果突出了纳入不同社区观点并促进公平和可持续利用森林资源的管理战略的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Local community perceptions on ecosystem services utilisation—implications for sustainable management of Kakamega Forest in Kenya

Forests play a vital role in supporting local livelihoods by providing resources and services that underpin cultural, economic, and social well-being. In Kenya’s Kakamega rainforest, participatory forest management is challenged by population pressures, yet the impact of ecosystem service (ES) flows on local communities remains insufficiently understood. This study examined how communities perceive and use forest ES and how these perceptions vary across socio-economic groups. We used a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative data (17 key informant interviews, 8 focus group discussions) and quantitative data (surveys of 453 households). Statistical analyses (Kruskal–Wallis, Chi-square, Mann–Whitney U, ANOVA) revealed 20 recognized ES, with firewood identified as the most critical (acknowledged by 86% of respondents). Provisioning ES were mainly used for domestic purposes, particularly by male respondents and individuals aged 36–48. Wealthier households placed greater value on cultural ES and associated them strongly with natural forests (2 out of 4). Significant differences in ES importance, use, and supporting land-use types were observed across wealth, age, and gender groups. These findings highlight the importance of management strategies that incorporate diverse community perspectives and promote the equitable and sustainable use of forest resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信