全麻患者动脉二氧化碳分压的实时评估:预测模型研究。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Ah Ra Lee, Jun Ho Lee, Sooyoung Yoo, Ho-Young Lee, Hyun Ho Kim
{"title":"全麻患者动脉二氧化碳分压的实时评估:预测模型研究。","authors":"Ah Ra Lee, Jun Ho Lee, Sooyoung Yoo, Ho-Young Lee, Hyun Ho Kim","doi":"10.2196/64855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate ventilation in mechanically ventilated patients is contingent upon the monitoring of the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) during general anesthesia. Despite its significance, continuous monitoring remains challenging due to the imprecision of noninvasive estimations and the invasive nature of traditional methods such as arterial blood gas analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to continuously estimate PaCO2 in mechanically ventilated patients, with the goal of potentially improving intraoperative monitoring accuracy under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used the VitalDB dataset from Seoul National University Hospital, comprising records of 6388 noncardiac surgery patients between August 2016 and June 2017. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, data from 2304 surgical cases (4651 PaCO2 measurement event points) were analyzed. The CatBoost regressor model was trained to predict PaCO2 using noninvasive physiological parameters and clinical information. The model's performance was evaluated using nested cross-validation across hypocapnic (<35 mm Hg), normocapnic (35-45 mm Hg), and hypercapnic (>45 mm Hg) subgroups and compared to conventional estimation methods based on end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The developed model demonstrated superior overall performance compared to traditional estimations. It achieved a mean absolute error of 2.38 mm Hg and an average intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.87. Furthermore, 90.02% of the model's estimations fell within the clinically highly acceptable range (error<±5 mm Hg) while only 1.20% of errors exceeded ±10 mm Hg. Performance improvements were observed across all PaCO2 subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The developed model provides more accurate and reliable estimates of PaCO2 than traditional ETCO2-based methods. This approach shows potential for facilitating real-time monitoring and timely clinical interventions. This study demonstrated the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance continuous monitoring of PaCO2; however, further validation, including prospective studies assessing clinical impact, is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":56334,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Informatics","volume":"13 ","pages":"e64855"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-Time Estimation of Arterial Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: Predictive Modeling Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ah Ra Lee, Jun Ho Lee, Sooyoung Yoo, Ho-Young Lee, Hyun Ho Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/64855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate ventilation in mechanically ventilated patients is contingent upon the monitoring of the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) during general anesthesia. Despite its significance, continuous monitoring remains challenging due to the imprecision of noninvasive estimations and the invasive nature of traditional methods such as arterial blood gas analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to continuously estimate PaCO2 in mechanically ventilated patients, with the goal of potentially improving intraoperative monitoring accuracy under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used the VitalDB dataset from Seoul National University Hospital, comprising records of 6388 noncardiac surgery patients between August 2016 and June 2017. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, data from 2304 surgical cases (4651 PaCO2 measurement event points) were analyzed. The CatBoost regressor model was trained to predict PaCO2 using noninvasive physiological parameters and clinical information. The model's performance was evaluated using nested cross-validation across hypocapnic (<35 mm Hg), normocapnic (35-45 mm Hg), and hypercapnic (>45 mm Hg) subgroups and compared to conventional estimation methods based on end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The developed model demonstrated superior overall performance compared to traditional estimations. It achieved a mean absolute error of 2.38 mm Hg and an average intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.87. Furthermore, 90.02% of the model's estimations fell within the clinically highly acceptable range (error<±5 mm Hg) while only 1.20% of errors exceeded ±10 mm Hg. Performance improvements were observed across all PaCO2 subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The developed model provides more accurate and reliable estimates of PaCO2 than traditional ETCO2-based methods. This approach shows potential for facilitating real-time monitoring and timely clinical interventions. This study demonstrated the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance continuous monitoring of PaCO2; however, further validation, including prospective studies assessing clinical impact, is necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Medical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"e64855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439857/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Medical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/64855\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/64855","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:机械通气患者的充分通气取决于全麻期间动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)的监测。尽管具有重要意义,但由于非侵入性评估的不精确性和传统方法(如动脉血气分析)的侵入性,持续监测仍然具有挑战性。目的:本研究旨在建立一种机器学习模型来持续估计机械通气患者的PaCO2,以期提高全麻下术中监测的准确性。方法:本回顾性研究使用首尔国立大学医院的VitalDB数据集,包括2016年8月至2017年6月期间6388例非心脏手术患者的记录。应用纳入和排除标准,分析2304例手术病例(4651个PaCO2测量事件点)的数据。利用无创生理参数和临床信息训练CatBoost回归模型预测PaCO2。模型的性能通过跨低碳酸血症(45 mm Hg)亚组的嵌套交叉验证进行评估,并与基于潮末二氧化碳(ETCO2)的传统估计方法进行比较。结果:与传统的估计相比,所开发的模型显示出更好的整体性能。平均绝对误差为2.38 mm Hg,平均类内相关系数为0.87。此外,90.02%的模型估计值落在临床高度可接受的范围内(error)。结论:与传统的基于etco2的方法相比,所开发的模型提供了更准确和可靠的PaCO2估计。这种方法显示了促进实时监测和及时临床干预的潜力。这项研究证明了人工智能在增强PaCO2连续监测方面的潜力;然而,进一步的验证,包括评估临床影响的前瞻性研究,是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Real-Time Estimation of Arterial Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: Predictive Modeling Study.

