可解释的机器学习预测妊娠期糖尿病的不良妊娠结局:回顾性队列研究。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Jiaxi Li, Xiali Liu, Shenyang He, Yan Ren
{"title":"可解释的机器学习预测妊娠期糖尿病的不良妊娠结局:回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Jiaxi Li, Xiali Liu, Shenyang He, Yan Ren","doi":"10.2196/71539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects over 5% of pregnancies worldwide, elevating risks of type 2 diabetes post partum and complications such as fetal death, miscarriage, and congenital abnormalities. Effective GDM management is essential to balance glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to develop interpretable machine learning models using GDM datasets for predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes and identifying key factors through the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) algorithm, thus supporting improved maternal and infant health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data preprocessing and feature selection were performed, with adaptive synthetic sampling used to address class imbalance. Classification models, including logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting, were built and enhanced through the stacking method. Model interpretability was assessed with SHAP to quantify feature contributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1670 patients, 200 experienced adverse outcomes. The stacking model outperformed individual models, achieving an accuracy of 85.6%, a sensitivity of 57.8%, a specificity of 95.9%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 on the test set. External validation on 159 patients showed a decline in performance (accuracy 83.6%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.67). SHAP analysis identified gestational age, glucose control, and diagnosis time among the most influential predictors, providing clinically meaningful insights into risk factors. Additionally, detailed SHAP-based visualization revealed the distribution of different feature values and their nonlinear impact on outcomes, as well as interaction effects between features. These interpretable analyses enabled a deeper understanding of individual and combined feature contributions, thereby enhancing clinical assessment capabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the potential of machine learning in predicting adverse outcomes in GDM, with interpretable features offering valuable clinical insights to enhance pregnancy management and maternal-infant health.</p>","PeriodicalId":56334,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Informatics","volume":"13 ","pages":"e71539"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jiaxi Li, Xiali Liu, Shenyang He, Yan Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/71539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects over 5% of pregnancies worldwide, elevating risks of type 2 diabetes post partum and complications such as fetal death, miscarriage, and congenital abnormalities. Effective GDM management is essential to balance glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to develop interpretable machine learning models using GDM datasets for predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes and identifying key factors through the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) algorithm, thus supporting improved maternal and infant health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data preprocessing and feature selection were performed, with adaptive synthetic sampling used to address class imbalance. Classification models, including logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting, were built and enhanced through the stacking method. Model interpretability was assessed with SHAP to quantify feature contributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1670 patients, 200 experienced adverse outcomes. The stacking model outperformed individual models, achieving an accuracy of 85.6%, a sensitivity of 57.8%, a specificity of 95.9%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 on the test set. External validation on 159 patients showed a decline in performance (accuracy 83.6%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.67). SHAP analysis identified gestational age, glucose control, and diagnosis time among the most influential predictors, providing clinically meaningful insights into risk factors. Additionally, detailed SHAP-based visualization revealed the distribution of different feature values and their nonlinear impact on outcomes, as well as interaction effects between features. These interpretable analyses enabled a deeper understanding of individual and combined feature contributions, thereby enhancing clinical assessment capabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the potential of machine learning in predicting adverse outcomes in GDM, with interpretable features offering valuable clinical insights to enhance pregnancy management and maternal-infant health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Medical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"e71539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441465/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Medical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/71539\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/71539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)影响全球超过5%的妊娠,增加了产后2型糖尿病和并发症(如胎儿死亡、流产和先天性异常)的风险。有效的GDM管理对于平衡血糖控制和妊娠结局至关重要。目的:利用GDM数据集开发可解释的机器学习模型,用于预测不良妊娠结局,并通过Shapley加性解释(SHAP)算法识别关键因素,从而支持改善母婴健康。方法:对数据进行预处理和特征选择,采用自适应合成采样方法解决分类不平衡问题。建立了逻辑回归、随机森林、支持向量机、极值梯度增强等分类模型,并通过叠加方法进行了增强。用SHAP评估模型可解释性以量化特征贡献。结果:1670例患者中,200例出现不良结局。叠加模型优于单个模型,在测试集上的准确率为85.6%,灵敏度为57.8%,特异性为95.9%,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.82。对159例患者的外部验证结果显示,该方法的准确性下降(准确率83.6%,受试者工作特征曲线下面积0.67)。SHAP分析确定了胎龄、血糖控制和诊断时间是最具影响力的预测因素,为风险因素提供了有临床意义的见解。此外,基于shap的详细可视化揭示了不同特征值的分布及其对结果的非线性影响,以及特征之间的交互效应。这些可解释的分析能够更深入地了解个体和组合特征的贡献,从而提高临床评估能力。结论:本研究强调了机器学习在预测GDM不良结局方面的潜力,其可解释的特征为加强妊娠管理和母婴健康提供了有价值的临床见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects over 5% of pregnancies worldwide, elevating risks of type 2 diabetes post partum and complications such as fetal death, miscarriage, and congenital abnormalities. Effective GDM management is essential to balance glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes.

Objective: We aim to develop interpretable machine learning models using GDM datasets for predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes and identifying key factors through the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) algorithm, thus supporting improved maternal and infant health.

Methods: Data preprocessing and feature selection were performed, with adaptive synthetic sampling used to address class imbalance. Classification models, including logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting, were built and enhanced through the stacking method. Model interpretability was assessed with SHAP to quantify feature contributions.

Results: Among 1670 patients, 200 experienced adverse outcomes. The stacking model outperformed individual models, achieving an accuracy of 85.6%, a sensitivity of 57.8%, a specificity of 95.9%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 on the test set. External validation on 159 patients showed a decline in performance (accuracy 83.6%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.67). SHAP analysis identified gestational age, glucose control, and diagnosis time among the most influential predictors, providing clinically meaningful insights into risk factors. Additionally, detailed SHAP-based visualization revealed the distribution of different feature values and their nonlinear impact on outcomes, as well as interaction effects between features. These interpretable analyses enabled a deeper understanding of individual and combined feature contributions, thereby enhancing clinical assessment capabilities.

Conclusions: This study underscores the potential of machine learning in predicting adverse outcomes in GDM, with interpretable features offering valuable clinical insights to enhance pregnancy management and maternal-infant health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Informatics
JMIR Medical Informatics Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Medical Informatics (JMI, ISSN 2291-9694) is a top-rated, tier A journal which focuses on clinical informatics, big data in health and health care, decision support for health professionals, electronic health records, ehealth infrastructures and implementation. It has a focus on applied, translational research, with a broad readership including clinicians, CIOs, engineers, industry and health informatics professionals. Published by JMIR Publications, publisher of the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), the leading eHealth/mHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175), JMIR Med Inform has a slightly different scope (emphasizing more on applications for clinicians and health professionals rather than consumers/citizens, which is the focus of JMIR), publishes even faster, and also allows papers which are more technical or more formative than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信