基于光容积脉搏波的血压估计的可推广深度学习-基准研究。

Machine Learning. Health Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-15 DOI:10.1088/3049-477X/ae01a8
Mohammad Moulaeifard, Peter H Charlton, Nils Strodthoff
{"title":"基于光容积脉搏波的血压估计的可推广深度学习-基准研究。","authors":"Mohammad Moulaeifard, Peter H Charlton, Nils Strodthoff","doi":"10.1088/3049-477X/ae01a8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Photoplethysmography (PPG)-based blood pressure (BP) estimation represents a promising alternative to cuff-based BP measurements. Recently, an increasing number of deep learning (DL) models have been proposed to infer BP from the raw PPG waveform. However, these models have been predominantly evaluated on in-distribution (ID) test sets, which immediately raises the question of the generalizability of these models to external datasets. To investigate this question, we trained five DL models on the recently released PulseDB dataset, provided ID benchmarking results on this dataset, and then assessed their out-of-distribution (OOD) performance on several external datasets. The best model (XResNet1d101) achieved ID mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 9.0 and 5.8 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively, on PulseDB with subject-specific calibration, and 13.9 and 8.5 mmHg, respectively, without calibration. The equivalent MAEs on external test datasets without calibration ranged from 10.0 to 18.6 mmHg (SBP) and 5.9 to 10.3 mmHg (DBP). Our results indicate that performance is strongly influenced by the differences in BP distributions between datasets. We investigated a simple way of improving performance through sample-based domain adaptation and put forward recommendations for training models with good generalization properties. With this work, we hope to educate more researchers about the importance and challenges of OOD generalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":521035,"journal":{"name":"Machine Learning. Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"010501"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generalizable deep learning for photoplethysmography-based blood pressure estimation-A benchmarking study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Moulaeifard, Peter H Charlton, Nils Strodthoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/3049-477X/ae01a8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Photoplethysmography (PPG)-based blood pressure (BP) estimation represents a promising alternative to cuff-based BP measurements. Recently, an increasing number of deep learning (DL) models have been proposed to infer BP from the raw PPG waveform. However, these models have been predominantly evaluated on in-distribution (ID) test sets, which immediately raises the question of the generalizability of these models to external datasets. To investigate this question, we trained five DL models on the recently released PulseDB dataset, provided ID benchmarking results on this dataset, and then assessed their out-of-distribution (OOD) performance on several external datasets. The best model (XResNet1d101) achieved ID mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 9.0 and 5.8 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively, on PulseDB with subject-specific calibration, and 13.9 and 8.5 mmHg, respectively, without calibration. The equivalent MAEs on external test datasets without calibration ranged from 10.0 to 18.6 mmHg (SBP) and 5.9 to 10.3 mmHg (DBP). Our results indicate that performance is strongly influenced by the differences in BP distributions between datasets. We investigated a simple way of improving performance through sample-based domain adaptation and put forward recommendations for training models with good generalization properties. With this work, we hope to educate more researchers about the importance and challenges of OOD generalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":521035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Machine Learning. Health\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"010501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435175/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Machine Learning. Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/3049-477X/ae01a8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine Learning. Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/3049-477X/ae01a8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于光电容积脉搏波(PPG)的血压(BP)估计是一种有希望的替代基于袖带的血压测量。最近,越来越多的深度学习(DL)模型被提出从原始PPG波形推断BP。然而,这些模型主要是在分布内(ID)测试集上进行评估的,这立即提出了这些模型在外部数据集上的泛化性问题。为了研究这个问题,我们在最近发布的PulseDB数据集上训练了5个深度学习模型,在该数据集上提供了ID基准测试结果,然后在几个外部数据集上评估了它们的out- distribution (OOD)性能。最佳模型(XResNet1d101)在PulseDB上进行受试者特异性校准时,收缩压和舒张压的平均绝对误差(MAEs)分别为9.0和5.8 mmHg,未进行校准时分别为13.9和8.5 mmHg。未经校准的外部测试数据集的等效MAEs范围为10.0至18.6 mmHg (SBP)和5.9至10.3 mmHg (DBP)。我们的结果表明,性能受到数据集之间BP分布差异的强烈影响。我们研究了一种通过基于样本的域自适应来提高性能的简单方法,并对具有良好泛化特性的训练模型提出了建议。通过这项工作,我们希望教育更多的研究人员关于OOD泛化的重要性和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generalizable deep learning for photoplethysmography-based blood pressure estimation-A benchmarking study.

Photoplethysmography (PPG)-based blood pressure (BP) estimation represents a promising alternative to cuff-based BP measurements. Recently, an increasing number of deep learning (DL) models have been proposed to infer BP from the raw PPG waveform. However, these models have been predominantly evaluated on in-distribution (ID) test sets, which immediately raises the question of the generalizability of these models to external datasets. To investigate this question, we trained five DL models on the recently released PulseDB dataset, provided ID benchmarking results on this dataset, and then assessed their out-of-distribution (OOD) performance on several external datasets. The best model (XResNet1d101) achieved ID mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 9.0 and 5.8 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively, on PulseDB with subject-specific calibration, and 13.9 and 8.5 mmHg, respectively, without calibration. The equivalent MAEs on external test datasets without calibration ranged from 10.0 to 18.6 mmHg (SBP) and 5.9 to 10.3 mmHg (DBP). Our results indicate that performance is strongly influenced by the differences in BP distributions between datasets. We investigated a simple way of improving performance through sample-based domain adaptation and put forward recommendations for training models with good generalization properties. With this work, we hope to educate more researchers about the importance and challenges of OOD generalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信