Amy K Peterson,Teresa A Ukrainetz,Erin J Bush,Alisa Konishi-Therkildsen
{"title":"学生、家长和教育者对说明文干预和延续的看法的定性调查。","authors":"Amy K Peterson,Teresa A Ukrainetz,Erin J Bush,Alisa Konishi-Therkildsen","doi":"10.1044/2025_lshss-25-00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThis qualitative study explored the social validity of Sketch and Speak expository strategy intervention as it occurred within a single-case experiment and supported carryover for adolescents with language learning disabilities (LLDs).\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nFour eighth-grade students with LLD participated in a summer intervention in which they were taught to take notes, generate oral sentences, and orally practice sentences and reports to help them recall ideas from informational texts. After intervention, the adolescents, their parents, and the speech-language pathologist (SLP) who provided the intervention were interviewed. In the fall, the school SLP and three teachers designed and carried out classroom lessons using the strategies. The students and educators were then interviewed about their perceptions of the utility of the taught strategies for language intervention and curricular learning. A qualitative thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSix themes emerged from the interview data according to two groups (i.e., students and adults): (a) student awareness of the taught strategies, (b) student uncertainty about the strategies for academic use, (c) parent perceptions of intervention effects, (d) different benefits for different learners, (e) ease of strategy implementation, and (f) collaboration and school context as implementation supports.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis qualitative study revealed that adolescents with LLD, their parents, and their educators perceive Sketch and Speak strategies as helpful within treatment and classroom applications, though the students were less enthusiastic than the educators. The SLPs and teachers showed strong buy-in for the simplicity, effectiveness, and motivational effects of the strategies, even with minimal carryover training.","PeriodicalId":54326,"journal":{"name":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","volume":"16 1","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Qualitative Inquiry of Student, Parent, and Educator Perceptions of an Expository Intervention and Carryover.\",\"authors\":\"Amy K Peterson,Teresa A Ukrainetz,Erin J Bush,Alisa Konishi-Therkildsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_lshss-25-00010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nThis qualitative study explored the social validity of Sketch and Speak expository strategy intervention as it occurred within a single-case experiment and supported carryover for adolescents with language learning disabilities (LLDs).\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHOD\\r\\nFour eighth-grade students with LLD participated in a summer intervention in which they were taught to take notes, generate oral sentences, and orally practice sentences and reports to help them recall ideas from informational texts. After intervention, the adolescents, their parents, and the speech-language pathologist (SLP) who provided the intervention were interviewed. In the fall, the school SLP and three teachers designed and carried out classroom lessons using the strategies. The students and educators were then interviewed about their perceptions of the utility of the taught strategies for language intervention and curricular learning. A qualitative thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nSix themes emerged from the interview data according to two groups (i.e., students and adults): (a) student awareness of the taught strategies, (b) student uncertainty about the strategies for academic use, (c) parent perceptions of intervention effects, (d) different benefits for different learners, (e) ease of strategy implementation, and (f) collaboration and school context as implementation supports.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThis qualitative study revealed that adolescents with LLD, their parents, and their educators perceive Sketch and Speak strategies as helpful within treatment and classroom applications, though the students were less enthusiastic than the educators. The SLPs and teachers showed strong buy-in for the simplicity, effectiveness, and motivational effects of the strategies, even with minimal carryover training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_lshss-25-00010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_lshss-25-00010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Qualitative Inquiry of Student, Parent, and Educator Perceptions of an Expository Intervention and Carryover.
PURPOSE
This qualitative study explored the social validity of Sketch and Speak expository strategy intervention as it occurred within a single-case experiment and supported carryover for adolescents with language learning disabilities (LLDs).
METHOD
Four eighth-grade students with LLD participated in a summer intervention in which they were taught to take notes, generate oral sentences, and orally practice sentences and reports to help them recall ideas from informational texts. After intervention, the adolescents, their parents, and the speech-language pathologist (SLP) who provided the intervention were interviewed. In the fall, the school SLP and three teachers designed and carried out classroom lessons using the strategies. The students and educators were then interviewed about their perceptions of the utility of the taught strategies for language intervention and curricular learning. A qualitative thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews.
RESULTS
Six themes emerged from the interview data according to two groups (i.e., students and adults): (a) student awareness of the taught strategies, (b) student uncertainty about the strategies for academic use, (c) parent perceptions of intervention effects, (d) different benefits for different learners, (e) ease of strategy implementation, and (f) collaboration and school context as implementation supports.
CONCLUSIONS
This qualitative study revealed that adolescents with LLD, their parents, and their educators perceive Sketch and Speak strategies as helpful within treatment and classroom applications, though the students were less enthusiastic than the educators. The SLPs and teachers showed strong buy-in for the simplicity, effectiveness, and motivational effects of the strategies, even with minimal carryover training.
期刊介绍:
Mission: LSHSS publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to the practice of audiology and speech-language pathology in the schools, focusing on children and adolescents. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research and is designed to promote development and analysis of approaches concerning the delivery of services to the school-aged population. LSHSS seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of audiology and speech-language pathology as practiced in schools, including aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; childhood apraxia of speech; classroom acoustics; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; fluency disorders; hearing-assistive technology; language disorders; literacy disorders including reading, writing, and spelling; motor speech disorders; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; voice disorders.