Real-Time Estimation of Arterial Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: Predictive Modeling Study.

Real-Time Estimation of Arterial Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: Predictive Modeling Study.

Real-Time Estimation of Arterial Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: Predictive Modeling Study.

Background: Adequate ventilation in mechanically ventilated patients is contingent upon the monitoring of the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) during general anesthesia. Despite its significance, continuous monitoring remains challenging due to the imprecision of noninvasive estimations and the invasive nature of traditional methods such as arterial blood gas analysis.

Objective: This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to continuously estimate PaCO2 in mechanically ventilated patients, with the goal of potentially improving intraoperative monitoring accuracy under general anesthesia.

Methods: This retrospective study used the VitalDB dataset from Seoul National University Hospital, comprising records of 6388 noncardiac surgery patients between August 2016 and June 2017. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, data from 2304 surgical cases (4651 PaCO2 measurement event points) were analyzed. The CatBoost regressor model was trained to predict PaCO2 using noninvasive physiological parameters and clinical information. The model's performance was evaluated using nested cross-validation across hypocapnic (<35 mm Hg), normocapnic (35-45 mm Hg), and hypercapnic (>45 mm Hg) subgroups and compared to conventional estimation methods based on end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2).

Results: The developed model demonstrated superior overall performance compared to traditional estimations. It achieved a mean absolute error of 2.38 mm Hg and an average intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.87. Furthermore, 90.02% of the model's estimations fell within the clinically highly acceptable range (error<±5 mm Hg) while only 1.20% of errors exceeded ±10 mm Hg. Performance improvements were observed across all PaCO2 subgroups.

Conclusions: The developed model provides more accurate and reliable estimates of PaCO2 than traditional ETCO2-based methods. This approach shows potential for facilitating real-time monitoring and timely clinical interventions. This study demonstrated the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance continuous monitoring of PaCO2; however, further validation, including prospective studies assessing clinical impact, is necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Informatics
JMIR Medical Informatics Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Medical Informatics (JMI, ISSN 2291-9694) is a top-rated, tier A journal which focuses on clinical informatics, big data in health and health care, decision support for health professionals, electronic health records, ehealth infrastructures and implementation. It has a focus on applied, translational research, with a broad readership including clinicians, CIOs, engineers, industry and health informatics professionals. Published by JMIR Publications, publisher of the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), the leading eHealth/mHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175), JMIR Med Inform has a slightly different scope (emphasizing more on applications for clinicians and health professionals rather than consumers/citizens, which is the focus of JMIR), publishes even faster, and also allows papers which are more technical or more formative than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信