{"title":"女权主义团结还是道德化的身体政治?在线遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌社区和女权主义健康政治","authors":"Linda Blum, K. J. Surkan","doi":"10.1177/08912432251374235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we extend the study of the embodied health activism of breast cancer survivors to the relatively neglected peer-to-peer groups now proliferating online. We conducted in-depth interviews during COVID-19 with individuals with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) mutations because, with heightened risk of disease, they are unusually active online. We asked participants with diverse racial-ethnic, gender, and sexual identities about online experiences to understand solidarity and activism, particularly within the context of a neoliberal emphasis on taking individual responsibility to overcome health risks. We found that (1) most reported finding solidarity and shared experiential knowledge, yet desires for positive uplift to overcome cancer led to a moralized body politics of exclusion and individualized responsibility, and (2) such boundary making, particularly over breast reconstruction, has contradictory implications with larger lessons for social movement scholars. While boundary making builds solidarity among insiders, it threatens connections to others, as was also the case with the ideological and identitarian politics that limited second-wave feminism. In our case, boundary making limits transgressive body politics, leaving a moralized body politics of heteronormative femininity.","PeriodicalId":48351,"journal":{"name":"Gender & Society","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feminist Solidarity or Moralized Body Politics? Online Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Communities and Feminist Health Politics\",\"authors\":\"Linda Blum, K. J. Surkan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08912432251374235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we extend the study of the embodied health activism of breast cancer survivors to the relatively neglected peer-to-peer groups now proliferating online. We conducted in-depth interviews during COVID-19 with individuals with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) mutations because, with heightened risk of disease, they are unusually active online. We asked participants with diverse racial-ethnic, gender, and sexual identities about online experiences to understand solidarity and activism, particularly within the context of a neoliberal emphasis on taking individual responsibility to overcome health risks. We found that (1) most reported finding solidarity and shared experiential knowledge, yet desires for positive uplift to overcome cancer led to a moralized body politics of exclusion and individualized responsibility, and (2) such boundary making, particularly over breast reconstruction, has contradictory implications with larger lessons for social movement scholars. While boundary making builds solidarity among insiders, it threatens connections to others, as was also the case with the ideological and identitarian politics that limited second-wave feminism. In our case, boundary making limits transgressive body politics, leaving a moralized body politics of heteronormative femininity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender & Society\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432251374235\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432251374235","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Feminist Solidarity or Moralized Body Politics? Online Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Communities and Feminist Health Politics
In this article, we extend the study of the embodied health activism of breast cancer survivors to the relatively neglected peer-to-peer groups now proliferating online. We conducted in-depth interviews during COVID-19 with individuals with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) mutations because, with heightened risk of disease, they are unusually active online. We asked participants with diverse racial-ethnic, gender, and sexual identities about online experiences to understand solidarity and activism, particularly within the context of a neoliberal emphasis on taking individual responsibility to overcome health risks. We found that (1) most reported finding solidarity and shared experiential knowledge, yet desires for positive uplift to overcome cancer led to a moralized body politics of exclusion and individualized responsibility, and (2) such boundary making, particularly over breast reconstruction, has contradictory implications with larger lessons for social movement scholars. While boundary making builds solidarity among insiders, it threatens connections to others, as was also the case with the ideological and identitarian politics that limited second-wave feminism. In our case, boundary making limits transgressive body politics, leaving a moralized body politics of heteronormative femininity.
期刊介绍:
Gender & Society promotes feminist scholarship and the social scientific study of gender. Gender & Society publishes theoretically engaged and methodologically rigorous articles that make original contributions to gender theory. The journal takes a multidisciplinary, intersectional, and global approach to gender analyses.